| Literature DB >> 24895409 |
Myrto Barrdahl1, Federico Canzian2, Amit D Joshi3, Ruth C Travis4, Jenny Chang-Claude1, Paul L Auer5, Susan M Gapstur6, Mia Gaudet6, W Ryan Diver6, Brian E Henderson7, Christopher A Haiman7, Fredrick R Schumacher7, Loïc Le Marchand8, Christine D Berg9, Stephen J Chanock9, Robert N Hoover9, Anja Rudolph1, Regina G Ziegler9, Graham G Giles10, Laura Baglietto11, Gianluca Severi11, Susan E Hankinson12, Sara Lindström3, Walter Willet3, David J Hunter3, Julie E Buring3, I-Min Lee3, Shumin Zhang3, Laure Dossus13, David G Cox14, Kay-Tee Khaw15, Eiliv Lund16, Alessio Naccarati17, Petra H Peeters18, J Ramón Quirós19, Elio Riboli20, Malin Sund21, Dimitrios Trichopoulos22, Ross L Prentice23, Peter Kraft3, Rudolf Kaaks1, Daniele Campa24.
Abstract
We studied the interplay between 39 breast cancer (BC) risk SNPs and established BC risk (body mass index, height, age at menarche, parity, age at menopause, smoking, alcohol and family history of BC) and prognostic factors (TNM stage, tumor grade, tumor size, age at diagnosis, estrogen receptor status and progesterone receptor status) as joint determinants of BC risk. We used a nested case-control design within the National Cancer Institute's Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3), with 16 285 BC cases and 19 376 controls. We performed stratified analyses for both the risk and prognostic factors, testing for heterogeneity for the risk factors, and case-case comparisons for differential associations of polymorphisms by subgroups of the prognostic factors. We analyzed multiplicative interactions between the SNPs and the risk factors. Finally, we also performed a meta-analysis of the interaction ORs from BPC3 and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. After correction for multiple testing, no significant interaction between the SNPs and the established risk factors in the BPC3 study was found. The meta-analysis showed a suggestive interaction between smoking status and SLC4A7-rs4973768 (Pinteraction = 8.84 × 10(-4)) which, although not significant after considering multiple comparison, has a plausible biological explanation. In conclusion, in this study of up to almost 79 000 women we can conclusively exclude any novel major interactions between genome-wide association studies hits and the epidemiologic risk factors taken into consideration, but we propose a suggestive interaction between smoking status and SLC4A7-rs4973768 that if further replicated could help our understanding in the etiology of BC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24895409 PMCID: PMC4159150 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu223
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mol Genet ISSN: 0964-6906 Impact factor: 6.150