Literature DB >> 24888390

Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery.

Therese Krarup1, Lars Morten Holm, Morten la Cour, Hadi Kjaerbo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the amount of endothelial cell loss (ECL) and refractive predictability by femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) compared to conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPS).
METHODS: Forty-seven patients had one eye operated by FLACS and the contralateral eye operated by CPS (stop and chop technique). Both eyes had intraocular aspheric lenses implanted. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal endothelial cell count and hexagonality with a non-contact specular microscope were assessed preoperatively, 1-3 days postoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Three days postoperatively, mean ECL was 249 cells/mm(2) (SD ± 744) (9.1%) by FLACS and 235 cells/mm(2) (SD ± 681) (8.2%) by CPS (p = 0.87). Three months postoperatively, mean ECL was 274 cells/mm(2) (SD ± 358) (11.4%) by FLACS compared with 333 cells/mm(2) (SD ± 422) (13.9%) by CPS, (p = 0.30) 3 months postoperatively, hexagonality was decreased by 1.8% (SD ± 30) by FLACS and by 1.4% (SD ± 13) by CPS, (p = 0.84). The mean absolute difference from the attempted refraction was 0.37 dioptres (D) (SD ± 0.33) by FLACS and 0.41 D (SD ± 0.42) by CPS (p = 0.56). Mean CDVA was 0.89 (0.3; 1.25) by FLACS and 0.93 (0.4; 1.25) by CPS at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.36). Within both groups, 70% gained a CDVA of 6/6. Mean surgery time was 9.3 min (SD ± 1.9) by FLACS and 8.0 min (SD ± 1.9) by CPS, (p = 0.0018). Mean phaco energy was 3.78 U/S (SD ± 5.1) and 5.45 U/S (SD ± 4.6) (p < 0.0001) by FLACS and CPS, respectively.
CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in ECL and refractive predictability between FLACS and CPS 3 months postoperatively.
© 2014 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LensAR; cataract surgery; corneal endothelial cell loss; femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery; phaco energy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24888390     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  19 in total

1.  Influence of anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, axial length, and lens density on postoperative endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Anna Reuschel; Holger Bogatsch; Nicole Oertel; Renate Wiedemann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucia Bascaran; Txomin Alberdi; Itziar Martinez-Soroa; Cristina Sarasqueta; Javier Mendicute
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Safety and reliability of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for Japanese eyes.

Authors:  Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Manabu Hirasawa; Kunihiko Nakamura; Yuka Ota; Keiichiro Minami
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Complications of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy.

Authors:  Masaomi Kubota; Akira Watanabe; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Hideo Kono; Takaaki Hayashi; Tadashi Nakano
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Samuele Gigliola; Giancarlo Sborgia; Alfredo Niro; Carmela Palmisano; Pasquale Puzo; Gianluigi Giuliani; Luigi Sborgia; Dario Sisto; Valentina Pastore; Claudio Furino; Rossella Donghia; Alessandra Sborgia; Francesco Boscia; Giovanni Alessio
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Outcomes of conventional phacoemulsification versus femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Dagny C Zhu; Parth Shah; William J Feuer; Wei Shi; Ellen H Koo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  All laser cataract surgery compared to femtosecond laser phacoemulsification surgery: corneal trauma.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua; Peter A Mattei; Lisa Toto; Alessandra Mastropasqua; Luca Vecchiarino; Gennaro Falconio; Emanuele Doronzo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Emerging Technology in Refractive Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  João Saraiva; Kristin Neatrour; George O Waring Iv
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Chen; Wei Xiao; Shaobi Ye; Weirong Chen; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparing the Curative Effects between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinyi Chen; Kailin Chen; Jiliang He; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.