| Literature DB >> 24885884 |
Gervais Rioux, Claudia Mathieu, Alexis Russell, Marilène Bolduc, Marie-Eve Laliberté-Gagné, Pierre Savard, Denis Leclerc1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trivalent inactivated flu vaccines (TIV) are currently the best means to prevent influenza infections. However, the protection provided by TIV is partial (about 50%) and it is needed to improve the efficacy of protection. Since the respiratory tract is the main site of influenza replications, a vaccine that triggers mucosal immunity in this region can potentially improve protection against this disease. Recently, PapMV nanoparticles used as an adjuvant in a formulation with TIV administered by the subcutaneous route have shown improving the immune response directed to the TIV and protection against an influenza challenge.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24885884 PMCID: PMC4022981 DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-12-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Figure 1Structure of the PapMV nanoparticles. PapMV nanoparticles were observed with a transmission electron microscope and by dynamic light scattering. PapMV nanoparticles have a filamentous rod-shape structure (A) with an average length of 100 nm as shown by dynamic light scattering (B).
Figure 2PapMV nanoparticles improve the mucosal antibody response against TIV and NP in the lungs. Balb/C mice (10/group) were vaccinated twice at a 14-day interval with TIV alone or adjuvanted by PapMV nanoparticles by intranasal (i.n.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) routes. Bronchoalveolar lavages were performed at day 28 and ELISA were conducted to evaluate the levels of total IgG (A), IgG2a (B) or IgA (C) against TIV and IgG2a against NP (D). Titers against TIV or GST-NP were not detected in the blood or BAL of PapMV nanoparticles or buffer vaccinated mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3PapMV nanoparticles improve the systemic antibody response against TIV and NP. Balb/C mice (10/group) were vaccinated twice at a 14-day interval with TIV alone or adjuvanted with PapMV nanoparticles by intranasal (i.n.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) routes. Bleedings were performed at day 28 and ELISA were conducted to evaluate the levels of total IgG (A), IgG2a (B) or IgA (C) against TIV and IgG2a against NP (D). Titers against TIV or GST-NP were not detected in the blood or BAL of PapMV nanoparticles or buffer vaccinated mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Mice vaccinated with PapMV nanoparticles adjuvanted TIV showed an increased protection to an influenza challenge with influenza strain normally lethal to TIV vaccinated mice. Mice vaccinated twice with TIV adjuvanted or not by PapMV nanoparticles by intranasal (i.n.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) routes were challenged with 250 pfu of A/WSN/1933 (H1N1) influenza virus. Mice were monitored for weight loss (A), symptoms levels (B) and survival (C) for 14 days. Statistical analysis is applied between groups of the same immunization ways. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.