Literature DB >> 24896668

Control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): selective reinforcement, call differentiation, and stimulus control.

K Manabe1, R J Dooling.   

Abstract

Budgerigars were trained to make a specific call using a real-time automated call recognition system and food reward. Calls produced by the bird were followed by food only if they were similar enough to a template call. The selective reinforcement of a particular call type increased the similarity of the bird's call to the template and decreased overall call variation, including call duration. After the birds' performance reached asymptote (i.e. the calls became matched to the template with no further increase in similarity), a call differentiation procedure was introduced. This procedure consisted of both matching-to-template and non-matching-to-template trials. In order to receive food in non-matching-to-template trials, the birds had to produce a call that was sufficiently different from the template call. This procedure resulted in a `new' call emerging from the first template call which occurred gradually rather than abruptly. In the third procedure, called two-template matching training, the birds had to match their calls to the first template call (signaled by illuminating the left LED) and to the second template call (signaled by illuminating the right LED). The calls produced in both first and second template call trials were well controlled by the position of the LED. These results extend the effects of selective reinforcement, differential reinforcement, and stimulus control on response topographies to the domain of vocalizations in budgerigars.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 24896668     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00041-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  7 in total

1.  Recovery of hearing and vocal behavior after hair-cell regeneration.

Authors:  R J Dooling; B M Ryals; K Manabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Behaviour, biology and evolution of vocal learning in bats.

Authors:  Sonja C Vernes; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Social calls provide novel insights into the evolution of vocal learning.

Authors:  Kendra B Sewall; Anna M Young; Timothy F Wright
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Effect of auditory stimuli on conditioned vocal behavior of budgerigars.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Seki; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Constraints on vocal production learning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Yoshimasa Seki; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  The multi-dimensional nature of vocal learning.

Authors:  Sonja C Vernes; Buddhamas Pralle Kriengwatana; Veronika C Beeck; Julia Fischer; Peter L Tyack; Carel Ten Cate; Vincent M Janik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 6.237

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.