Literature DB >> 24898095

The effect of fibre source on the numbers of some fibre-degrading bacteria of Arabian camel's (Camelus dromedarius) foregut origin.

Anjas Asmara Samsudin1, André-Denis Wright, Rafat Al Jassim.   

Abstract

The total bacterial community of Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens in fibre-enriched culture of the foregut contents of 12 adult feral camels (Camelus dromedaries) fed on native vegetation in Australia was investigated using quantitative PCR. Foregut contents were collected postmortem, pooled and filtered before divided into two fractions. One fraction was used for extraction of DNA, while the other fraction was inoculated straight away into BM 10 contained filter paper (FP), cotton thread (CT) or neutral detergent fibre (NDF) as the sole carbohydrate sources in Hungate tubes. The tubes were incubated anaerobically at 39 °C for 1 week. After a near complete degradation of the FP and CT and extensive turbidity in the NDF, media subculturing was carried out into fresh media tubes. This was repeated twice before genomic DNA was extracted and used for quantification of bacteria. Using an absolute quantification method, the numbers of cells in 1 ml of each sample ranged from 4.07 × 10(6) to 2.73 × 10(9) for total bacteria, 1.34 × 10(3) to 2.17 × 10(5) for F. succinogenes and 5.78 × 10(1) to 3.53 × 10(4) for R. flavefaciens. The mean cell number of F. succinogenes was highest in the FP enrichment medium at approximately 107-fold, whereas for the R. flavefaciens targeted primer, the NDF enrichment media had the highest mean cell number at approximately 4-fold when compared to the rumen content. The data presented here provide evidence of fibre type preference by the two main fibre-degrading bacteria and would help us understand the interaction between fibre type and fibre-degrading microorganisms, which has ramification on camel nutrition at different seasons and environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24898095     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-014-0621-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  17 in total

1.  Ruminococcus flavefaciens Cell Coat and Adhesion to Cotton Cellulose and to Cell Walls in Leaves of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne).

Authors:  M J Latham; B E Brooker; G L Pettipher; P J Harris
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Quantitative RT-PCR: pitfalls and potential.

Authors:  W M Freeman; S J Walker; K E Vrana
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 3.  Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?

Authors:  J B Russell; D B Wilson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Degradation of cellulose and forage fiber fractions by ruminal cellulolytic bacteria alone and in coculture with phenolic monomer-degrading bacteria.

Authors:  V H Varel; H G Jung; L R Krumholz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.

Authors:  J Miron; D Ben-Ghedalia; M Morrison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.

Authors:  David M Stevenson; Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Characterization of Streptococcus bovis from the rumen of the dromedary camel and Rusa deer.

Authors:  M B Ghali; P T Scott; R A M Al Jassim
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.858

8.  Interactions between rumen bacterial strains during the degradation and utilization of the monosaccharides of barley straw cell-walls.

Authors:  J Miron; S H Duncan; C S Stewart
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1994-03

9.  Kinetics of in sacco fiber-attachment of representative ruminal cellulolytic bacteria monitored by competitive PCR.

Authors:  S Koike; J Pan; Y Kobayashi; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive.

Authors:  P Mosoni; F Chaucheyras-Durand; C Béra-Maillet; E Forano
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  3 in total

1.  Postbiotic L. plantarum RG14 improves ruminal epithelium growth, immune status and upregulates the intestinal barrier function in post-weaning lambs.

Authors:  Wan Ibrahim Izuddin; Teck Chwen Loh; Hooi Ling Foo; Anjas Asmara Samsudin; Ali Merzza Humam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The First Protocol for Assessing Welfare of Camels.

Authors:  Barbara Padalino; Laura Menchetti
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Foregut microbiology of the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius).

Authors:  Rafat Al Jassim
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2022-08-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.