Literature DB >> 24890030

Impact of source of infection and vancomycin AUC0-24/MICBMD targets on treatment failure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

N Ghosh1, R Chavada, M Maley, S J van Hal.   

Abstract

Despite recent controversies about toxicity and reduced efficacy, vancomycin remains the current treatment of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia. The parameter associated with treatment success is the vancomycin 24-h area under concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC0-24/MIC). We aimed to determine the utility of calculated AUCs and explore the optimal AUC0-24/MIC targets associated with treatment success. In this single-centre retrospective observational cohort study of 127 patients with MRSA bacteraemia, forty-five (35.4%) did not respond to vancomycin treatment. Patient characteristics were essentially the same between those who did not respond to vancomycin treatment and those with treatment success, with independent predictors of treatment failure being source of bacteraemia (odds ratio (OR), 4.29; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50-12.26; p 0.007) and not achieving an AUC0-24/MICBMD (using broth microdilution) target of ≥398 (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 4.57-28.46; p< 0.001). Bacteraemic source-specific thresholds were observed with a higher AUC0-24/MICBMD target of 440 required for high-risk sources (e.g. infective endocarditis) compared with 330 for low-risk sources (line related bacteraemia). Overall treatment success in patients with MRSA bacteraemia was associated with a vancomycin AUC0-24/MICBMD target of ≥398, with source-specific targets observed. Future vancomycin practice guidelines will need to take into account MIC methodology, source of bacteraemia and patient populations prior to setting targets and monitoring recommendations.
© 2014 The Authors Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2014 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Broth microdilution; Etest; creatinine clearance; minimum inhibitory concentration; pharmacodynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24890030     DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  14 in total

1.  Should Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin Based on Area under the Curve Become Standard Practice for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Association between vancomycin day 1 exposure profile and outcomes among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Anthony M Casapao; Thomas P Lodise; Susan L Davis; Kimberly C Claeys; Ravina Kullar; Donald P Levine; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Establishment of an AUC0-24 Threshold for Nephrotoxicity Is a Step towards Individualized Vancomycin Dosing for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  R Chavada; N Ghosh; I Sandaradura; M Maley; S J Van Hal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Exploring the Use of C-Reactive Protein to Estimate the Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin.

Authors:  Timothy M Rawson; Esmita Charani; Luke S P Moore; Mark Gilchrist; Pantelis Georgiou; William Hope; Alison H Holmes
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  The Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin.

Authors:  E J Filippone; W K Kraft; J L Farber
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Pharmacist-managed dose adjustment feedback using therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin was useful for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Ryuichi Hirano; Yuichi Sakamoto; Junichi Kitazawa; Shoji Yamamoto; Naoki Tachibana
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Matteo Bassetti; Hendrik Bracht; George Dimopoulos; Deborah Marriott; Michael N Neely; Jose-Artur Paiva; Federico Pea; Fredrik Sjovall; Jean F Timsit; Andrew A Udy; Sebastian G Wicha; Markus Zeitlinger; Jan J De Waele; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Association Between Vancomycin Area Under the Curve and Nephrotoxicity: a single center, retrospective cohort study in a veteran population.

Authors:  Anna Poston-Blahnik; Ryan Moenster
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 9.  Association between the AUC0-24/MIC Ratio of Vancomycin and Its Clinical Effectiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Men; Hui-Bo Li; Suo-Di Zhai; Rong-Sheng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Alosaimy; Noor L Sabagha; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Evan J Zasowski; Taylor Morrisette; Sarah C J Jorgensen; Trang D Trinh; Ryan P Mynatt; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.