Literature DB >> 24887571

Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

Richard A Deyo1, Samuel F Dworkin, Dagmar Amtmann, Gunnar Andersson, David Borenstein, Eugene Carragee, John Carrino, Roger Chou, Karon Cook, Anthony DeLitto, Christine Goertz, Partap Khalsa, John Loeser, Sean Mackey, James Panagis, James Rainville, Tor Tosteson, Dennis Turk, Michael Von Korff, Debra K Weiner.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Therefore, NIH Pain Consortium charged a research task force to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum data set to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. The research task force believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurological, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. We expect that the research task force recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement. PERSPECTIVE: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for cLBP. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum data set, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24887571     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  24 in total

1.  The Canadian minimum dataset for chronic low back pain research: a cross-cultural adaptation of the National Institutes of Health Task Force Research Standards.

Authors:  Anaïs Lacasse; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Alexandre J Parent; Nioushah Noushi; Chúk Odenigbo; Gabrielle Pagé; Nicolas Beaudet; Manon Choinière; Laura S Stone; Mark A Ware
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 2.  Cell therapy for the degenerating intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Zhouyu Lu; Ling Qin; Robert L Mauck; Harvey E Smith; Lachlan J Smith; Neil R Malhotra; Martin F Heyworth; Franklin Caldera; Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto; Yejia Zhang
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Veteran Response to Dosage in Chiropractic Therapy (VERDICT): Study Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Cynthia R Long; Anthony J Lisi; Robert D Vining; Robert B Wallace; Stacie A Salsbury; Zacariah K Shannon; Stephanie Halloran; Amy L Minkalis; Lance Corber; Paul G Shekelle; Erin E Krebs; Thad E Abrams; Jon D Lurie; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Can a back pain screening tool help classify patients with acute pain into risk levels for chronic pain?

Authors:  W E Mehling; A L Avins; M C Acree; T S Carey; F M Hecht
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  A SMART design to determine the optimal treatment of chronic pain among military personnel.

Authors:  Diane Flynn; Linda H Eaton; Dale J Langford; Nicholas Ieronimakis; Honor McQuinn; Richard O Burney; Samuel L Holmes; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Classification of patients with incident non-specific low back pain: implications for research.

Authors:  Giulia Norton; Christine M McDonough; Howard J Cabral; Michael Shwartz; James F Burgess
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Health Care Resource Utilization and Management of Chronic, Refractory Low Back Pain in the United States.

Authors:  Charis A Spears; Sarah E Hodges; Musa Kiyani; Zidanyue Yang; Ryan M Edwards; Alexis Musick; Christine Park; Beth Parente; Hui-Jie Lee; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Long-Term Medicare Costs Associated With Opioid Analgesic Therapy vs Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain in a Cohort of Older Adults.

Authors:  James M Whedon; Anupama Kizhakkeveettil; Andrew Toler; Todd A MacKenzie; Jon D Lurie; Serena Bezdjian; Scott Haldeman; Eric Hurwitz; Ian Coulter
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Initial Choice of Spinal Manipulation Reduces Escalation of Care for Chronic Low Back Pain Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  James M Whedon; Anupama Kizhakkeveettil; Andrew Wj Toler; Serena Bezdjian; Daniel Rossi; Sarah Uptmor; Todd A MacKenzie; Jon D Lurie; Eric L Hurwitz; Ian Coulter; Scott Haldeman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Individuals with recurrent low back pain exhibit further altered frontal plane trunk control in remission than when in pain.

Authors:  Hai-Jung Steffi Shih; Linda R Van Dillen; Jason J Kutch; Kornelia Kulig
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.