Melissa C Hanson1, Anna Bershteyn, Monica P Crespo, Darrell J Irvine. 1. Department of Biological Engineering, ‡Department of Materials Science and Engineering, §Health Sciences and Technology Program, and ∥David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.
Abstract
Lipid-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles (LCMPs) consist of a solid polymer core wrapped by a surface lipid bilayer. Previous studies demonstrated that immunization with LCMPs surface-decorated with nanograms of antigen elicit potent humoral immune responses in mice. However, the mechanism of action for these vaccines remained unclear, as LCMPs are too large to drain efficiently to lymph nodes from the vaccination site. Here, we characterized the stability of the lipid envelope of LCMPs and discovered that in the presence of serum the lipid coating of the particles spontaneously delaminates, shedding antigen-displaying vesicles. Lipid delamination generated 180 nm liposomes in a temperature- and lipid/serum-dependent manner. Vesicle shedding was restricted by inclusion of high-TM lipids or cholesterol in the LCMP coating. Administration of LCMPs bearing stabilized lipid envelopes generated weaker antibody responses than those of shedding-competent LCMPs, suggesting that in situ release of antigen-loaded vesicles plays a key role in the remarkable potency of LCMPs as vaccine adjuvants.
Lipid-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles (LCMPs) consist of a solid polymer core wrapped by a surface lipid bilayer. Previous studies demonstrated that immunization with LCMPs surface-decorated with nanograms of antigen elicit potent humoral immune responses in mice. However, the mechanism of action for these vaccines remained unclear, as LCMPs are too large to drain efficiently to lymph nodes from the vaccination site. Here, we characterized the stability of the lipid envelope of LCMPs and discovered that in the presence of serum the lipid coating of the particles spontaneously delaminates, shedding antigen-displaying vesicles. Lipid delamination generated 180 nm liposomes in a temperature- and lipid/serum-dependent manner. Vesicle shedding was restricted by inclusion of high-TM lipids or cholesterol in the LCMP coating. Administration of LCMPs bearing stabilized lipid envelopes generated weaker antibody responses than those of shedding-competent LCMPs, suggesting that in situ release of antigen-loaded vesicles plays a key role in the remarkable potency of LCMPs as vaccine adjuvants.
The development of vaccines based on subunit
antigens, recombinant
proteins, polysaccharides, or peptide fragments derived from pathogens,
has led to increased safety but decreased potency in vaccine candidates
compared to that of traditional live attenuated microbe vaccines.
To increase the immunogenicity of subunit vaccines, adjuvants play
an important role in vaccine development. Adjuvants are materials
that enhance immune responses elicited by vaccines either by providing
inflammatory signals (e.g., ligands for Toll-like receptors[1]), modulating the delivery of antigen to immune
cells, or both.[2] For example, antigen delivery
can be altered by providing a depot for long-term antigen release
from a vaccination site. Long-term biomolecule release is often achieved
by encapsulation of the cargo into a biodegradable polymer matrix,
such as poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), which
is often employed because of its history of safe use in humans, efficient
encapsulation of hydrophobic materials, and tunable drug release behavior.[3] However, delivery of protein antigens encapsulated
in PLGA micro- or nanoparticles is challenging because of the low
antigen encapsulation efficiency and denaturation/aggregation of proteins
during encapsulation and release.[4−6] Alternatively, antigen
delivery can be modulated at the single-cell level by surface-displaying
antigens on the surfaces of particulate carriers such as liposomes
or polymer particles. Surface display has been shown to enhance immune
responses, likely by increasing the degree of B-cell receptor cross-linking
and subsequent B-cell activation.[7−13] Furthermore, incorporation into lipid particles has been previously
shown to be an effective delivery method of lipophilic adjuvants such
as MPLA.[14,15] Despite the disadvantages of degradable
polymers for use with protein antigen, these polymers remain attractive
for the slow-release co-delivery of inflammatory adjuvant compounds
that could shape the immune response over time.[16−19]In order to combine the
surface display of antigen with a biodegradable
core in which we could ultimately co-deliver additional adjuvant molecules,
we recently described an approach for synthesis of lipid-enveloped
polymer microparticles and nanoparticles that present antigen bound
to a surface lipid bilayer.[20] A self-assembled
lipid bilayer coat surrounding a PLGA core was achieved by using lipids
as the surfactant component of an emulsion/solvent evaporation-based
PLGA particle synthesis. The lipid bilayer was observed to be a two-dimensionally
fluid surface that tightly envelops the polymer core. We employed
these lipid-coated microparticles (LCMPs) as vaccine delivery agents
by conjugating protein antigens to PEGylated lipids anchored in the
bilayer coating and co-incorporating adjuvant compounds such as the
