Literature DB >> 24895329

Principles of representation: why you can't represent the same concept twice.

Louise Connell1, Dermot Lynott.   

Abstract

As embodied theories of cognition are increasingly formalized and tested, care must be taken to make informed assumptions regarding the nature of concepts and representations. In this study, we outline three reasons why one cannot, in effect, represent the same concept twice. First, online perception affects offline representation: Current representational content depends on how ongoing demands direct attention to modality-specific systems. Second, language is a fundamental facilitator of offline representation: Bootstrapping and shortcuts within the computationally cheaper linguistic system continuously modify representational content. Third, time itself is a source of representational change: As the content of underlying concepts shifts with the accumulation of direct and vicarious experience, so too does the content of representations that draw upon these concepts. We discuss the ramifications of these principles for research into both human and synthetic cognitive systems.
Copyright © 2014 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concepts; Embodied cognition; Language; Linguistic bootstrapping; Linguistic shortcut; Perceptual simulation; Representation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24895329     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  17 in total

Review 1.  Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Guy Dove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: an event coding approach.

Authors:  Tarek Amer; Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-21

Review 3.  Language as a disruptive technology: abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind.

Authors:  Guy Dove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou; Léo Dutriaux; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Interoception: the forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts.

Authors:  Louise Connell; Dermot Lynott; Briony Banks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Flexible and fast: linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing.

Authors:  Louise Connell; Dermot Lynott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

7.  Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs.

Authors:  Cai Wingfield; Louise Connell
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 8.  Putting concepts into context.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

9.  Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.

Authors:  Aurélie Miceli; Erika Wauthia; Laurent Lefebvre; Laurence Ris; Isabelle Simoes Loureiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 10.  On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.