Literature DB >> 24895831

Pathological findings of gastric mucosa in patients with gastric remnant cancer.

Kazuki Sasaki, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Kentaro Kishi, Masaaki Motoori, Masahiko Yano, Hiroaki Ohigashi, Masayuki Ohue, Shingo Noura, Shigeru Maruhashi, Hidenori Takahashi, Kunihito Gotoh, Tatsushi Shingai, Takashi Yamamoto, Yasuhiko Tomita, Osamu Ishikawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mechanism of remnant gastric cancer development has not yet been well established. In this study, we compared the background gastric mucosa of remnant gastric cancer with that of upper lesion-restricted gastric cancer to determine the difference in the pathogenesis of naive gastric cancer and remnant gastric cancer.
METHODOLOGY: Twenty-five patients with gastric remnant cancer after distal gastrectomy and a control group of 29 patients with naive gastric cancer restricted to the upper part of the stomach who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. We evaluated the gastric mucosa adjacent to cancerous tissues using the updated Sydney score system.
RESULTS: The surrounding gastric mucosa in the remnant gastric cancer group was significantly less atrophic than that of the group with gastric cancer restricted to the upper part of the stomach. In remnant gastric cancer, patients who underwent Billroth II (B-II) reconstruction at first gastrectomy developed cancer at the anastomotic site more frequently than those with Billroth I (B-I) reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The surrounding gastric mucosa was significantly less atrophic in remnant gastric cancer than naïve gastric cancer, which indicates that remnant gastric cancer might possess a different pathogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24895831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  5 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic features of remnant gastric cancer over time following distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  De-Wei Zhang; Biao Dong; Zhen Li; Dong-Qiu Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Outcomes for jejunal interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y anastomosis: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Xi Fan; Zhong-Fa Xu; Mei-Rong Wang; Dao-Tang Li; Xiang-Shan Yang; Jing Guo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical resection of gastric remnant cancer: a clinical comparison.

Authors:  Guo-De Luo; Bao-Hua Chen; Yong-Kuan Cao; Jia-Qing Gong; Shan-Hong Tang; Yun-Ming Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 4.  Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Takeo Fukagawa; Yoshio Haga; Koji Oba
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Remnant gastric cancer: An ordinary primary adenocarcinoma or a tumor with its own pattern?

Authors:  Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos; Marina Alessandra Pereira; Andre Roncon Dias; Anna Carolina Batista Dantas; Daniel Jose Szor; Ulysses Ribeiro; Bruno Zilberstein; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.