TLR agonist monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) or α-galactosyl ceramide
in the particles. LCMPs elicited high, durable humoral immune responses
in response to injection of as little as 2.5 ng of the model antigen
ovalbumin (OVA) surfaced-displayed on LCMPs.[21] In addition, these particles triggered antigen-specific proliferation
of both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and production
of Th1-biased cytokines from T-cells in vivo.[21] When formulated as nanoparticles and functionalized
with a candidate malaria antigen VMP0001 and MPLA, lipid-coated particles
were shown to induce germinal center formation and elicited higher,
more durable antigen-specific titers of IgG antibodies of diverse
isotypes compared to those produced by vaccination with soluble VMP001
and MPLA.[22]Despite the efficacious
nature of these lipid-coated particles,
it was unclear how they presented antigen to the immune system, particularly
in the case of LCMPs, because these microparticles (diameter, 2.6
± 1.2 μm) did not freely drain to lymph nodes.[23] However, during initial cryo-TEM characterization
studies on the LCMPs, we observed that over time the lipid bilayers
at the surface of the biodegradable particles begin to delaminate
from the polymer core.[20] This observation
of delamination suggested that the lipid bilayer might not be stable
on the PLGA particle cores over time. Since antigen was conjugated
to the lipid bilayer, we hypothesized that delamination of the lipid
envelope could play a role in the adjuvant characteristics of LCMPs.Here, we directly evaluated the stability of the bilayer coating
of LCMPs and examined the role of bilayer delamination in the immunogenicity
of this particulate vaccine system. We found that under physiological
conditions LCMPs exhibit rapid bilayer delamination, leading to the
release of antigen-bearing lipid vesicles. We evaluated the kinetics
of bilayer shedding and the resulting effects on the immunogenicity
of LCMPs in vivo. In addition, we explored the kinetic
dependence of lipid delamination on the presence of lipid/serum in
the surrounding environment. To test the hypothesis that delamination
impacts immunogenicity, stabilized-bilayer LCMPs were developed either
by the inclusion in the lipid bilayer of cholesterol or lipids with
saturated carbon chains. Mice immunized with OVA–LCMPs generated
higher anti-OVA titers than mice immunized with stabilized-bilayer
OVA–LCMPs or OVA on delaminated lipid vesicles (DLVs) alone.
These results suggest that the in situ release of
delaminated lipid vesicles enhances humoral immune responses to surface-displayed
antigen, with LCMPs acting as a source of in situ generated antigen-bearing liposomes following injection.
Materials and Methods
Materials
All
lipids, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(DOPC), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phoshpo-(1′-rac-gylcerol)
(DOPG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
(DSPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide(poly(ethylene
glycol))2000] (DSPE-PEG2K-maleimide), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(lissamine rhodamine
B sulfonyl) (14:0 Liss-Rhod-DOPE), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospohethanolamine-N-(7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)
(NBD-DSPE), and cholesterol, were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids
(Alabaster, AL). Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)
with a 50:50 ratio of lactic acid and glycolic acid and an inherent
viscosity of 0.42 dL/G was purchased from Evonik Corporation (Birmingham,
AL). Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA, from Salmonella
enterica serotype minnesota Re 595, cat. no. L6895)
and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). N-Succinimidyl S-acetyl(thiotetraethylene
glycol) (SAT(PEG)4) was purchased from Pierce Biotechnology
(Rockford, IL). Purified ovalbumin (OVA) was purchased from Worthington
Biochemical (Lakewood, NJ) and subsequently passed through detoxi-gel
endotoxin-removing columns (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) to
remove any trace endotoxin.
Synthesis of Lipid-Coated Microparticles
(LCMPs)
Microparticles
consisting of a PLGA core and lipid bilayer envelope were synthesized
as previously reported.[20,24] Briefly, 5 mg of lipid
in a 72:18:10 DOPC/DOPG/DSPE-PEG2K-maleimide molar ratio (for DOPC–LCMPs)
or a 75:16:9 DSPC/DOPG/DSPE-PEG2K-maleimide molar ratio (for DSPC–LCMPs)
was dried under nitrogen followed by incubation under vacuum at 25
°C for 18 h. The resulting lipid film was dissolved in dichloromethane
(DCM) containing PLGA for a final polymer/lipid weight ratio of 16:1.
This organic solution was emulsified into distilled deionized ultrapure
water by homogenization at a ratio of 8:1 aqueous phase/organic phase,
stirred for 12 h at 25 °C to remove DCM by evaporation, and passed
through a 40 μm filter. Microparticles were isolated from the
resulting polydisperse samples by two centrifugation steps at 1100
rcf for 1 min each, with removal of the supernatant and resuspension
into pH 7.4 PBS following each centrifugation step. Particle size
distributions were determined using the Horiba Partica LA-950 V2 laser
diffraction particle size analysis system.
