Literature DB >> 24891317

Symptomatic efficacy of etanercept and its effects on objective signs of inflammation in early nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Maxime Dougados1, Désirée van der Heijde, Joachim Sieper, Jürgen Braun, Walter P Maksymowych, Gustavo Citera, Corinne Miceli-Richard, James Cheng-Chung Wei, Ron Pedersen, Randi Bonin, Mahboob U Rahman, Isabelle Logeart, Joseph Wajdula, Andrew S Koenig, Bonnie Vlahos, Daniel Alvarez, Jack F Bukowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of early active nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-refractory nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).
METHODS: The study population consisted of patients who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axial SpA but not the modified New York radiographic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis (as assessed by a radiologist at the central trial site), had a symptom duration of >3 months but <5 years, had a score of ≥4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and had been treated unsuccessfully with ≥2 NSAIDs. Patients were randomized to receive etanercept 50 mg/week or placebo and continued background NSAID treatment for 12 weeks (double-blind study); during the subsequent open-label period, all patients received etanercept 50 mg/week. The primary study end point was meeting the ASAS criteria for 40% improvement (ASAS40) at week 12. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints and spine was performed at baseline and week 12.
RESULTS: One hundred six patients were randomized to the etanercept group and 109 to the placebo group. Of the 215 patients, the mean ± SD age at baseline was 32.0 ± 7.8 years, 154 (72%) were HLA-B27 positive, and 174 (81%) had MRI-confirmed sacroiliitis. At 12 weeks, the proportion of patients with improvement according to the ASAS40 was significantly higher in the etanercept group than in the placebo group (34 of 105 [32%] versus 17 of 108 [16%]; P = 0.006). Patients who received etanercept exhibited a greater reduction in MRI-based scores for sacroiliac joint inflammation (-46.9% versus -10.9%; P < 0.001) and spinal inflammation (-45.4% versus -33.4%; P = 0.04) compared with placebo-treated patients at week 12. Post hoc analyses suggested a possible association between higher baseline C-reactive protein levels or MRI sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and higher rates of ASAS40 response to etanercept. At week 24, patients in the placebo group who had switched to etanercept at 12 weeks exhibited improvement similar to that observed in patients who had received etanercept for 24 weeks.
CONCLUSION: In patients with nonradiographic axial SpA, etanercept treatment was associated with rapid, significant improvement in symptomatic disease activity, function, and systemic and skeletal inflammation over 12 weeks; clinical/functional improvement was sustained over 24 weeks.
© 2014 Pfizer Inc. Arthritis & Rheumatology is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24891317     DOI: 10.1002/art.38721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  67 in total

Review 1.  Axial spondyloarthritis: concept, construct, classification and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Philip C Robinson; Sjef van der Linden; Muhammad A Khan; William J Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Therapies of Early, Advanced, and Late Onset Forms of Axial Spondyloarthritis, and the Need for Treat to Target Strategies.

Authors:  Nurullah Akkoc; Gercek Can; Salvatore D'Angelo; Angela Padula; Ignazio Olivieri
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: From Prognostication to Disease Modification.

Authors:  Ismail Sari; Nigil Haroon
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  New evidence on the management of spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Joachim Sieper; Denis Poddubnyy
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  The role of MRI in the evaluation of spondyloarthritis: a clinician's guide.

Authors:  Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  New advances in the understanding and treatment of axial spondyloarthritis: from chance to choice.

Authors:  Sayam Dubash; Dennis McGonagle; Helena Marzo-Ortega
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Risk of serious infections in biological treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sen Wang; Qian He; Zongwen Shuai
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 8.  Looking into the new ASAS classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis through the other side of the glass.

Authors:  Nurullah Akkoc; Muhammad A Khan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  Spontaneous, drug-induced, and drug-free remission in peripheral and axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Denis Poddubnyy; Lianne S Gensler
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 10.  The ASAS Criteria for Axial Spondyloarthritis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Proposals for a Way Forward.

Authors:  Sjef van der Linden; Nurullah Akkoc; Matthew A Brown; Philip C Robinson; Muhammad A Khan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.