Literature DB >> 24897441

Transitive responding in pigeons: influences of stimulus frequency and reinforcement history.

M Siemann1, J D Delius1, A A Wright2.   

Abstract

Fersen et al. (1991) (J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process., 17: 334-341) trained pigeons to discriminate four overlapping pairs of stimuli A + B -, B + C -, C + D - and D + E - (+ rewarded, - penalized). When subsequently tested with a pair BD the pigeons showed a strong preference for stimulus B. A special value transfer theory was offered as an explanation for this transitive responding. A simpler reinforcement ratio account based on certain inequalities factually affecting the accuracy performance on training pairs is proposed. To explore its implications an experiment employing a novel grit-grain conditioning method was carried out. The presentation frequencies of the training pairs were biased so that the choice accuracies obtained at the end of training were approximately equal for all pairs. Testing with pair BD still yielded high preference for B, documenting the robustness of the transitive responding phenomenon. When suitably adjusted to the training design the reinforcement ratio account was still viable. The transitive responding with the BD and other test pairs could also be simulated with a simple reinforcement based conditioning model. Some of the subjects were then retrained with modified presentation frequencies so that the subjects ended up with an even overall exposure to all training pairs. Test pairs continued to yield strong transitive responding. It is concluded that this behavioral effect is a robust phenomenon which is largely unaffected by training design modifications.

Year:  1996        PMID: 24897441     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(96)00020-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  7 in total

1.  The impact of asymmetrical light input on cerebral hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric cooperation.

Authors:  Martina Manns; Juliane Römling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Relational learning with and without awareness: transitive inference using nonverbal stimuli in humans.

Authors:  A J Greene; B A Spellman; J A Dusek; H B Eichenbaum; W B Levy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

3.  Cognitive representation in transitive inference: a comparison of four corvid species.

Authors:  Alan B Bond; Cynthia A Wei; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Cognitive mechanisms for transitive inference performance in rhesus monkeys: measuring the influence of associative strength and inferred order.

Authors:  Regina Paxton Gazes; Nicholas W Chee; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-10

5.  Systematic Analysis of Pigeons' Discrimination of Pixelated Stimuli: A Hierarchical Pattern Recognition System Is Not Identifiable.

Authors:  Juan D Delius; Julia A M Delius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  European starlings unriddle the ambiguous-cue problem.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Tiago Monteiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-26

7.  Transitive Inference Remains Despite Overtraining on Premise Pair C+D.

Authors:  Héctor O Camarena; Oscar García-Leal; José E Burgos; Felipe Parrado; Laurent Ávila-Chauvet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.