Synthesis of Liposomes
Liposomes prepared with a 72:18:10
molar ratio of DOPC/DOPG/DSPE-PEG2K-maleimide were used for immunization
studies, and vesicles with an 80:20 molar ratio of DOPC/DOPG were
used for in vitro lipid delamination studies. Lipid
films dried as described above were resuspended in pH 7.4 PBS, vortexed
for 30 s every 10 min for 1 h, subjected to six freeze–thaw
cycles in liquid nitrogen and a 37 °C water bath, and extruded
for 21 passes through a 200 nm pore polycarbonate membrane (Whatman
Inc., Sanford, ME). Vesicle sizes were determined by dynamic light
scattering (Brookhavenn 90 Plus particle size analyzer, Worcetershire,
UK). Liposomes were stored at 4 °C until use.
Antigen Conjugation
onto Lipid-Enveloped Particles and Liposomes
Thiolated OVA
was conjugated to the surface of maleimide-functionalized
lipid-enveloped particles or liposomes as previously described.[24] In brief, endotoxin-free OVA was functionalized
with the heterobifunctional cross-linker SAT(PEG)4 (Pierce
Biotechnology, Rockford, IL), which was then deacetylated to expose
sulfhydryl groups following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Following buffer exchange into 10 mM EDTA (pH 7.4), via 7000 MWCO
Zeba spin desalting columns (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL),
thiolated OVA (5 mg/mL) was incubated with particles (70 mg/mL) or
liposomes (3 mg/mL) at 25 °C for 4 h (for particles) or overnight
(for liposomes). To remove unbound antigen, particles were washed
three times by centrifugation for 5 min at 10 000 rcf with
pH 7.4 PBS, and liposomes were washed three times by centrifugation
in 30 kDa MWCO Vivaspin columns (Vivaproducts, Littleton, MA). The
amount of OVA coupled was determined by solubilizing lipids from the
particles/vesicles in 30 mM Triton X-100 and measuring the quantity
of OVA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Particles and
liposomes were stored at 4 °C until use, which was within 4 h
for immunization experiments and 48 h for in vitro experiments.
Analysis of Lipid Delamination from LCMPs
Particles
were synthesized as described above, incorporating 2 mol % of 14:0
Rhod-DOPE (for DOPC–LCMPs) or NBD-DSPE (for DSPC–LCMPs)
in the lipid composition. For characterization of the delamination
of protein antigen displayed on the lipid envelope, OVA was conjugated
to lipid-enveloped particles as described above. Postsynthesis, particles
were washed three times by centrifugation at 5000 rcf for 5 min and
subsequent suspension in pH 7.4 PBS. After the third wash, particles
were suspended at 12 mg/mL in pH 7.4 PBS, fetal bovine serum, or 10
mM 80:20 DOPC/DOPG liposomes in pH 7.4 PBS, divided into 150 uL aliquots
in separate eppendorf tubes for each time point/replicate, and incubated
with rotation at 37 °C. At each time point, replicate aliquots
were centrifuged for 20 min at 16 100 rcf, and the resulting
supernatant was collected for analysis. Lipid release from the LCMPs
was determined by adding 30 mM Triton X-100 to the supernatants, measuring
rhod-DOPE fluorescence in a fluorescence plate reader (Tecan Infinite
M200 Pro, Männedorf, Switzerland), and normalizing to the total
amount of fluorescent lipid present. OVA released from particles was
determined by anti-ovalbumin ELISA on the supernatants of the particle
aliquots, and the values were normalized to the total amount of OVA–lipid
present. This total amount of lipid per aliquot was determined in
fluorescently tagged samples by addition of Triton to three or four
standard aliquots, which were incubated at 55 °C and subsequently
vortexed and sonicated for 1 min each prior to centrifugation for
15 min at 16 100 rcf followed by fluorescent-based quantification
of the supernatant. To determine the total amount of the antigen,
OVA, released from DOPC–LCMPs particles, the same procedure
as above was employed without the 55 °C incubation step and with
ELISA-based quantification. The 55 °C incubation step is unnecessary
for lipid delamination from DOPC–LCMPs and therefore was omitted
to prevent any degradation of the OVA protein.
Size Characterization of
Delaminated Lipid Vesicles
DOPC–LCMPs were prepared
and incubated at 37 °C in pH
7.4 PBS for 7 days, after which the microparticles were pelleted via
a 30 min centrifugation step at 16 100 rcf. The size distribution
of DLVs in the supernatant was determined by laser diffraction as
described above.
Animal Studies
All animal experiments
were conducted
under an IUCAC approved protocol in accordance with local, state,
and NIH animal care and use guidelines. Immunizations were carried
out on female BALB/c mice, 6 to 7 weeks of age, purchased from Jackson
Laboratories. Immediately prior to immunization, 1.3 μg of the
TLR-4 agonist, MPLA, per 50 μL was mixed with 10 ng of OVA conjugated
to LCMPs, DLVs, or liposomes in sterile pH 7.4 PBS, following postsynthesis
insertion techniques described previously.[21,25] Mice were immunized by injection of 50 μL solutions s.c. at
the tail base and were boosted 14 days later. Serum samples were collected
on a weekly basis for analysis of serum antibody titers.
