Literature DB >> 24898915

Direct prediction of profiles of sequences compatible with a protein structure by neural networks with fragment-based local and energy-based nonlocal profiles.

Zhixiu Li1, Yuedong Yang, Eshel Faraggi, Jian Zhan, Yaoqi Zhou.   

Abstract

Locating sequences compatible with a protein structural fold is the well-known inverse protein-folding problem. While significant progress has been made, the success rate of protein design remains low. As a result, a library of designed sequences or profile of sequences is currently employed for guiding experimental screening or directed evolution. Sequence profiles can be computationally predicted by iterative mutations of a random sequence to produce energy-optimized sequences, or by combining sequences of structurally similar fragments in a template library. The latter approach is computationally more efficient but yields less accurate profiles than the former because of lacking tertiary structural information. Here we present a method called SPIN that predicts Sequence Profiles by Integrated Neural network based on fragment-derived sequence profiles and structure-derived energy profiles. SPIN improves over the fragment-derived profile by 6.7% (from 23.6 to 30.3%) in sequence identity between predicted and wild-type sequences. The method also reduces the number of residues in low complex regions by 15.7% and has a significantly better balance of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues at protein surface. The accuracy of sequence profiles obtained is comparable to those generated from the protein design program RosettaDesign 3.5. This highly efficient method for predicting sequence profiles from structures will be useful as a single-body scoring term for improving scoring functions used in protein design and fold recognition. It also complements protein design programs in guiding experimental design of the sequence library for screening and directed evolution of designed sequences. The SPIN server is available at http://sparks-lab.org.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inverse protein folding problem; knowledge-based energy function; neural network; protein design; sequence profiles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24898915      PMCID: PMC4177274          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  44 in total

1.  Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function.

Authors:  Thomas P Treynor; Christina L Vizcarra; Daniel Nedelcu; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High-resolution structural validation of the computational redesign of human U1A protein.

Authors:  Neil Dobson; Gautam Dantas; David Baker; Gabriele Varani
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  What is a desirable statistical energy function for proteins and how can it be obtained?

Authors:  Yaoqi Zhou; Hongyi Zhou; Chi Zhang; Song Liu
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.194

Review 4.  Full-sequence computational design and solution structure of a thermostable protein variant.

Authors:  Premal S Shah; Geoffrey K Hom; Scott A Ross; Jonathan Kyle Lassila; Karin A Crowhurst; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Progress in computational protein design.

Authors:  Shaun M Lippow; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design.

Authors:  Daniela Röthlisberger; Olga Khersonsky; Andrew M Wollacott; Lin Jiang; Jason DeChancie; Jamie Betker; Jasmine L Gallaher; Eric A Althoff; Alexandre Zanghellini; Orly Dym; Shira Albeck; Kendall N Houk; Dan S Tawfik; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  De novo design of a single-chain diphenylporphyrin metalloprotein.

Authors:  Gretchen M Bender; Andreas Lehmann; Hongling Zou; Hong Cheng; H Christopher Fry; Don Engel; Michael J Therien; J Kent Blasie; Heinrich Roder; Jeffrey G Saven; William F DeGrado
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Improving the prediction accuracy of residue solvent accessibility and real-value backbone torsion angles of proteins by guided-learning through a two-layer neural network.

Authors:  Eshel Faraggi; Bin Xue; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-03

9.  Ab initio folding of terminal segments with secondary structures reveals the fine difference between two closely related all-atom statistical energy functions.

Authors:  Yuedong Yang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  High-resolution structural and thermodynamic analysis of extreme stabilization of human procarboxypeptidase by computational protein design.

Authors:  Gautam Dantas; Colin Corrent; Steve L Reichow; James J Havranek; Ziad M Eletr; Nancy G Isern; Brian Kuhlman; Gabriele Varani; Ethan A Merritt; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Structure-based protein design with deep learning.

Authors:  Sergey Ovchinnikov; Po-Ssu Huang
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.

Authors:  Jalil Villalobos-Alva; Luis Ochoa-Toledo; Mario Javier Villalobos-Alva; Atocha Aliseda; Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa; Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante; Francine Ochoa-Fernández; Ricardo Zamora-Solís; Sebastián Villalobos-Alva; Cristina Revilla-Monsalve; Nicolás Kemper-Valverde; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  ProDCoNN: Protein design using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Yang Chen; Chenran Wang; Chun-Chao Lo; Xiuwen Liu; Wei Wu; Jinfeng Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-01-06

Review 4.  Data-driven computational protein design.

Authors:  Vincent Frappier; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 7.786

Review 5.  Deep learning techniques have significantly impacted protein structure prediction and protein design.

Authors:  Robin Pearce; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 7.786

6.  Computational Protein Design with Deep Learning Neural Networks.

Authors:  Jingxue Wang; Huali Cao; John Z H Zhang; Yifei Qi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Protein Design with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Marianne Defresne; Sophie Barbe; Thomas Schiex
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Protein sequence design with a learned potential.

Authors:  Namrata Anand; Raphael Eguchi; Irimpan I Mathews; Carla P Perez; Alexander Derry; Russ B Altman; Po-Ssu Huang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Design of metalloproteins and novel protein folds using variational autoencoders.

Authors:  Joe G Greener; Lewis Moffat; David T Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.