Kevin P Mc Namara1, Vincent L Versace2, Jennifer L Marriott3, James A Dunbar2. 1. Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders University and Deakin University, Warrnambool and Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Australia. kevin.mcnamara@greaterhealth.org. 2. Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders University and Deakin University, Warrnambool and. 3. Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several effective methods to facilitate patient self-management of hypertension are available in primary care. These include direct support from community pharmacists and general practice, and the use of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The aim of this study is to establish the prevalence of use of key strategies and to determine their independent relationship with patient self-management attributes. METHODS: A survey of patients with treated hypertension was undertaken in 27 community pharmacies. This established recent use of BP monitoring and advice from health professionals. Patient awareness of BP and targets, appropriateness of BP targets and adherence to anti-hypertensive medications were assessed as indicative self-management outcomes. Predictors of outcomes were determined using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 215 surveys were returned. Two-thirds of patients were aged >65 years, and 45% had conditions warranting tighter BP control (<130/80 mmHg). Almost all patients reported monitoring of their BP in the previous year and 63% could report their most recent BP reading. Just 36% reported knowing a target BP, and 78% of reported targets were within guidelines recommendations. One-fifth (22%) monitored their own BP, and 15% reported non-adherence to medication. Doctors provided the large majority of professional advice. Self-monitoring or documentation of BP readings was independently associated with increased likelihood of BP and target BP being known. CONCLUSIONS: Regular monitoring of BP does not automatically translate to professional advice. Increased uptake of patient self-monitoring should be promoted as a means of enabling self-management.
BACKGROUND: Several effective methods to facilitate patient self-management of hypertension are available in primary care. These include direct support from community pharmacists and general practice, and the use of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The aim of this study is to establish the prevalence of use of key strategies and to determine their independent relationship with patient self-management attributes. METHODS: A survey of patients with treated hypertension was undertaken in 27 community pharmacies. This established recent use of BP monitoring and advice from health professionals. Patient awareness of BP and targets, appropriateness of BP targets and adherence to anti-hypertensive medications were assessed as indicative self-management outcomes. Predictors of outcomes were determined using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 215 surveys were returned. Two-thirds of patients were aged >65 years, and 45% had conditions warranting tighter BP control (<130/80 mmHg). Almost all patients reported monitoring of their BP in the previous year and 63% could report their most recent BP reading. Just 36% reported knowing a target BP, and 78% of reported targets were within guidelines recommendations. One-fifth (22%) monitored their own BP, and 15% reported non-adherence to medication. Doctors provided the large majority of professional advice. Self-monitoring or documentation of BP readings was independently associated with increased likelihood of BP and target BP being known. CONCLUSIONS: Regular monitoring of BP does not automatically translate to professional advice. Increased uptake of patient self-monitoring should be promoted as a means of enabling self-management.
Authors: Mohammed Al Ghobain; H Alhashemi; A Aljama; S Bin Salih; Z Assiri; A Alsomali; Gamal Mohamed Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Martine M A Beeftink; Wilko Spiering; Michiel L Bots; Willemien L Verloop; Rosa L De Jager; Margreet F Sanders; Evert-Jan Vonken; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel Voskuil Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathryn L DeLaughter; Gemmae M Fix; Sarah E McDannold; Charlene Pope; Barbara G Bokhour; Stephanie L Shimada; Rodney Calloway; Howard S Gordon; Judith A Long; Danielle A Miano; Sarah L Cutrona Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-12-01
Authors: Pedro Pallangyo; Makrina Komba; Zabella S Mkojera; Peter R Kisenge; Smita Bhalia; Henry Mayala; Engerasiya Kifai; Mwinyipembe K Richard; Khuzeima Khanbhai; Salma Wibonela; Jalack Millinga; Robert Yeyeye; Nelson F Njau; Thadei K Odemary; Mohamed Janabi Journal: Integr Blood Press Control Date: 2022-08-10
Authors: Edward Adinkrah; Mohsen Bazargan; Cheryl Wisseh; Shervin Assari Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 3.390