Antibody Titer
Measurements
Serum total IgG titers,
isotype IgG1 and IgG2A titers, and avidity indices
were determined as previously described.[24] Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with OVA, blocked with bovine
serum albumin, incubated with serially diluted serum, and detected
with HRP-labeled antimouse IgG, IgG1, or IgG2A (Bio-Rad) followed by development and measurement of optical absorbance
at 450 nm. Antibody titer is reported as reciprocal serum dilution
at an absorbance of 0.5. For avidity indices, duplicate serum dilutions
were prepared for each sample, and for one set of dilutions, wells
were incubated for 10 min with 6 M urea prior to detection with the
respective anti-mouse secondary antibody. The avidity index is reported
as the ratio of the titers of the urea-treated sample to those of
the non-urea-treated sample.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical
analyses were performed
using GraphPad Prism software. Comparisons of formulations over time
were performed using two-way ANOVA tests, and comparisons of multiple
formulations at a single time point were performed using one-way ANOVA
tests. Two-tailed unpaired Student t tests were used
to determine statistical significance between two experimental groups
for all other data.
Results and Discussion
Shedding of Lipid Vesicles
from LCMPs
We previously
reported that phospholipids incorporated into PLGA particles during
an emulsion/solvent evaporation synthesis segregate to the surface
of nascent particles, self-assembling into a lipid envelope surrounding
the polymer core (Figure 1A). When these particles
were incubated in pH 7.4 PBS at 37 °C for 7 days to permit partial
hydrolysis of the biodegradable particle core, cryo-TEM imaging revealed
evidence of delamination of lipid bilayers from the particle surfaces,
which was observed even in the absence of added MPLA, suggesting that
adjuvant incorporation did not induce this effect.[20] This finding suggested that lipids might be shed from LCMPs
by “budding” of lipid bilayers from the particles over
time (Figure 1A). This might be particularly
promoted in vivo, as serum albumin and lipoproteins
are known to extract lipid from fluid bilayers.[26−28] To directly
test this hypothesis, LCMPs with a diameter of 2.54 ± 0.95 μm
(Figure 1B) were incubated in PBS at 37 °C
for 1 week. After this incubation time, the PLGA particle cores were
still macroscopically intact,[20] and the
size distribution of the particles recovered by centrifugation was
essentially unchanged from that of the starting material (data not
shown). However, analysis of the supernatant by laser diffraction
to detect released lipid vesicles revealed nanoparticles with a mean
size of 176 ± 6 nm in the LCMP supernatants (Figure 1C). These particles were not PLGA fragments, as
neat PLGA nanoparticles of this size prepared independently were pelleted
by the centrifugation step used to remove LCMPs from the supernatants
in this experiment. To verify that these nanoparticles in the LCMP
supernatant were in fact lipid vesicles, we prepared particles containing
a rhodamine-tagged lipid tracer in the bilayer coating. Fluorescence
measurements on the supernatant collected from LCMPs incubated 7 days
in PBS at 37 °C showed the release of 54 ± 11% of the total
lipid tracer into the supernatant, confirming the release of delaminated
lipid vesicles (DLVs) from the microparticles over time.
Figure 1
(A) Schematic
structure of as-synthesized LCMPS with surface-conjugated
protein antigen and vesicles “budded” from PLGA polymer
core, forming delaminated-lipid vesicles (DLVs). (B) Size distribution
of freshly synthesized microparticles after wash steps determined
by laser diffraction. (C) Size distribution of delaminated vesicles
released from LCMPs after 7 days in PBS at 37 °C determined by
laser diffraction.
(A) Schematic
structure of as-synthesized LCMPS with surface-conjugated
protein antigen and vesicles “budded” from PLGA polymer
core, forming delaminated-lipid vesicles (DLVs). (B) Size distribution
of freshly synthesized microparticles after wash steps determined
by laser diffraction. (C) Size distribution of delaminated vesicles
released from LCMPs after 7 days in PBS at 37 °C determined by
laser diffraction.We next characterized
the kinetics of DLV shedding from LCMPs.
Microparticles containing rhodamine-labeled lipid were incubated in
PBS and DLVs released into the supernatants over time were detected
by fluorescence spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 2A, although lipids remained stably associated with LCMPs at
4 °C, vesicles were rapidly shed from the particles at 37 °C
in PBS, with delamination reaching a plateau after 24 h. To test the
effect of serum on lipid delamination kinetics, LCMPs containing rhodamine-conjugated
lipid were incubated in either serum or PBS, and delamination was
quantified as before. Figure 2A shows that
serum increased the fraction of delaminated lipid by 1.6-fold, with
substantial vesicle shedding within 4 h that continued slowly through
48 h. We hypothesized that interactions of the lipid surface layers
with lipid droplets in serum may be a major contributor to vesicle
delamination, as the adsorption of lipids by serum lipoprotein particles
is essential for lipid transport in vivo.[29] Previous studies have shown that liposomes are
destabilized in the presence of serum because of the transfer of phospholipids
to lipoproteins.[26,27,30] To model interactions of LCMPs with lipids in serum, a group of
microparticles was incubated in PBS containing 10 mM of 200 nm diameter
synthetic 4:1 DOPC/DOPG liposomes. The results indicate that the inclusion
of liposomes in the aqueous buffer replicates the kinetics of lipid
delamination in serum (Figure 2B), suggesting
that the presence of environmental lipid promotes DLV delamination
from LCMPs.
