Literature DB >> 24899104

Patterns of treatment among a cohort of older low-income adults starting new medications for osteoporosis.

D H Solomon1, E M Brown, D Chandler, A Bower, R Barron, H Mogun, J M Franklin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Among 125,954 new users of osteoporosis (OP) medications, 77 % of subjects stopped OP medications, and 23 % of subjects added or started a new OP medication during follow-up, with the first addition or start of a new OP medication occurring in a mean of 739 days after original OP treatment.
INTRODUCTION: We described patterns and predictors of OP medication use, focusing on treatment changes over time.
METHODS: We analyzed health and pharmacy insurance claims for a large cohort of low-income Medicare beneficiaries with a drug benefit for the years 1998-2008. Study subjects had documented Medicare claims and no receipt of OP medications (i.e., bisphosphonate, raloxifene, calcitonin, teriparatide, or hormonal therapy) during a baseline of 180 days. Subjects were then required to start an OP medication. Baseline patient and prescriber characteristics were assessed in multivariable Cox regression models to identify correlates of adding or starting a new OP medication. Fractures, bone mineral density testing, and visits with endocrinologists or rheumatologists occurring after baseline were also examined as correlates.
RESULTS: We included 125,954 new users of OP medications with a mean age of 78 years, 97 % female, and 92 % white. OP medication prescribers included specialists (i.e., endocrinologists or rheumatologists) (6.2 %), orthopedic surgeons (1.0 %), primary care providers (64.9 %), other physicians (3.7 %), and missing (24.1 %). Seventy-seven percent of subjects stopped OP medications, and 23 % of subjects added or started a new OP medication during follow-up, with the first addition or start of a new OP medication occurring in a mean of 739 days after original OP treatment; 4 % added or started a new OP medication more than once. In fully adjusted models, many baseline variables correlated with starting a second OP medication. Post-baseline fractures [hazard ratio (HR) 1.76, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.71-1.82] and bone mineral density testing (HR 2.94, 95 % CI 2.86-3.03) were strong predictors.
CONCLUSION: Approximately one quarter of patients starting an OP medication added or started a new OP medication during follow-up. Long-term sequential treatment strategy trials would inform optimal medication treatment for OP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899104     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2757-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores.

Authors:  Joshua J Gagne; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Raisa Levin; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Preventing osteoporosis-related fractures: an overview.

Authors:  Margery Gass; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Patterns of osteoporosis treatment change and treatment discontinuation among commercial and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug members in a national health plan.

Authors:  Yihua Xu; Hema N Viswanathan; Melea A Ward; Brad Clay; John L Adams; Bradley S Stolshek; Joel D Kallich; Shari Fine; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Compliance with osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Jerry Avorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Marilyn Arnold; Jennifer M Polinski; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-11-14

Review 5.  Osteoporosis update from the 2012 Santa Fe Bone Symposium.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Robert A Adler; John P Bilezikian; Mary L Bouxsein; Robert Marcus; Michael R McClung; Paul D Miller; S Bobo Tanner; Susan Randall
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988-2003.

Authors:  Randall S Stafford; Rebecca L Drieling; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-26

7.  Goal-directed treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; Felicia Cosman; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Mona Mehta; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Osteoporosis treatments and adverse events.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Laura Rekedal; Suzanne M Cadarette
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Gaps in treatment among users of osteoporosis medications: the dynamics of noncompliance.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Jerry Avorn; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Marilyn Arnold; Jennifer M Polinski; Amanda R Patrick; Helen Mogun; Daniel H Solmon
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  1 in total

1.  Management of oral bisphosphonates treatment by rheumatologists and determinants of therapeutic changes: a case-vignette-based study.

Authors:  C Roux; G Baron; K Briot; B Roux; B Cortet; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.