Literature DB >> 24891132

Pharmacogenetics, plasma concentrations, clinical signs and EEG during propofol treatment.

Muhammad Suleman Khan1, Eva-Lena Zetterlund, Henrik Gréen, Anna Oscarsson, Anna-Lena Zackrisson, Eva Svanborg, Maj-Lis Lindholm, Harald Persson, Christina Eintrei.   

Abstract

A variety of techniques have been developed to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Propofol's pharmacokinetics and response vary greatly, which might be explained by genetic polymorphisms. We investigated the impact of genetic variations on dosage, anaesthetic depth and recovery after total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. A total of 101 patients were enrolled in the study. The plasma concentration of propofol during anaesthesia was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. EEG was monitored during the surgical procedure as a measure of anaesthetic depth. Pyrosequencing was used to determine genetic polymorphisms in CYP2B6, CYP2C9, the UGTIA9-promotor and the GABRE gene. The correlation between genotype and to plasma concentration at the time of loss of consciousness (LOC), the total induction dose, the time to anaesthesia, eye opening and clearance were investigated. EEG monitoring showed that the majority of the patients had not reached a sufficient level of anaesthetic depth (subdelta) at the time of loss of consciousness despite a high induction dose of propofol. Patients with UGT1A9-331C/T had a higher propofol clearance than those without (p = 0.03) and required a higher induction dose (p = 0.03). The patients with UGT1A9-1818T/C required a longer time to LOC (p = 0.03). The patients with CYP2C9*2 had a higher concentration of propofol at the time of LOC (p = 0.02). The polymorphisms in the metabolizing enzymes and the receptor could not explain the large variation seen in the pharmacokinetics of propofol and the clinical response seen. At LOC, the patients showed a large difference in EEG pattern.
© 2014 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24891132     DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  14 in total

Review 1.  3D in vitro modeling of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Amy M Hopkins; Elise DeSimone; Karolina Chwalek; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Propofol Ameliorates Exaggerated Human Neutrophil Activation in a LPS Sepsis Model.

Authors:  Andre Bredthauer; Angela Geiger; Michael Gruber; Sophie-Marie Pfaehler; Walter Petermichl; Diane Bitzinger; Thomas Metterlein; Timo Seyfried
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-08-11

3.  Cloning and characterization of the rat Slo3 (KCa 5.1) channel: From biophysics to pharmacology.

Authors:  Guang-Ming Wang; Zhi-Gang Zhong; Xiang-Rong Du; Fei-Fei Zhang; Qing Guo; Ye Liu; Qiong-Yao Tang; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Ligand binding to the FA3-FA4 cleft inhibits the esterase-like activity of human serum albumin.

Authors:  Paolo Ascenzi; Loris Leboffe; Alessandra di Masi; Viviana Trezza; Gabriella Fanali; Magda Gioia; Massimo Coletta; Mauro Fasano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Neonatal pain management: still in search for the Holy Grail.

Authors:  Karel Allegaert; John N van den Anker
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.366

6.  Longrange PCR-based next-generation sequencing in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study of propofol among patients under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Oliwia Zakerska-Banaszak; Marzena Skrzypczak-Zielinska; Barbara Tamowicz; Adam Mikstacki; Michal Walczak; Michal Prendecki; Jolanta Dorszewska; Agnieszka Pollak; Urszula Lechowicz; Monika Oldak; Kinga Huminska-Lisowska; Marta Molinska-Glura; Marlena Szalata; Ryszard Slomski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The effect of UGT1A9, CYP2B6 and CYP2C9 genes polymorphism on individual differences in propofol pharmacokinetics among Polish patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Adam Mikstacki; Oliwia Zakerska-Banaszak; Marzena Skrzypczak-Zielinska; Barbara Tamowicz; Michał Prendecki; Jolanta Dorszewska; Marta Molinska-Glura; Malgorzata Waszak; Ryszard Slomski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics and anaesthetic drugs: Implications for perioperative practice.

Authors:  Arash Behrooz
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-10

Review 9.  Metabolic Profiles of Propofol and Fospropofol: Clinical and Forensic Interpretative Aspects.

Authors:  Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Safety of drug use in patients with a primary mitochondrial disease: An international Delphi-based consensus.

Authors:  Maaike C De Vries; David A Brown; Mitchell E Allen; Laurence Bindoff; Gráinne S Gorman; Amel Karaa; Nandaki Keshavan; Costanza Lamperti; Robert McFarland; Yi Shiau Ng; Mar O'Callaghan; Robert D S Pitceathly; Shamima Rahman; Frans G M Russel; Kristin N Varhaug; Tom J J Schirris; Michelangelo Mancuso
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.