OBJECTIVES: To assess vector competence (infection, dissemination and transmission) of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus for Florida (FL) West Nile virus (WNV) isolates. METHODS: West Nile virus isolates (WN-FL-03: NY99 genotype; WN-FL-05-558, WN-FL-05-2186, WN-FL-05-510: WN02 genotype) collected from different regions of FL were used for vector competence experiments in Cx. p. quinquefasciatus from Alachua County and Indian River County in FL. Mosquitoes from both colonies were fed blood containing 7.9 ± 0.2 log10 plaque-forming units WNV/ml ± SE and incubated at 28 °C for 14 days. Vector competence, including rates of infection, dissemination, and transmission, was compared between colonies for WN-FL-03 using chi-squared. Virus titres in bodies, legs and saliva were compared using anova. Daily measurements of in vitro replication of WNV isolates were evaluated in Vero cells so that a standardised virus dose for each isolate could be delivered to mosquitoes. RESULTS: Infection and dissemination rates were high (≥ 95%) and not affected by isolate or colony (infection, P = 0.679; dissemination, P = 0.799). Transmission rates were low (≤ 20%), detected in one colony and affected by isolate (P = 0.008). Body and leg titres differed between isolates (body titre, P = 0.031; leg titre, P = 0.044) and colonies (body titre, P = 0.001; leg titre, P = 0.013) while saliva titre did not differ between isolates (P = 0.462). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in vector competence of mosquito populations may be attributed, in part, to exposures to WNV with genetic differences leading to different rates of replication in mosquitoes. Evaluation of vector competence for different WNV isolates may help us understand vector-virus interactions and, hence, the role of vectors in complex virus transmission cycles in nature.
OBJECTIVES: To assess vector competence (infection, dissemination and transmission) of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus for Florida (FL) West Nile virus (WNV) isolates. METHODS:West Nile virus isolates (WN-FL-03: NY99 genotype; WN-FL-05-558, WN-FL-05-2186, WN-FL-05-510: WN02 genotype) collected from different regions of FL were used for vector competence experiments in Cx. p. quinquefasciatus from Alachua County and Indian River County in FL. Mosquitoes from both colonies were fed blood containing 7.9 ± 0.2 log10 plaque-forming units WNV/ml ± SE and incubated at 28 °C for 14 days. Vector competence, including rates of infection, dissemination, and transmission, was compared between colonies for WN-FL-03 using chi-squared. Virus titres in bodies, legs and saliva were compared using anova. Daily measurements of in vitro replication of WNV isolates were evaluated in Vero cells so that a standardised virus dose for each isolate could be delivered to mosquitoes. RESULTS:Infection and dissemination rates were high (≥ 95%) and not affected by isolate or colony (infection, P = 0.679; dissemination, P = 0.799). Transmission rates were low (≤ 20%), detected in one colony and affected by isolate (P = 0.008). Body and leg titres differed between isolates (body titre, P = 0.031; leg titre, P = 0.044) and colonies (body titre, P = 0.001; leg titre, P = 0.013) while saliva titre did not differ between isolates (P = 0.462). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in vector competence of mosquito populations may be attributed, in part, to exposures to WNV with genetic differences leading to different rates of replication in mosquitoes. Evaluation of vector competence for different WNV isolates may help us understand vector-virus interactions and, hence, the role of vectors in complex virus transmission cycles in nature.
Authors: Sheri L Anderson; Stephanie L Richards; Walter J Tabachnick; Chelsea T Smartt Journal: J Am Mosq Control Assoc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 0.917
Authors: Kelly A Fitzpatrick; Eleanor R Deardorff; Kendra Pesko; Doug E Brackney; Bo Zhang; Edward Bedrick; Pei-Yong Shi; Gregory D Ebel Journal: Virology Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Allison R McMullen; Fiona J May; Li Li; Hilda Guzman; Rudy Bueno; James A Dennett; Robert B Tesh; Alan D T Barrett Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Alexandre S Moura; André F Cardoso; André L Costa-da-Silva; Carlos E Winter; A Tania Bijovsky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yan-Jang S Huang; Susan M Hettenbach; So Lee Park; Stephen Higgs; Alan D T Barrett; Wei-Wen Hsu; Julie N Harbin; Lee W Cohnstaedt; Dana L Vanlandingham Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2016-10-05
Authors: Eva Veronesi; Anca Paslaru; Cornelia Silaghi; Kurt Tobler; Uros Glavinic; Paul Torgerson; Alexander Mathis Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2018-04-28 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: David Navarro-Payá; Ilona Flis; Michelle A E Anderson; Philippa Hawes; Ming Li; Omar S Akbari; Sanjay Basu; Luke Alphey Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-12-03
Authors: André B B Wilke; Chalmers Vasquez; Augusto Carvajal; Maday Moreno; Douglas O Fuller; Gabriel Cardenas; William D Petrie; John C Beier Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 4.996