| Literature DB >> 24885168 |
Angela M Minassian1, Robert Newnham, Elizabeth Kalimeris, Philip Bejon, Bridget L Atkins, Ian C J W Bowler.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) automated BACTEC™ blood culture bottle methods have comparable sensitivity, specificity and a shorter time to positivity than traditional cooked meat enrichment broth methods. We evaluate the culture incubation period required to maximise sensitivity and specificity of microbiological diagnosis, and the ability of BACTEC™ to detect slow growing Propionibacteria spp.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24885168 PMCID: PMC4101863 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Flowchart: route to determination of infection (n = no. of patients). “Culture-positive” refers to patients with indistinguishable isolates from 2 or more samples. “Gold standard infection” is defined as one or more histological AND/OR clinical criteria.
Figure 2Time to positivity (TTP) (days) by organism: data for aerobic (a) and anaerobic (b) positive cultures shown separately, for ALL isolates grown from all 1328 periprosthetic samples. Data include no determination of whether or not “gold standard infection”. N = 360 means 360 of the 455 isolates flagged in the aerobic bottle; N = 350 means 350 of the 455 isolates flagged in the anaerobic bottle.
Figure 3Number of isolates flagging in one or both BACTEC™ bottles (aerobic, Oand anaerobic, AnO), by organism type. Graph shows that a significant proportion of isolates would remain undetected without dual culture conditions in parallel.
Sensitivity and specificity of BACTEC using “gold standard” definition for infection
| 1 day | Present | 53 | 26 | 79 | 67.1 (55.6-77.3) | |
| | Absent | 1 | 242 | 243 | | 99.6 (97.7-100) |
| 2 days | Present | 64 | 15 | 79 | 81.0 (70.6-89.0) | |
| | Absent | 2 | 241 | 243 | | 99.2 (97.1-99.9) |
| 3 days | Present | 65 | 14 | 79 | 82.3 (72.1-90.0) | |
| | Absent | 3 | 240 | 243 | | 98.8 (96.4-99.7) |
| 4 days | Present | 65 | 14 | 79 | 82.3 (72.1-90.0) | |
| | Absent | 4 | 239 | 243 | | 98.4 (95.8-99.5) |
| 5 days | Present | 65 | 14 | 79 | 82.3 (72.1-09.0) | |
| | Absent | 7 | 236 | 243 | | 97.1 (94.2-98.8) |
| 6 days | Present | 65 | 14 | 79 | 82.3 (72.1-90.0) | |
| | Absent | 7 | 236 | 243 | | 97.1 (94.2-98.8) |
| 7 days | Present | 65 | 14 | 79 | 82.3 (72.1-90.0) | |
| | Absent | 7 | 236 | 243 | | 97.1 (94.2-98.8) |
| 8 days | Present | 66 | 13 | 79 | 83.5 (73.5-90.9) | |
| Absent | 7 | 236 | 243 | 97.1 (94.2-98.8) | ||
Sensitivity and specificity for each time-point (incubation period) are shown in percentages with 95% confidence intervals. “Culture + ve” refers to patients with 2 or more samples positive with the same organism. “Culture –ve” refers to the rest.
Figure 4Sensitivity by culture incubation period, all cases (N = 79): graph shows the proportion culture positive (solid black bars) among cases, by incubation period. Numbers above the bars relate to culture positive cases.