| Literature DB >> 24897998 |
Weina Li1, Qiang Hao1, Liqing He1, Jieru Meng1, Meng Li1, Xiaochang Xue1, Cun Zhang1, Hong Li2, Wei Zhang3,4, Yingqi Zhang5,6.
Abstract
We previously reported that NGR-fused IFN-α2a (IFN-α2a-NGR) exhibited similar biological activities with native IFN-α2a and was well-tolerated in mice, rats and monkeys. In the current study, we evaluated the mechanisms of this fusion protein on angiogenesis and tumor formation. Our data indicated that IFN-α2a-NGR has the ability to target tumor blood vessels while preserving the original function of native IFN-α2a. IFN-α2a-NGR was found to be concentrated in the tumor tissues, particularly around the vessel areas. In contrast to IFN-α2a, IFN-α2a-NGR significantly decreased microvessel density and increased the apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells. IFN-α2a-NGR also decreased the expression of VEGF and bFGF in tumor cells. Significant inhibition of invasion, migration, tube formation and induction of apoptosis of endothelial cells were observed in IFN-α2a-NGR-treated group. In conclusion, results from in vitro and in vivo experiments indicate that IFN-α2a-NGR is a promising anti-angiogenic agent with greater therapeutic efficacy than IFN-α2a.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-tumor activity; IFN-α2a-NGR; NGR peptide; Tumor neovessels; Tumor-targeted IFN-a2a
Year: 2014 PMID: 24897998 PMCID: PMC4628926 DOI: 10.1007/s10616-014-9743-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cytotechnology ISSN: 0920-9069 Impact factor: 2.058
Fig. 1Anti-tumor effect of IFN-α2a-NGR and IFN-α2a in vivo. The anticancer activity of IFN-α2a-NGR was studied in xenografted mice. A549 cells or SPC-A-1 cells were implanted in mice, followed by daily i.p. administration with different doses of IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a, as indicated (n = 8). The mice were sacrificed and the tumor tissue was dissected. Tumor weights of different groups of A549 (a) or SPC-A-1-challenged mice (b). For all experiments, each group was performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed by Student’s t test. * p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups of same doses. (c) Pictures of isolated tumors. NO. 1–7 represents 7 treatment groups: 1. 0.9 % sodium chloride only; 2. IFN-α2a 1 × 106 IU/kg; 3. IFN-α2a 3 × 106 IU/kg; 4. IFN-α2a 9 × 106 IU/kg; 5. IFN-α2a-NGR 1 × 106 IU/kg; 6. IFN-α2a-NGR 3 × 106 IU/kg; 7. IFN-α2a-NGR 9 × 106 IU/kg. Treatment with IFNα2a-NGR resulted in significant reduction in tumor volume in comparison with negative controls. In contrast, only a mild suppression of tumor growth was noted with the IFNα2a-treated mice. Similar results were obtained from both the A549 and SPC-A-1 implanted groups
Fig. 2IFN-α2a-NGR can selectively bind to vessels and decrease MVD of tumor tissues. a Immunohistochemistry detection of IFN-α2a in tumor tissue sections. 3 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a was injected to tumor-bearing mice i.v. The tumor tissue from IFN-α2a-NGR treatment group showed strong staining, whereas those from negative controls and IFN-α2a treatment groups showed weak staining with anti-human IFN-α antibody. Shown is a representative image. b The ELISA assay of IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a binding to microtiter plates. The plates were coated with purified human CD13. The ELISA assay was carried out with serially diluted IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a as indicated. Plates were then washed and the bound IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a was detected using an anti-hIFN-α monoclonal antibody. The bound peroxidase was detected by chromogenic reaction with o-phenylenediamine after washing with DPBS. For all experiments, each group was performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed by Student’s t test. Points, mean (n = 3); bars, SE. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. c The detection of MVD in tumor tissues by immunohistochemistry. Vascular density in the tumor sections from A549-bearing mice was determined by the most intense CD34 staining. A representative image is shown. MVD in A549 tumors treated with IFN-α2a-NGR was markedly decreased in comparison with the control and IFN-α2a-treated tumors. d Statistics analysis on effects of IFN-α2a-NGR and IFN-α2a treatments on MVD in tumor tissues at different doses. Single endothelial cells or clusters of endothelial cells positive for CD34 staining were considered as individual vessels. * p < 0.05 versus control groups, ^ p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups
