| Literature DB >> 24886971 |
Giovanni Barone1, Mirta Corsello, Patrizia Papacci, Francesca Priolo, Costantino Romagnoli, Enrico Zecca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ability to maintain a normal body temperature in an open crib is an important physiologic competency generally requested to discharge preterm infants from the hospital. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of an early weaning protocol from incubator in preterm newborns in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24886971 PMCID: PMC4026828 DOI: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-41
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
Baseline characteristics
| 80 (79.2%) | 21 (20.8%) | | |
| 30.3 ± 2.5 | 27.5 ± 2.1 | < 0.0001 | |
| (24 – 35) | (23 – 31) | ||
| 1198 ± 270 | 894 ± 251 | < 0.0001 | |
| (450 – 1590) | (475 – 1520) | ||
| 39 (48.7%) | 9 (42.9%) | 0.81 | |
| 19 (23.7%) | 5 (23.8%) | 1 | |
| 0 | 3 (14.3%) | < 0.0001 | |
| 5 (6.3%) | 11 (52.4%) | < 0.0001 | |
| 4 (5%) | 4 (19.0%) | < 0.05 | |
| 0 | 7 (33.3%) | < 0.0001 |
EW early weaning; DW delayed weaning; GA gestational age; BW birth weight; SGA small for gestational age.
Relevant data from incubator weaning to discharge home
| 1621 ± 29 | 2047 ± 282 | < 0.0001 | |
| (1520 – 1690) | (1700 – 2670) | ||
| 8.6 ± 4.9 | 16.7 ± 19.2 | 0.0014 | |
| (2 – 25) | (2 – 76) | ||
| 35 | 78 | < 0.0001 | |
| (26.5 - 50) | (64.2 – 121.2) | ||
| 35.9 ± 1.9 | 40.2 ± 4.2 | < 0.0001 | |
| (33 – 44.5) | (34.3 – 50) | ||
| 1881 ± 169 | 2565 ± 541 | < 0.0001 | |
| (1565 - 2515) | (1850 - 3620) | ||
| 17.5 ± 4.8 | 11.1 ± 7.3 | < 0.0001 | |
| (7 – 32.5) | (-8.8 – 24.2) |
EW early weaning; DW delayed weaning; LOS length of stay; GV growth velocity.
Relevant data in the follow-up week
| 1974 ± 188 | 2321 ± 335 | < 0.0001 | |
| (1590 – 2580) | (1920 – 2950) | ||
| 12.3 ± 9.9 | 4.9 ± 6.0 | 0.0323 | |
| (-12-45) | (-5-15) | ||
| 2080 ± 228 | 2406 ± 290 | 0.0002 | |
| (1620 – 2900) | (1960– 2920) | ||
| 14.5 ± 8.4 | 8.2 ± 7.8 | 0.0351 | |
| (0-55) | (-5-22) | ||
| 2 (2.5) | 1 (7.7) | 0.50 |
EW early weaning; DW delayed weaning; GV growth velocity.
Figure 1Distribution of gestational age in the early weaning (EW) and the delayed weaning group (DW).
Comparison with historical controls
| 101 | 120 | | |
| 29.7 ± 2.6 | 29.4 ± 2.5 | 0.3767 | |
| (23 – 35) | (23 – 36) | ||
| 1135 ± 292 | 1138 ± 284 | 0.9365 | |
| (450 – 1590) | (500 – 1590) | ||
| 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 0.847 | |
| 48 (47.5%) | 63 (52.5%) | 0.500 | |
| 24 (23.8%) | 35 (29.1%) | 0.446 | |
| 40 | 46.5 | 0.0163 | |
| (29.5-61.7) | (37-65.5) | ||
| 36.8 ± 3.0 | 37.8 ± 2.7 | 0.0131 | |
| (33.0-50.0) | (35.0-50.0) |
SG study group; CG control group; GA gestational age; BW birth weight; SGA small for gestational age; LOS length of stay.