Literature DB >> 24898259

Retrospective evaluation of continuation rates following a switch to subcutaneous methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients failing to respond to or tolerate oral methotrexate: the MENTOR study.

D G I Scott1, P Claydon, C Ellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate continuation rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who failed to respond to or tolerate oral methotrexate (MTX) and were subsequently switched to subcutaneous MTX (SC MTX) in routine clinical practice.
METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with RA who had been prescribed SC MTX following oral MTX at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital and had been captured on the hospital pharmacy database of MTX use between 17 May 2011 and 20 March 2012. Only patients for whom complete records were available before and for at least 6 months after the switch were included.
RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the analysis (75.5% women; mean age at diagnosis 47.4 years; mean duration of oral MTX therapy 6.6 years). Patients were changed from oral to SC MTX because of lack of efficacy (50.5%), adverse events (43.9%), or other/unknown reasons (5.6%). High continuation rates were seen, with 83.0% of patients analysed still on SC MTX at 1 year, 75.2% at 2 years, and 47.0% at 5 years. Following the switch to SC MTX, < 10% of patients were prescribed additional biologic therapy during the first and second year because of an insufficient response.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SC MTX results in high continuation rates in patients who fail to respond to or tolerate oral MTX. Consequently, management guidelines should be adapted to include advice that SC MTX should be used before biologic therapy and that MTX failure is defined as failure only when use of SC MTX has failed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24898259     DOI: 10.3109/03009742.2014.910312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing Methotrexate Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Case for Subcutaneous Methotrexate Prior to Biologics.

Authors:  Poonam Sharma; David G I Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Oral to subcutaneous methotrexate dose-conversion strategy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Michael H Schiff; Peter Sadowski
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  MTX optimization or adding bDMARD equally improve disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the prospective study STRATEGE.

Authors:  Cécile Gaujoux-Viala; Christophe Hudry; Elena Zinovieva; Hélène Herman-Demars; René-Marc Flipo
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 4.  Methotrexate and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Evidence Regarding Subcutaneous Versus Oral Routes of Administration.

Authors:  Gerolamo Bianchi; Roberto Caporali; Monica Todoerti; Paolo Mattana
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Update on subcutaneous methotrexate for inflammatory arthritis and psoriasis.

Authors:  Gino Antonio Vena; Nicoletta Cassano; Florenzo Iannone
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 6.  Recommendations for optimizing methotrexate treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alfonso E Bello; Elizabeth L Perkins; Randy Jay; Petros Efthimiou
Journal:  Open Access Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Using video-based training for button-free auto-injection of subcutaneous methotrexate: A pilot study.

Authors:  Dawn Homer
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2019-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.