Literature DB >> 24888634

Laboratory evolution of adenylyl cyclase independent learning in Drosophila and missing heritability.

M Cressy1, D Valente, A Altick, E Kockenmeister, K Honegger, H Qin, P P Mitra, J Dubnau.   

Abstract

Gene interactions are acknowledged to be a likely source of missing heritability in large-scale genetic studies of complex neurological phenotypes. However, involvement of rare variants, de novo mutations, genetic lesions that are not easily detected with commonly used methods and epigenetic factors also are possible explanations. We used a laboratory evolution study to investigate the modulatory effects of background genetic variation on the phenotypic effect size of a null mutation with known impact on olfactory learning. To accomplish this, we first established a population that contained variation at just 23 loci and used selection to evolve suppression of the learning defect seen with null mutations in the rutabaga adenylyl cyclase. We thus biased the system to favor relatively simplified outcomes by choosing a Mendelian trait and by restricting the genetic variation segregating in the population. This experimental design also assures that the causal effects are among the known 23 segregating loci. We observe a robust response to selection that requires the presence of the 23 variants. Analyses of the underlying genotypes showed that interactions between more than two loci are likely to be involved in explaining the selection response, with implications for the missing heritability problem.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenylyl cyclase; Drosophila; cAMP; cryptic variation; epistasis; laboratory evolution; learning; memory; missing heritability; selective breeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24888634      PMCID: PMC4108996          DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  32 in total

Review 1.  Understanding quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  N H Barton; P D Keightley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models.

Authors:  Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  The varieties of selectional experience in behavioral genetics.

Authors:  Ralph J Greenspan
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.250

4.  Whole-exome sequencing of 2,000 Danish individuals and the role of rare coding variants in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kirk E Lohmueller; Thomas Sparsø; Qibin Li; Ehm Andersson; Thorfinn Korneliussen; Anders Albrechtsen; Karina Banasik; Niels Grarup; Ingileif Hallgrimsdottir; Kristoffer Kiil; Tuomas O Kilpeläinen; Nikolaj T Krarup; Tune H Pers; Gaston Sanchez; Youna Hu; Michael Degiorgio; Torben Jørgensen; Annelli Sandbæk; Torsten Lauritzen; Søren Brunak; Karsten Kristiansen; Yingrui Li; Torben Hansen; Jun Wang; Rasmus Nielsen; Oluf Pedersen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Modifier genes in cystic fibrosis lung disease.

Authors:  Christian A Merlo; Michael P Boyle
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  2003-04

6.  Memory through metamorphosis in normal and mutant Drosophila.

Authors:  T Tully; V Cambiazo; L Kruse
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Loss of calcium/calmodulin responsiveness in adenylate cyclase of rutabaga, a Drosophila learning mutant.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; P P Sziber; W G Quinn
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Synaptic plasticity in Drosophila memory and hyperexcitable mutants: role of cAMP cascade.

Authors:  Y Zhong; V Budnik; C F Wu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Uncovering cryptic genetic variation.

Authors:  Greg Gibson; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Tully; W G Quinn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.