Pierre Blais1, Nisreen Husain2, Jennifer R Kramer3, Marc Kowalkowski3, Hashem El-Serag4, Fasiha Kanwal4. 1. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 2. 1] Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA [2] Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 3. 1] Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA [2] Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. 1] Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA [2] Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA [3] Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and disease burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are increasing. Nonetheless, little is known about the processes related to identification, diagnosis, and referral of patients with NAFLD in routine clinical care. METHODS: Using automated data, we isolated a random sample of patients in a Veterans Administration facility who had ≥2 alanine transaminase (ALT) values >40 IU/ml >6 months apart in the absence of any positive results for hepatitis C RNA, hepatitis B surface antigen, or screens for excess alcohol use. We conducted a structured medical record review to confirm NAFLD and abstracted data from the primary care providers' notes for (i) recognition of abnormal ALT levels, (ii) mention of NAFLD as a possible diagnosis, (iii) recommendations for diet or exercise, and (d) referral to a specialist for further NAFLD evaluation. Using a multilevel logistic regression model, we identified patient demographic, clinical, comorbidity, and health-care utilization factors associated with recognition and receipt of early NAFLD care. RESULTS: Of 251 patients identified with NAFLD by our methods, 99 (39.4%) had documentation in medical record notes of abnormal ALT, 54 (21.5%) had NAFLD mentioned as a possible diagnosis, 37 (14.7%) were counseled regarding diet and exercise, and 26 (10.4%) were referred to a specialist. Only the magnitude of ALT elevation (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for ALT >80 IU/ml vs. <80 IU/ml=4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.65-7.30) and proportion of elevation (adjusted OR for >50% vs. <50% of ALT values >40 IU/ml=1.8, 95% CI=1.03-3.14) were associated with receiving specified NAFLD care. Only 3% of patients at a high risk of fibrosis (NAFLD fibrosis score >0.675) were referred to specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in care who may have NAFLD are not being recognized and evaluated for this condition. Our data suggest that providers may be using an incorrect heuristic in delivering NAFLD care by concentrating on those with high ALT levels.
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and disease burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are increasing. Nonetheless, little is known about the processes related to identification, diagnosis, and referral of patients with NAFLD in routine clinical care. METHODS: Using automated data, we isolated a random sample of patients in a Veterans Administration facility who had ≥2 alanine transaminase (ALT) values >40 IU/ml >6 months apart in the absence of any positive results for hepatitis C RNA, hepatitis B surface antigen, or screens for excess alcohol use. We conducted a structured medical record review to confirm NAFLD and abstracted data from the primary care providers' notes for (i) recognition of abnormal ALT levels, (ii) mention of NAFLD as a possible diagnosis, (iii) recommendations for diet or exercise, and (d) referral to a specialist for further NAFLD evaluation. Using a multilevel logistic regression model, we identified patient demographic, clinical, comorbidity, and health-care utilization factors associated with recognition and receipt of early NAFLD care. RESULTS: Of 251 patients identified with NAFLD by our methods, 99 (39.4%) had documentation in medical record notes of abnormal ALT, 54 (21.5%) had NAFLD mentioned as a possible diagnosis, 37 (14.7%) were counseled regarding diet and exercise, and 26 (10.4%) were referred to a specialist. Only the magnitude of ALT elevation (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for ALT >80 IU/ml vs. <80 IU/ml=4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.65-7.30) and proportion of elevation (adjusted OR for >50% vs. <50% of ALT values >40 IU/ml=1.8, 95% CI=1.03-3.14) were associated with receiving specified NAFLD care. Only 3% of patients at a high risk of fibrosis (NAFLD fibrosis score >0.675) were referred to specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in care who may have NAFLD are not being recognized and evaluated for this condition. Our data suggest that providers may be using an incorrect heuristic in delivering NAFLD care by concentrating on those with high ALT levels.
Authors: V Ratziu; P Giral; F Charlotte; E Bruckert; V Thibault; I Theodorou; L Khalil; G Turpin; P Opolon; T Poynard Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Mariana Lazo; Ruben Hernaez; Mark S Eberhardt; Susanne Bonekamp; Ihab Kamel; Eliseo Guallar; Ayman Koteish; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Pouneh Mofrad; Melissa J Contos; Mahmadul Haque; Carol Sargeant; Robert A Fisher; Velimir A Luketic; Richard K Sterling; Mitchell L Shiffman; Richard T Stravitz; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Paul Angulo; Jason M Hui; Giulio Marchesini; Ellisabetta Bugianesi; Jacob George; Geoffrey C Farrell; Felicity Enders; Sushma Saksena; Alastair D Burt; John P Bida; Keith Lindor; Schuyler O Sanderson; Marco Lenzi; Leon A Adams; James Kench; Terry M Therneau; Christopher P Day Journal: Hepatology Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: J B Kallman; A Arsalla; V Park; S Dhungel; P Bhatia; D Haddad; A Wheeler; Z M Younossi Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Sahil Mittal; Fasiha Kanwal; Jun Ying; Randy Chung; Yvonne H Sada; Sarah Temple; Jessica A Davila; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Fasiha Kanwal; Jennifer R Kramer; Srikar Mapakshi; Yamini Natarajan; Maneerat Chayanupatkul; Peter A Richardson; Liang Li; Roxanne Desiderio; Aaron P Thrift; Steven M Asch; Jinna Chu; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: I Doycheva; J Cui; P Nguyen; E A Costa; J Hooker; H Hofflich; R Bettencourt; S Brouha; C B Sirlin; R Loomba Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 8.171