Literature DB >> 24897571

The effect of food deprivation on self-control.

A W Logue1, T E Peña-Correal.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effect of food deprivation on choice in a discrete-trials self-control paradigm, choice between a larger, more-delayed reinforcer and a smaller, less-delayed reinforcer. In Experiment 1, four pigeons were each deprived to 65%, 80%, and 90% of their free-feeding weights, and the delay to the smaller reinforcer was varied. Deprivation level did not affect choice, but the rate of ineffective key pecks made during the reinforcer delays increased as deprivation increased. In Experiment 2, four pigeons were exposed to conditions in which they were fed up to their 80% free-feeding weights following experimental sessions, and in which they were given no postsession feedings. Both the pigeons' weights and their latencies to insert their heads into the food hopper when food was available were lower when the pigeons were not fed following experimental sessions. Choice showed no change. Deprivation level affects response rate and eating behavior in these procedures, but not choice.
Copyright © 1985. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 24897571     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(85)90036-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  11 in total

1.  Hungry pigeons make suboptimal choices, less hungry pigeons do not.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Kristina F Pattison; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Measuring and modeling the interaction among reward size, delay to reward, and satiation level on motivation in monkeys.

Authors:  Takafumi Minamimoto; Giancarlo La Camera; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Nucleus accumbens lesions decrease sensitivity to rapid changes in the delay to reinforcement.

Authors:  Ashley Acheson; Andrew M Farrar; Michele Patak; Kathryn A Hausknecht; Artur K Kieres; Seulgi Choi; Harriet de Wit; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Hypothalamic-Extended Amygdala Circuit Regulates Temporal Discounting.

Authors:  Haofang E Li; Mark A Rossi; Glenn D R Watson; H Gregory Moore; Min Tong Cai; Namsoo Kim; Katrina A Vokt; Dongye Lu; Ryan A Bartholomew; Ryan N Hughes; Henry H Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The hybrid delay task: can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so?

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Valentina Focaroli; Jessica Bramlett; Valeria Tierno; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Acute nicotine increases both impulsive choice and behavioural disinhibition in rats.

Authors:  Katerina Zoe Kolokotroni; Robert J Rodgers; Amanda A Harrison
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Fabio Paglieri; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Level of deprivation does not affect degree of discounting in pigeons.

Authors:  Luís Oliveira; Amanda L Calvert; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 9.  Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?

Authors:  Ariana Vanderveldt; Luís Oliveira; Leonard Green
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  Impulsive for life? The nature of long-term impulsivity in domestic dogs.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Daniel S Mills; Hannah Wright
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.