Literature DB >> 24892796

Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.

Juan Carlos Palma1, Natalia Tejedor-Sanz, M Dolores Oteo, José Antonio Alarcón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and protraction from chincup therapy in girls with Class III malocclusion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two girls (mean age  =  9.1 ± 0.6 years) with Class III malocclusion were treated with combined RME and protraction from a chincup, followed by fixed appliances. Lateral cephalograms were evaluated before treatment, at the end of a two-phase treatment protocol (mean age  =  15.1 ± 1.1 years), and 10.9 ± 0.5 years after the end of treatment (mean age  =  27.5 ± 0.5 years). The control group consisted of 22 matched girls with skeletal Class I malocclusion.
RESULTS: After treatment, the Class III group showed significant improvement of the Class III malocclusion, mainly due to changes in the mandible (ie, SNB angle decreased 1.8 ± 1.6°) and significant improvement of the sagittal maxillomandibular relationship (Wits appraisal increased 2.6 ± 2.1 mm; ANB angle increased 1.0 ± 0.3 mm). These changes remained stable for an average of 10 years after the end of therapy. No tendency toward relapse was detected, and the mandibular position showed favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: RME and protraction from chincup therapy led to successful long-term outcomes in 18 of 22 patients (81.8%). This treatment approach can be considered an efficient therapy in growing girls with mild skeletal Class III malocclusion caused by maxillary retrusion and mandibular protrusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chincup; Class III; Long-term; Maxillary protraction; Stability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24892796     DOI: 10.2319/012514-68.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yifan Lin; Runzhi Guo; Liyu Hou; Zhen Fu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage.

Authors:  Hyeon-Jong Lee; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effects of strontium ranelate on bone formation in the mid-palatal suture after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Shuya Zhao; Xuxia Wang; Na Li; Yun Chen; Yuran Su; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of skeletal Class III treatment.

Authors:  Natalia Tejedor; Conchita Martín; José Antonio Alarcón; María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud; Juan Carlos Palma-Fernández
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 5.  Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.

Authors:  Zeinab Azamian; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.