Fig. 3IFN-α2a-NGR decreased the expression of VEGF and bFGF. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from A549 bearing-mice treated with IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a were obtained from antitumor studies, prepared and coated on polylysine-coated slides. The sections were stained with the mouse anti-human- bFGF (Santa Cruz), VEGF (Zymed) antibodies to examine VEGF (a) and bFGF (b) expression in tumor tissues. (c) Western blot analysis of VEGF and bFGF expression in tumor tissues. (d) The Real-time PCR assay of VEGF and bFGF mRNA level in tumor tissues. For all experiments, each group was performed in triplicate or quadruplicate; the mean value ± SD of a representative of three independent assays is shown. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA statistical tests. * p < 0.05
The expression level of VEGF and bFGF in tumor tissues of tumor-bearing mice
| Groups | n | VEGF | Positive ratio (%) | bFGF | Positive ratio (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | + | ++ | − | + | ++ | ||||
| Control | 24 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 91.7 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 91.7 |
1 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a | 24 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 87.5 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 87.5 |
3 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a | 24 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 79.2* | 7 | 7 | 10 | 70.8* |
9 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a | 24 | 9 | 12 | 3 | 62.5* | 9 | 10 | 5 | 62.5* |
1 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a-NGR | 24 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 66.7*^ | 9 | 12 | 3 | 62.5*^ |
3 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a-NGR | 24 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 41.7*^ | 10 | 12 | 2 | 58.3*^ |
9 × 106U/kg IFN-α2a-NGR | 24 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 29.2*^ | 14 | 9 | 1 | 41.7*^ |
Negative (−) indicates that no positive cells were founded in tumor tissue sections. Weak positive (+) indicates a positive ratio between 0 and 50 %. Strong positive (++) indicates a positive ratio >50 %. Data were analyzed by χ2 tests in the SPSS statistical package. Differences were considered significant when the p value was <0.05
* p < 0.05 versus control groups, ^ p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups
Fig. 4IFN-α2a-NGR induced apoptosis and inhibited the migration, invasion and angiogenesis of endothelial cells. a TUNEL assay of vascular endothelial cells treated with IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a (100 or 1,000 IU/mL). b Statistics analysis results of apoptosis ratios. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 versus control groups, ^ p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups. c Inhibition of tube formation of EC treated with IFN-α2a-NGR was detected on Matrigel. ECs (1 × 105/mL) were seeded on top of the Matrigel with complete DMEM medium containing/not containing IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a and cultured for 8 h. The representative photographs were taken using light microscopy (200 × view field). d EC cells were seeded in upper chamber of Millicell insert with serum-free DMEM medium containing/not containing IFN-α2a-NGR or IFN-α2a and incubated with 10 % FCS DMEM medium in the lower chamber for 12 h. The cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet. The migrated cells were visualized under a light microscope. e Data of d were analyzed by Student’s t test. * p < 0.05 versus control groups, ^ p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups. f EC cells were seeded in Millicell insert coated with Matrigel Matrix. Invasion was induced by 10 % FCS DMEM medium containing 30 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor to the lower chamber. The cells invaded through the membrane of Millicell Inserts were counted in five random nonoverlapped 200 × view fields. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD of four separate experiments. For all experiments, each group was performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed by Student’s t test. * p < 0.05 versus control groups, ^ p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups. g Light microscopic images showed the inhibited migratory ability of HUVEC cells after 36 h of treatment with IFN-α2a-NGR. The wound widths were measured under a microscope using an ocular grid at 200 × magnification. h The wound areas were measured 36 h post injury. The results represent mean ± SD of at least 12 wounds and were analyzed by the Student’s t test, * p < 0.05 was considered significant. * p < 0.05 versus control groups, ^ p < 0.05 versus IFN-α2a groups