Literature DB >> 24896966

Effects of number of alternatives on choice in humans.

S Suzuki1.   

Abstract

The present study examined human choice between a task including a single alternative (i.e. a single-alternative task), and a task including multiple alternatives (i.e. a multi-alternative task). The subjects were divided into three groups and were exposed to three conditions. The multi-alternative task included two alternatives in two groups and included three alternatives in one group. An alternative in the single-alternative task was identical to one in the multi-alternative task. Amount of reinforcement for alternatives specific to the multi-alternative tasks was manipulated under three conditions in each group. When the amount of reinforcement was equal to or larger than that in the alternative common to both tasks, the subjects preferred the multi-alternative task over the single-alternative task. When amount of reinforcement was smaller, there was no difference in preference between the multi-alternative and the single-alternative tasks. In addition, the degree of preference for the multi-alternative task depended on the number of alternatives that produced larger reinforcers.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 24896966     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00049-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  6 in total

1.  The inherent reward of choice.

Authors:  Lauren A Leotti; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-09-19

Review 2.  Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control.

Authors:  Lauren A Leotti; Sheena S Iyengar; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Greater healthful food variety as measured by the US Healthy Food Diversity index is associated with lower odds of metabolic syndrome and its components in US adults.

Authors:  Maya Vadiveloo; Niyati Parekh; Niyati Parkeh; Josiemer Mattei
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Corticostriatal Circuits Encode the Subjective Value of Perceived Control.

Authors:  Kainan S Wang; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Control and Effort Costs Influence the Motivational Consequences of Choice.

Authors:  Holly Sullivan-Toole; John A Richey; Elizabeth Tricomi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-03

6.  The intrinsic value of choice: The propensity to under-delegate in the face of potential gains and losses.

Authors:  Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez; Cass R Sunstein; Tali Sharot
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2017-07-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.