Figure 2
Kinetics of lipid delamination
from LCMPs in vitro determined by monitoring release
of fluorescently labeled lipid
tracer (A–C) or PEG-lipid-conjugated OVA (C) into the supernatants
of particles over time. (A) Release of rhodamine-lipid into the supernatant
of LCMP particles was assessed as a function of temperature in pH
7.4 PBS or 100% fetal bovine serum (p < 0.0001
comparing 37 °C serum to 37 °C PBS, 4 °C serum to 4
°C PBS, 37 °C serum to 4 °C serum, and 37 °C PBS
to 4 °C PBS). (B) Lipid release kinetics for rhodamine-lipid-labeled
LCMPs incubated in PBS containing 10 mM unlabeled DOPC/DOPG liposomes
at 37 °C. (C) LCMPs conjugated with OVA protein were incubated
in 100% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C, and OVA accumulation in
the supernatant was assessed over time by ELISA analysis of LCMP supernatants.
LCMPs carrying protein antigen covalently linked
to the membrane
(e.g., as illustrated in Figure 1A) elicit
robust humoral immune responses in vivo.[22,24] To test whether antigen conjugated to the lipid coat is transferred
to delaminating vesicles, thiol-functionalized OVA was conjugated
to maleimide-functionalized PEG chains incorporated into the particle
bilayer coating, and its release over time into serum at 37 °C
was quantified by ELISA. As expected, lipid-conjugated OVA was shed
from the LCMPs with kinetics matching rhodamine-labeled lipid delamination
(Figure 2C). Altogether, these data suggest
that LCMPs rapidly shed submicrometer liposomes under conditions mimicking
interstitial fluid to which the particles would be exposed during
immunization in vivo.Kinetics of lipid delamination
from LCMPs in vitro determined by monitoring release
of fluorescently labeled lipid
tracer (A–C) or PEG-lipid-conjugated OVA (C) into the supernatants
of particles over time. (A) Release of rhodamine-lipid into the supernatant
of LCMP particles was assessed as a function of temperature in pH
7.4 PBS or 100% fetal bovine serum (p < 0.0001
comparing 37 °C serum to 37 °C PBS, 4 °C serum to 4
°C PBS, 37 °C serum to 4 °C serum, and 37 °C PBS
to 4 °C PBS). (B) Lipid release kinetics for rhodamine-lipid-labeled
LCMPs incubated in PBS containing 10 mM unlabeled DOPC/DOPG liposomes
at 37 °C. (C) LCMPs conjugated with OVA protein were incubated
in 100% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C, and OVA accumulation in
the supernatant was assessed over time by ELISA analysis of LCMP supernatants.
Delaminated Vesicles Prime
Antibody Responses Nearly Equivalent
to Those of LCMPs
Given the rapid shedding of liposomes from
LCMPs in the presence of serum, we hypothesized that vesicles spontaneously
released from the microparticles following injection could play an
important role in the immunogenicity of LCMP vaccines. To explore
this possibility, we prepared OVA-conjugated LCMPs and incubated a
fraction of the particles at 37 °C in PBS to induce delamination,
followed by collection of the supernatant containing shed vesicles.
The concentration of antigen in the shed vesicle preparation was measured
by ELISA, and mice were then immunized with MPLA mixed with 10 ng
of OVA carried by purified delaminated vesicles or the parent (nondelaminated)
particle fraction. In addition, a third group of mice were immunized
with OVA-conjugated pure liposomes prepared with the same lipid composition
as the LCMPs to control for possible changes in the lipid structure
or composition occurring during budding of vesicles from the PLGA-core
particles. Each group of mice was boosted on day 14 with identical
formulations, and serum was collected over time for analysis of titers
of anti-OVA IgG. As shown in Figure 3A,B, DLVs
and the control synthetic liposomes elicited essentially identical
OVA-specific IgG responses. Both liposomal vaccines were somewhat
less immunogenic than that of intact LCMPs, eliciting average antibody
titers 2-fold lower than LCMPs. However, DLVs were still capable of
priming a strong immune response to this low dose of OVA, which elicited
undetectable anti-OVA titers in three out of four animals when administered
as a soluble vaccine mixed with MPLA (Figure 3A). Titers in all three particle immunization groups were maintained
over at least 70 days post priming. Although DLVs elicited weaker
OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A antibodies than
those elicited by parent LCMPs (Figure 3C),
both groups exhibited identical IgG2A/IgG1 ratios
(Figure 3D). As IgG2A is considered
to be indicative of “Th1-like” responses and IgG1, “Th2-like” responses, this result suggests
both the lipid-coated microparticles and shed liposomes primed balanced
Th1/Th2 responses and that the small difference in titers comparing
LCMPs and shed vesicles reflects a difference in strength of priming
rather than different Th-biasing of the antibody response. Altogether,
these data suggest that delamination of antigen-bearing liposomes
plays a critical role in the immune response primed by LCMPs carrying
surface-bound antigens.
