Literature DB >> 24897738

Early Patient Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with Quadriceps-Sparing Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Techniques: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Ivan M Tomek1, Stephen R Kantor1, LuAnne A Cori1, Jennifer M Scoville1, Margaret R Grove1, Tamara S Morgan1, Ishaan Swarup1, Wayne E Moschetti1, Kevin F Spratt1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Techniques that reduce injury to the knee extensor mechanism may cause less pain and allow faster recovery of knee function after primary total knee arthroplasty. A quadriceps-sparing (QS) subvastus technique of total knee arthroplasty was compared with medial parapatellar arthrotomy (MPPA) to determine which surgical technique led to better patient-reported function and less postoperative pain and opioid utilization.
METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind study, 129 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomized to the QS or the MPPA group after skin incision. All surgical procedures utilized minimally invasive surgery principles and standardized anesthesia, implants, analgesia, and rehabilitation. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was obtained at baseline and one and three months after surgery. Weekly telephone interviews were used to collect patient-reported outcomes including ambulatory device use, the UCLA (University of California Los Angeles) activity score, performance of daily living activities, and opioid utilization.
RESULTS: No differences between groups were seen in opioid utilization, either during the acute hospitalization or in the eight weeks after surgery. The QS group reported significantly less pain at rest on postoperative day one and with activity on day three (p = 0.04 for each). Compared with baseline, both groups showed significant improvements in the KSS at one month (MPPA, p = 0.0278; QS, p = 0.0021) and three months (p < 0.0001 for each) as well as week-to-week gains in walking independence through five weeks after surgery. Independence from ambulatory devices outside the home lagged behind independence indoors by about two weeks in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: When primary total knee arthroplasty was performed with contemporary minimally invasive surgery principles and standardized implants, anesthesia, and postoperative pathways, the QS technique yielded no significant early functional advantages or differences in opioid utilization compared with the MPPA technique. However, the mean pain scores reported by patients in the QS group were slightly lower at rest on postoperative day one and during activity on day three. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24897738      PMCID: PMC4049239          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  21 in total

1.  Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial.

Authors:  G S Roysam; M J Oakley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Accuracy in equianalgesic dosing. conversion dilemmas.

Authors:  R Anderson; J H Saiers; S Abram; C Schlicht
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period.

Authors:  Jason King; Daniel L Stamper; Douglas C Schaad; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Systematic review of medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael G Bourke; Peter J Buttrum; Prudence L Fitzpatrick; Philip A Dalton; Gwendolen A Jull; Trevor G Russell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Progressive quadriceps incision during minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: the effect on early postoperative ambulation.

Authors:  Aree Tanavalee; Satit Thiengwittayaporn; Pibul Itiravivong
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  The treatment of cancer pain.

Authors:  K M Foley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Matsueda; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Patient-reported activity level after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Diane L Dahm; Sunni A Barnes; Jeffrey R Harrington; Siraj A Sayeed; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Sub-vastus approach is more effective than a medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen A Bridgman; Gayle Walley; Gilbert MacKenzie; Darren Clement; David Griffiths; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  Promising early outcomes of a novel anatomic knee system.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Mina A Botros; Rami Madanat; Christian S Nielsen; Charles Bragdon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Variation in perioperative opioid use after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charles S Schumacher; Mariano E Menendez; Nicholas R Pagani; Andrew A Freiberg; Young-Min Kwon; Hany Bedair; David Ring; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07

3.  Medial subvastus versus the medial parapatellar approach for total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  James R Berstock; James R Murray; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom; Andrew D Beswick
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-03-26

4.  Which is the better choice? A clinical cohort study protocol evaluating the differences between standard medial parapatellar and minimally invasive approaches in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Qiong Jia; Xin Chen; Jun Zhang; Yang Hu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Total Knee Arthroplasty by Different Surgical Approaches: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Long Zhao; Ling-Feng Zeng; Jian-Ke Pan; Gui-Hong Liang; He-Tao Huang; Wei-Yi Yang; Ming-Hui Luo; Jun Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.