Literature DB >> 24886998

Risk factors for donor endothelial loss in eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Yu-Chi Liu1, Carisa M Alvarez Paraz, Howard Yu Cajucom-Uy, Djoni Agahari, Selvam Sethuraman, Donald T-H Tan, Jodhbir S Mehta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate donor, tissue, and precut procedure risk factors for endothelial cell density (ECD) loss in posterior lamellar corneal tissue preparation by an eye bank for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
METHODS: A total of 259 corneoscleral rims precut by the Singapore Eye Bank from October 2011 to August 2013 were evaluated. Donor characteristics, tissue characteristics, and precut procedure parameters were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean donor age was 57.18 ± 11.35 years, and the mean cutting transition time was 4.16 ± 0.75 seconds. The mean ECD was 2826 ± 225 and 2787 ± 224 cells per square millimeter before and after precutting, respectively, with an average ECD change of -1.38% ± 3.28%. The precutting procedure failure rate was 1.2%. Mutivariate regression analysis showed that an older donor age, a higher ECD before cutting, and a slower cutting transition speed were significant factors. Corneas with an ECD >2800 cells per square millimeter before precutting, cutting transition time >5.5 seconds, and corneas with donor age >65 years were significantly more likely to have greater than 5% ECD loss after precutting (odds ratio, 6.42, 1.66, and 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-29.43, 1.45-2.72, and 1.66-5.82, respectively). Donor source, death-to-preservation time (range, 0.67-10.88 hours), death-to-precutting time (range, 0-7 days), and graft thickness (range, 43-232 μm) were not statistically significant factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The ECD loss in the precut tissue prepared by the eye bank was very low. The risk factors identified provide better understanding of how to improve the quality and safety profiles when preparing graft tissue for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24886998     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

1.  Precut cornea for Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: experience at a single eye bank.

Authors:  Ashik Mohamed; Sunita Chaurasia; Venkataswamy Chandragiri; Srinivas Kandhibanda; Srinivas Gunnam; Prashant Garg
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  A Novel Approach of Harvesting Viable Single Cells from Donor Corneal Endothelium for Cell-Injection Therapy.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Gary Peh; Dawn Jin Hui Neo; Heng-Pei Ang; Khadijah Adnan; Chan Lwin Nyein; Fernando Morales-Wong; Maninder Bhogal; Viridiana Kocaba; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 1-Year Outcomes of Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Liu; Melina Setiawan; Jia Ying Chin; Benjamin Wu; Hon Shing Ong; Ecosse Lamoureux; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-17

4.  Cost Minimization Analysis of Precut Cornea Grafts in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kai-Ling Yong; Hai V Nguyen; Howard Y Cajucom-Uy; Valencia Foo; Donald Tan; Eric A Finkelstein; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.