Figure 3
(A–D) BALB/c mice (n = 6/group) were immunized
s.c. with 10 ng of OVA displayed on lipid-enveloped microparticles
(LCMPs), delaminated lipid vesicles (DLVs) collected from LCMPs, or
pure liposomes and were boosted with identical formulations on day
14. Liposomal vaccines are compared to control immunizations with
soluble OVA. In all particle formulations, 1.3 μg of MPLA per
injection was included. (A) Mean end-point OVA-specific IgG serum
titers on day 21 (***, p < 0.001). (B) Mean end
point OVA-specific IgG serum titers over time (p =
0.006 for formulation over time). (C) OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A isotype serum titers at day 21 (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). (D) Ratio of post boost peak (day 28) end-point
OVA-specific IgG2A to IgG1 serum titers.
(A–D) BALB/c mice (n = 6/group) were immunized
s.c. with 10 ng of OVA displayed on lipid-enveloped microparticles
(LCMPs), delaminated lipid vesicles (DLVs) collected from LCMPs, or
pure liposomes and were boosted with identical formulations on day
14. Liposomal vaccines are compared to control immunizations with
soluble OVA. In all particle formulations, 1.3 μg of MPLA per
injection was included. (A) Mean end-point OVA-specific IgG serum
titers on day 21 (***, p < 0.001). (B) Mean end
point OVA-specific IgG serum titers over time (p =
0.006 for formulation over time). (C) OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A isotype serum titers at day 21 (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001). (D) Ratio of post boost peak (day 28) end-point
OVA-specific IgG2A to IgG1 serum titers.
Immunogenicity of Stabilized-Envelope
LCMPs
Although
Figure 3 demonstrates that in vitro generated DLVs induced slightly lower antibody titers than those
by parental LCMPs, it remained unclear whether in vivo budding of antigen-carrying vesicles from the microparticles was
necessary for the high immunogenicity of the lipid-coated microparticles.
If in vivo delamination were essential, then LCMPs
that failed to undergo lipid delamination would be expected to prime
weaker immune responses. To test this hypothesis, we sought to prepare
LCMPs with lipid envelopes stabilized against delamination. We tested
two strategies to create such stabilized-envelope particles: incorporation
of high-TM lipid and incorporation of
cholesterol into the lipid coating.Phospholipids with high
melting temperatures have few/no unsaturated bonds in their acyl tails,
allowing the lipids to pack tightly and favoring formation of liquid
crystalline gel phases. In addition, the removal of double bonds in
the acyl chains of phospholipids in vesicles reduces the rates of
lipid transfer from liposomes to serum lipoproteins by 4-fold.[31] Therefore, DSPC (TM = 55 °C) was used in place of DOPC (TM = −20 °C) to generate high-TM DSPC–LCMPs. In vitro, inclusion
of high-TM lipid did not block vesicle
shedding completely but did lower the fraction of lipid lost from
the particles in the presence of serum by 33%, as shown in Figure 4A. We tested whether the reduced shedding of vesicles
would impact the immunogenicity of these particles compared to that
of DOPC-based LCMPs. BALB/c mice were immunized s.c. on days 0 and
14 with MPLA mixed with DOPC–LCMPs or DSPC–LCMPs each
carrying 10 ng of OVA. As shown in Figure 4B, despite the modest reduction in lipid shedding exhibited by DSPC–LCMPs,
the immunogenicity of these particles was significantly altered, as
mice immunized with DSPC–LCMPs showed a 3.5-fold reduction
in titers of OVA-specific antibodies compared to those from DOPC–LCMPs
at 1 week post boost (Figure 4B). Futhermore,
DSPC–LCMPs elicited 64 ± 10% lower total OVA-specific
IgG titers (p = 0.0023, Figure 4C) and lower serum IgG1 titers at the post boost peak
on day 21 (p = 0.0067, Figure 4D) when compared to those of DOPC–LCMPs. Interestingly, the
avidity index of the antibody response elicited by DSPC–LCMPs
was higher than that of the response primed by to DOPC–LCMPs
from day 28 onward (p = 0.0491 comparing the two
groups over time). However, the overall strength of the antibody response
elicited by LCMPs was reduced when vesicle shedding was impeded by
incorporation of high-TM lipids.
