Literature DB >> 24894007

High-biomass forests of the Pacific Northwest: who manages them and how much is protected?

Olga N Krankina1, Dominick A DellaSala, Jessica Leonard, Mikhail Yatskov.   

Abstract

To examine ownership and protection status of forests with high-biomass stores (>200 Mg/ha) in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of the United States, we used the latest versions of publicly available datasets. Overlay, aggregation, and GIS-based computation of forest area in broad biomass classes in the PNW showed that the National Forests contained the largest area of high-biomass forests (48.4 % of regional total), but the area of high-biomass forest on private lands was important as well (22.8 %). Between 2000 and 2008, the loss of high-biomass forests to fire on the National Forests was 7.6 % (236,000 ha), while the loss of high-biomass forest to logging on private lands (364,000 ha) exceeded the losses to fire across all ownerships. Many remaining high-biomass forest stands are vulnerable to future harvest as only 20 % are strictly protected from logging, while 26 % are not protected at all. The level of protection for high-biomass forests varies by state, for example, 31 % of all high-biomass federal forests in Washington are in high-protection status compared to only 9 % in Oregon. Across the conterminous US, high-biomass forest covers <3 % of all forest land and the PNW region holds 56.8 % of this area or 5.87 million ha. Forests with high-biomass stores are important to document and monitor as they are scarce, often threatened by harvest and development, and their disturbance including timber harvest results in net C losses to the atmosphere that can take a new generation of trees many decades or centuries to offset.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24894007     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0283-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Forest inventory and analysis: a national inventory and monitoring program.

Authors:  W Brad Smith
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Special section: the Northwest Forest Plan: a global model of forest management in contentious times.

Authors:  Dominick A DellaSala; Jack E Williams
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Status of mature and old-growth forests in the Pacific Northwest.

Authors:  James R Strittholt; Dominick A DellaSala; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests.

Authors:  Heather Keith; Brendan G Mackey; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Conserving old-growth forest diversity in disturbance-prone landscapes.

Authors:  Thomas A Spies; Miles A Hemstrom; Andrew Youngblood; Susan Hummel
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.560

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of national level biomass maps for conterminous US: understanding pattern and causes of differences.

Authors:  N Neeti; R Kennedy
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2016-08-26

2.  Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States.

Authors:  Polly C Buotte; Beverly E Law; William J Ripple; Logan T Berner
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.657

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.