Literature DB >> 24899252

Restoration of joint congruency and the glenoidal labrum after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair: a MRI match-paired analysis comparing primary Bankart repair and the uninjured labrum.

T Stein1, J Buckup, A P Mehling, R Hoffmann, T Efe, R von Eisenhart-Rothe, F Welsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The restoration of joint congruency and labrum slope and height after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (RB) compared to the primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (PB) remain unclear.
METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients after RB with minor glenoid deficits were matched to 23 patients after PB and retrospectively followed by a score system and native 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment. Bankart repair surgeries were performed using double-loaded knotless suture anchors. The glenoidal (GAA) and labral articulation arc (LAA), labrum slope, height index and morphology were assessed separately for the anterior and inferior glenoid and compared to 23 healthy volunteers [radiologic control group (RC)].
RESULTS: Arthroscopic revision Bankart repair showed 28.0 months post-operative equivalent anterior labral congruency (LAA, 9.3°/PB 9.9°/RC 10.1°) and inferior (LAA 9.9°/PB 9.6°/RC 10.5°). The anterior GAA remain decreased (54.6°/PB 55.7°/RC 58.0°) with an original inferior GAA (85.1°/PB 83.2°/RC 83.8°). The RB labrum was slightly decreased anteriorly (slope 22.9°/PB 23.9°/RC 24.6°; height index 2.4/PB 3.0/RC 3.2). The inferior portion had an equivalent labrum slope (23.8°/PB 24.7°/RC 25.1°), but a decreased height index (2.1/PB 2.2/RC 2.3). Morphologic labrum analysis revealed significant changes between all three groups. The clinical outcome after revision surgery was good-to-excellent, but inferior to the primary stabilization and without influence of joint congruency and labrum morphology to the clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: A properly applied arthroscopic revision of a Bankart repair generates sufficient restoration of the anteroinferior labral joint congruency and good clinical results. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899252     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-1990-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  4 in total

1.  The arthroscopic Bankart repair procedure enables complete quantitative labrum restoration in long-term assessments.

Authors:  J Bock; J Buckup; Y Reinig; E Zimmermann; C Colcuc; R Hoffmann; F Welsch; Thomas Stein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Outcomes After Revision Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brian C Lau; Tyler R Johnston; Bonnie P Gregory; Lorena Bejarano Pineda; Mark Wu; Amanda N Fletcher; Jessica H Hu; Leila Ledbetter; Jonathan C Riboh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 3.  Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability After a Failed Arthroscopic Soft-Tissue Repair Yields Comparable Failure Rates to Primary Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Seaher Sakha; Tushar Tejpal; Timothy Leroux; Jacob M Kirsch; Moin Khan
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Revision Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Moderate Glenoid Bone Defects: A Comparison With Primary Surgery.

Authors:  Young Dae Jeon; Hyong Suk Kim; Sung-Min Rhee; Myeong Gon Jeong; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-12-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.