Figure 4
LCMPs prepared
with high-TM lipids
show reduced vesicle shedding and weaker antibody responses in vivo. (A) Kinetics of in vitro lipid
release from high-TM lipid-enveloped microparticles
(DSPC–LCMPs) or regular, low-TM lipid microparticles (DOPC–LCMPs) in serum, determined by
following fluorescent lipid tracer released into particle supernatants
upon incubation with FBS at 37 °C (p < 0.0001).
(B–E) BALB/c mice (n = 5) were immunized on
days 0 and 14 with 1.3 μg of MPLA mixed with DOPC–LCMPs
or DSPC–LCMPs, each conjugated with 10 ng of OVA. (B) OVA-specific
antibodies detected by ELISA as a function of serum dilution at the
post boost peak, day 21 (p < 0.0001). (C) Mean
OVA-specific IgG serum titers on days 21, 38, and 45 (DOPC–LCMPs
vs DSPE–LCMPs over time, p = 0.0023). (D)
OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A isotype serum titers
at day 21 (DOPC IgG1 vs DSPE IgG1, *, p = 0.0067). (E) Mean OVA-specific IgG avidity indices as
a function of time (p = 0.0491).
LCMPs prepared
with high-TM lipids
show reduced vesicle shedding and weaker antibody responses in vivo. (A) Kinetics of in vitro lipid
release from high-TM lipid-enveloped microparticles
(DSPC–LCMPs) or regular, low-TM lipid microparticles (DOPC–LCMPs) in serum, determined by
following fluorescent lipid tracer released into particle supernatants
upon incubation with FBS at 37 °C (p < 0.0001).
(B–E) BALB/c mice (n = 5) were immunized on
days 0 and 14 with 1.3 μg of MPLA mixed with DOPC–LCMPs
or DSPC–LCMPs, each conjugated with 10 ng of OVA. (B) OVA-specific
antibodies detected by ELISA as a function of serum dilution at the
post boost peak, day 21 (p < 0.0001). (C) Mean
OVA-specific IgG serum titers on days 21, 38, and 45 (DOPC–LCMPs
vs DSPE–LCMPs over time, p = 0.0023). (D)
OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A isotype serum titers
at day 21 (DOPC IgG1 vs DSPE IgG1, *, p = 0.0067). (E) Mean OVA-specific IgG avidity indices as
a function of time (p = 0.0491).To further test the idea that vesicle budding from antigen-conjugated
LCMPs is important for their immunogenicity, we also tested a second
strategy for inhibiting liposome shedding from the microparticles.
Cholesterol is a major component of cell membranes and is often used
as a stabilizing agent in lipid vesicle preparations because it orders
and condenses fluid-phase bilayers.[32−34] Thus, we hypothesized
that cholesterol, like high-TM lipids,
could also act to stabilize the lipid bilayer of LCMPs. We prepared
DOPC–LCMPs incorporating 0, 1, or 10 mg of cholesterol per
80 mg of PLGA. In vitro, DLV formation was not inhibited
completely by the inclusion of cholesterol, but delamination did decrease
with increasing cholesterol quantity. As shown in Figure 5A,B, increasing the amount of cholesterol incorporated
in the particles lowered the fraction of lipid shed into solution
from LCMPs, although the effect was less pronounced in serum than
in PBS, perhaps because of cholesterol absorption by lipoprotein particles
in serum. As with the high-TM lipid LCMPs,
we tested the immunogenicity of LCMPs with cholesterol by vaccinating
BALB/c mice. A plot of mean OVA-specific IgG end-point titers shows
decreased immunogenicity (up to a 2.5-fold average drop in titers)
with increasing cholesterol content (Figure 5C) (comparison of 10 vs 1 mg titer over time, p <
0.001). An analysis of IgG1 and IgG2A isotype
titers at the post boost peak indicates that IgG1 titers
are also inversely dependent on cholesterol quantity; however, IgG2A isotype titers remained relatively independent of cholesterol
presence (Figure 5D). Interestingly, avidity
indices were independent of cholesterol incorporation in the particles
(data not shown). Thus, using a second strategy to stabilize the lipid
bilayer of LCMPs by altering its composition, we found a similar reduction
in antibody responses when vesicle shedding was inhibited.
Figure 5
Cholesterol
was included in the lipid bilayer of LCMPs to decrease
delamination of the envelope. (A, B) Kinetics of lipid release, in
PBS (A) or fetal bovine serum (B), of LCMPs, which were synthesized
with 0, 1, or 10 mg of cholesterol (per standard 80 mg PLGA batch).
