Literature DB >> 24894513

Intraductal ultrasound for high-risk patients: when will the last be first?

Pietro Fusaroli1, Giancarlo Caletti.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24894513     DOI： 10.1007/s10620-014-3226-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN： 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Dharmendra Verma; Asha Kapadia; Glenn M Eisen; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  John T Maple; Tamir Ben-Menachem; Michelle A Anderson; Vasundhara Appalaneni; Subhas Banerjee; Brooks D Cash; Laurel Fisher; M Edwyn Harrison; Robert D Fanelli; Norio Fukami; Steven O Ikenberry; Rajeev Jain; Khalid Khan; Mary Lee Krinsky; Laura Strohmeyer; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M S Petrov; T J Savides
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.

Authors:  Jong Ho Moon; Young Deok Cho; Sang Woo Cha; Young Koog Cheon; Hyun Cheol Ahn; Young Seok Kim; Yun Soo Kim; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee; Hae Kyung Lee; Chan Sup Shim; Boo Sung Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Are the echogenicities on intraductal ultrasonography really biliary microlithiasis?

Authors:  Beom Jin Kim; Pung Kang; Jong Kyun Lee; Dong Hyun Sinn; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Jong Chul Rhee; Jae Hoon Lim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones.

Authors:  T Wehrmann; K Martchenko; A Riphaus
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Usefulness of intraductal ultrasonography in icteric patients with highly suspected choledocholithiasis showing normal endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Dong Choon Kim; Jong Ho Moon; Hyun Jong Choi; A Reum Chun; Yun Nah Lee; Min Hee Lee; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang Woo Cha; Sang Gyune Kim; Young Seok Kim; Young Deok Cho; Sang-Heum Park; Hae Kyung Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Tarkan Karakan; Mehmet Cindoruk; Hakan Alagozlu; Meltem Ergun; Sukru Dumlu; Selahattin Unal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Louis Liu; Alan N Barkun; David Armstrong; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies.

Authors:  M Polkowski; J Regula; A Tilszer; E Butruk
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.093
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.