| Literature DB >> 24888316 |
Marzieh Qaraaty, Seyed Hamid Kamali1, Fataneh Hashem Dabaghian, Nafiseh Zafarghandi, Roshanak Mokaberinejad, Masumeh Mobli, Gholamreza Amin, Mohsen Naseri, Mohammad Kamalinejad, Mohsen Amin, Azizeh Ghaseminejad, Seyedeh Jihan HosseiniKhabiri, Daryush Talei.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) has been used in the Iranian Traditional Medicine as a treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding-menometrorrhagia. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of myrtle fruit syrup on abnormal uterine bleeding-menometrorrhagia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24888316 PMCID: PMC4079189 DOI: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-45
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
Figure 1Study flow chart.
Baseline characteristics of study subjects
| Age | 41.33 ± 7.228 | 41.13 ± 6.978 | 0.5 |
| BMI | 28.86 ± 4.68 | 31.99 ± 6.29 | 0.2 |
| MQ score | 47.8 ± 15.7 | 41.2 ± 15.3 | 0.2 |
| Duration of abnormality (month) | 53.93 ± 61.46 | 72.33 ± 69.92 | 0.3 |
The effect of myrtle fruit syrup in bleeding at baseline and post treatment
| Menstrual duration (day) | Intervention (n = 15) | Baseline | 10.6(2.7) | | | |
| After 1st cycle | 8.8(2.3) | 1.7(0.6) | -0.3- 3.8 | 0.08 | ||
| After 2nd cycle | 8.9(3.8) | 1.6(0.9) | -1.3- 4.7 | 0.08 | ||
| After 3rd cycle | 8.2(1.9) | 2.3(0.6) | 0.3- 4.3 | 0.01 | ||
| Placebo (n = 15) | Baseline | 9.8(3.5) | | | | |
| After 1st cycle | 8.8(3.2) | 1(0.5) | -0.7- 2.7 | 0.6 | ||
| After 2nd cycle | 8.7(2.6) | 1.1(0.6) | -0.8- 3.1 | 0.5 | ||
| After 3rd cycle | 8.6(3.2) | 1.2(0.4) | -0.08- 2.6 | 0.5 | ||
| Number of pads used | Intervention (n = 15) | Baseline | 22.7(12) | | | |
| After 1st cycle | 20(14) | 2.6(1.6) | -2.4--7.7 | 0.5 | ||
| After 2nd cycle | 21.4(17.9) | 1.3(2.7) | -7.1- 9.7 | 0.8 | ||
| After 3rd cycle | 16.4(10.7) | 6.3(1.5) | 1.6- 11 | 0.01 | ||
| Placebo (n = 15) | Baseline | 15.4(9.8) | | | | |
| After 1st cycle | 13.9(7.2) | 1.5(1.7) | -3.7- 6.8 | 0.6 | ||
| After 2nd cycle | 11.6(7.8) | 3.8(1.5) | -0.7- 8.4 | 01 | ||
| After 3rd cycle | 15(8.7) | 0.4(2) | -5.9- 6.7 | 0.9 | ||
| MQ score | Intervention (n = 15) | Baseline | 47.8(15.7) | | | |
| After 3 months | 39.4(16.7) | 8.4(3.7) | 0.4-16.4 | 0.02 | ||
| Placebo (n = 15) | Baseline | 41.2(15.3) | | | | |
| After 3 months | 39.2(14.5) | 2(2.03) | -2.3- 6.4 | 0.7 |
*One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the groups before and after each treatment with either placebo or extract. There was statistically significant difference between groups before and after three rounds of treatment with myrtle syrup, while the difference between groups before and after placebo treatment was not statistically significant.
**P values <0.05 are significant.