Literature DB >> 24898406

Optical coordinate tracking system using afocal optics for image-guided surgery.

You Seong Chae1, Seung Hyun Lee, Hyun Ki Lee, Min Young Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Image-guided surgery using medical robots supports surgeons by providing critical real-time feedback information, such as surgical instrument tracking, patient-specific models, and the use of surgery robots. An image-guided surgery system based on afocal optics was developed to overcome the problems associated with conventional optical tracking systems.
METHOD: An optical tracking system was developed that utilizes afocal optics. Instead of using geometrically specified marker spheres as tracking targets, the proposed system uses a marker with a lens and a micro-engraved data-coded pattern. A position and orientation-tracking algorithm was developed to utilize the observed afocal images of the marker patterns. The marker used in this tracking system can be manufactured in a smaller size than traditional optical tracker markers, and the accuracy of the proposed tracking system has significant potential for improvement due to its focused and highly magnified image. The system was tested in vitro on an optical bench with position and orientation measurement experiments using a commercial optical tracker, Polaris Vicra (NDI Corp.) for comparison.
RESULTS: The afocal optical system provided accuracy in position and orientation that was equal or better than a commercial optical tracker system, and provided a high degree of consistency during in vitro testing. The position error was 21μ m, and the orientation error was 0.093°.
CONCLUSION: An afocal optical tracker is feasible and potentially advantageous for surgical navigation, as it is expected to have fewer occlusions and provide greater efficiency for coordinate matching and tracking of patient-specific models, surgical instruments, and surgery robots. This promising new system requires in vivo testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24898406     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1082-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  15 in total

1.  Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems.

Authors:  R Khadem; C C Yeh; M Sadeghi-Tehrani; M R Bax; J A Johnson; J N Welch; E P Wilkinson; R Shahidi
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2000

2.  Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery.

Authors:  R B Metson; M J Cosenza; M J Cunningham; G W Randolph
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Image-guided surgery.

Authors:  W E Grimson; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; P M Black
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  Virtual reality surgical planning for maxillofacial distraction osteogenesis: the role of reverse engineering rapid prototyping and cooperative work.

Authors:  Massimo Robiony; Iolanda Salvo; Fabio Costa; Nicoletta Zerman; Massimo Bazzocchi; Francesco Toso; Camillo Bandera; Stefano Filippi; Martina Felice; Massimo Politi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images.

Authors:  Guoyan Zheng; Sebastian Gollmer; Steffen Schumann; Xiao Dong; Thomas Feilkas; Miguel A González Ballester
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system.

Authors:  M P Fried; J Kleefield; H Gopal; E Reardon; B T Ho; F A Kuhn
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  P Miccoli; P Berti; M Raffaelli; G Materazzi; S Baldacci; G Rossi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Automated laser registration in image-guided surgery: evaluation of the correlation between laser scan resolution and navigation accuracy.

Authors:  R Marmulla; T Lüth; J Mühling; S Hassfeld
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a decade of change.

Authors:  Marco G Patti; Piero M Fisichella; Silvana Perretta; Carlos Galvani; Maria V Gorodner; Thomas Robinson; Lawrence W Way
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correlating molecular character of NIR imaging agents with tissue-specific uptake.

Authors:  Eric A Owens; Hoon Hyun; Joseph G Tawney; Hak Soo Choi; Maged Henary
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 7.446

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.