Delamination was quantified by the fluorescent detection of rhodamine-lipid
in the supernatant of aliquots of pelleted microparticles. (A: p < 0.0001; B: p < 0.0001 for effect
of cholesterol over time.) (C, D) BALB/c mice (n =
5) were immunized and boosted 14 days later with 10 ng of OVA conjugated
to the surface of LCMPs containing 0, 1, of 10 mg of cholesterol per
batch. In all formulations, 1.3 μg of MPLA per mouse was incorporated
into the lipid bilayer. (C) Mean end-point ELISA-based OVA-specific
IgG serum titers over time (comparison of 10 vs 1 mg titer over time, p < 0.0001). (D) End-point OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A isotype serum titers at day 28, the post boost
peak (*, p < 0.05; **, p <
0.01).
Cholesterol
was included in the lipid bilayer of LCMPs to decrease
delamination of the envelope. (A, B) Kinetics of lipid release, in
PBS (A) or fetal bovine serum (B), of LCMPs, which were synthesized
with 0, 1, or 10 mg of cholesterol (per standard 80 mg PLGA batch).
Delamination was quantified by the fluorescent detection of rhodamine-lipid
in the supernatant of aliquots of pelleted microparticles. (A: p < 0.0001; B: p < 0.0001 for effect
of cholesterol over time.) (C, D) BALB/c mice (n =
5) were immunized and boosted 14 days later with 10 ng of OVA conjugated
to the surface of LCMPs containing 0, 1, of 10 mg of cholesterol per
batch. In all formulations, 1.3 μg of MPLA per mouse was incorporated
into the lipid bilayer. (C) Mean end-point ELISA-based OVA-specific
IgG serum titers over time (comparison of 10 vs 1 mg titer over time, p < 0.0001). (D) End-point OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2A isotype serum titers at day 28, the post boost
peak (*, p < 0.05; **, p <
0.01).The agreement in results obtained
by these two different strategies
for physically stabilizing the bilayer suggests that the reduced immunogenicity
observed with DSPC–LCMPs or chol/DOPC–LCMPs when compared
to that with DOPC–LCMPs is not due to the chemical alterations
in the bilayer composition. The antibody response to LCMPs was not
entirely ablated by inhibiting vesicle delamination, but the reduced
response is all the more striking given the fact that the lipid bilayer
composition-based strategies we tested here for blocking DLV release
from the particles were at best only ∼30% effective under conditions
mimicking exposure to serum components. Furthermore, the immunogenicity
of liposomes is inversely proportional to membrane fluidity, and it
has been specifically shown that inclusion of cholesterol or high-TM lipid in liposome vaccine formulations increases
immunogenicity.[35] Thus, an enhancement
derived from decreased membrane fluidity of shedded liposomes may
be masking the full impact that decreased delamination from LCMPs
has on humoral antibody responses. Altogether, these results are consistent
with vesicle shedding from LCMPs playing an important role in the
priming of humoral responses by these microparticle vaccines. An advantage
of this system is the 180 nm diameter of DLVs, as nanoparticles in
this size range are well-suited for delivery to lymph nodes via subcutaneous
injection and direct draining into the lymphatic system.[36] Furthermore, antigen that drains freely to lymph
nodes can interact directly with B-cells, which generates optimal
humoral immune responses.[37]Coupling
the observed reduction in immunogenicity from lipid-stabilized
LCMPs with the in vitro observation of identical
delamination kinetics of LCMPs in serum or in 10 mM liposome buffer
leads to the possibility that antigen conjugated to lipid on LCMPs
may be taken up by lipoprotein particles in vivo.
This uptake and subsequent circulation throughout the lymphatic system
could account for the enhanced immunogenicity of LCMPs over stabilized-lipid
bilayer MPs or synthetic liposomes. Prior work characterizing the
lipid transfer between liposomes and lipoproteins further supports
this concept, especially as inclusion of cholesterol in liposome formulations
was shown to decrease the rate of lipid transfer to lipoproteins.[30] These results are consistent with our observation
of decreased immunogenicity of LCMPs with increasing cholesterol inclusion.
Conclusions
Here, we have explored the mechanisms underlying
the potent immunogenicity
of lipid-coated biodegradable microparticles in vaccine delivery.
We found that although these particles are too large to efficiently
drain from subcutaneous injection sites to lymph nodes, they are still
very effective in antigen delivery because of the spontaneous shedding
of antigen-bearing lipid vesicles from the particle surfaces, which
occurs rapidly under physiological conditions. Changes in lipid composition
that reduce microparticle surface vesicle budding lowered the immunogenicity
of the particles in vivo, suggesting that this mechanism
is important for the effectiveness of these antigen delivery vehicles.
This antigen-bearing vesicle release combined with molecular adjuvants
either incorporated in the membranes (as shown here) or encapsulated
in the PLGA particle core and slow-released at the injection site
to drain to local lymph nodes[16−19] could provide an effective strategy for enhancing
the immunogenicity of subunit vaccines.
Authors: Anna Bershteyn; Melissa C Hanson; Monica P Crespo; James J Moon; Adrienne V Li; Heikyung Suh; Darrell J Irvine Journal: J Control Release Date: 2011-07-24 Impact factor: 9.776