| Literature DB >> 24885138 |
Fan Zhang, Xiu-Fang Ma, Yong-Ming Gao, Xian-Bin Hao, Zhi-Kang Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cold stress is an important factor limiting rice yield in many areas of high latitude and altitude. Considerable efforts have been taken to genetically dissect cold tolerance (CT) in rice using DNA markers. Because of possible epistasis and gene × environment interactions associated with identified quantitative trait loci, the results of these genetic studies have unfortunately not been directly applicable to marker-assisted selection for improved rice CT. In this study, we demonstrated the utility of a selective introgression strategy for simultaneous improvement and genetic dissection of rice seedling CT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24885138 PMCID: PMC4024214 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-55
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Results of screening for seedling cold tolerance (CT) of four BC F populations derived from crosses between C418 ( ) and four donors and introgression patterns of the resultant 30 verified cold-tolerant introgression lines
| A | Zihui100 | 800 | 8 | 1.0 | 6 | 0.086 | 0.179 | 0.175 |
| B | Bg300 | 800 | 11 | 1.4 | 6 | 0.035 | 0.373 | 0.222 |
| C | Cisanggarung | 800 | 15 | 1.9 | 13 | 0.086 | 0.289 | 0.231 |
| D | Manawthukha | 800 | 7 | 0.9 | 5 | 0.018 | 0.315 | 0.176 |
| Average | 800 | 10.3 | 1.3 | 7.5 | 0.056 | 0.289 | 0.201 |
1N1 is the original size of the BC2F2 population used for screening seedling CT. N2 is the number of surviving plants selected from each population after exposure at the seedling stage to a 20-d cold treatment. N3 is the number of selected BC progeny with significantly improved CT as confirmed by progeny testing of their derived BC2F6 ILs under 7-d cold treatment in a phytotron at the seedling stage. SI is the selection intensity.
2B, H and IF are frequencies of the donor homozygote, heterozygote, and donor introgression, respectively, in the selected CT ILs.
Results of progeny testing of 41 cold-tolerant BC F individuals from four BC populations based on survival percentages (SPs) of their derived BC F progeny evaluated under conditions of 4°C for 7 d in a growth chamber
| ZH100 | 031 K85 | A-IL1 | 1 | | 30.0 ± n.a.** | 81.0 ± n.a. | 75.4 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K86 | A-IL2 | 2 | | 46.1 ± 25.6** | 80.3 ± 11.0 | 75.0 ± 16.0 |
| | 031 K89 | A-IL3 | 5 | √ | 23.7 ± 18.4* | 88.5 ± 23.4 | 88.5 ± 35.3 |
| | 031 K90 | A-IL4 | 2 | | 40.3 ± 0.2** | 100.7 ± 20.7 | 102.4 ± 10.6 |
| | 031 K92 | A-IL5 | 5 | √ | 41.4 ± 26.7** | 91.7 ± 10.2 | 101.9 ± 33.8 |
| | 031 K97 | A-IL6 | 1 | | 66.0 ± n.a.** | 75.9 ± n.a. | 59.4 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K96 | - | 1 | | 9.7 ± n.a. | 95.5 ± n.a. | 82.4 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K101 | - | 1 | | 10.0 ± n.a. | 70.9 ± n.a. | 82.5 ± n.a. |
| Bg300 | 031 K188 | B-IL1 | 26 | √ | 66.6 ± 30.2** | 87.5 ± 12.4 | 114.1 ± 30.8 |
| | 031 K187 | B-IL2 | 10 | | 23.8 ± 9.5* | 83.8 ± 9.4 | 113.6 ± 31.6 |
| | 031 K190 | B-IL3 | 5 | | 40.2 ± 4.0** | 82.5 ± 9.7 | 134.2 ± 30.6 |
| | 031 K195 | B-IL4 | 11 | √ | 20.7 ± 22.3* | 76.3 ± 7.0 | 97.4 ± 19.0 |
| | 031 K196 | B-IL5 | 8 | √ | 17.2 ± 22.2* | 72.1 ± 6.1 | 97.7 ± 20.7 |
| | 031 K189 | B-IL6 | 2 | | 41.5 ± 0.8** | 71.7 ± 7.9 | 90.9 ± 3.8 |
| | 031 K186 | - | 1 | | 0.0 ± n.a. | 78.0 ± n.a. | 82.1 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K191 | - | 6 | | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 86.1 ± 7.0 | 117.5 ± 35.4 |
| | 031 K192 | - | 1 | | 0.0 ± n.a. | 82.2 ± n.a. | 90.8 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K193 | - | 5 | | 17.2 ± 13.4 | 88.6 ± 15.1 | 117.5 ± 17.7 |
| | 031 K194 | - | 6 | | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 81.6 ± 12.2 | 98.5 ± 14.0 |
| Cis | 031 K155 | C-IL1 | 7 | √ | 30.2 ± 22.2** | 81.6 ± 16.9 | 88.3 ± 30.7 |
| | 031 K156 | C-IL2 | 14 | √ | 22.2 ± 23.6* | 73.5 ± 13.1 | 77.1 ± 17.5 |
| | 031 K158 | C-IL3 | 11 | √ | 46.5 ± 35.5** | 79.4 ± 8.6 | 74.1 ± 19.7 |
| | 031 K159 | C-IL4 | 1 | | 95.4 ± n.a.** | 90.2 ± n.a. | 106.0 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K160 | C-IL5 | 5 | | 82.2 ± 20.7** | 78.8 ± 7.7 | 86.5 ± 26.7 |
| | 031 K161 | C-IL6 | 2 | | 85.1 ± 0.3** | 89.9 ± 5.8 | 113.7 ± 27.3 |
| | 031 K162 | C-IL7 | 3 | | 66.0 ± 4.3** | 84.0 ± 4.3 | 79.0 ± 30.9 |
| | 031 K163 | C-IL8 | 1 | | 74.6 ± n.a.** | 76.3 ± n.a. | 59.2 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K165 | C-IL9 | 2 | | 79.2 ± 23.9** | 79.1 ± 20.8 | 80.4 ± 16.8 |
| | 031 K168 | C-IL10 | 1 | | 68.6 ± n.a.** | 67.3 ± n.a. | 73.8 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K170 | C-IL11 | 1 | | 78.2 ± n.a.** | 96.0 ± n.a. | 90.1 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K171 | C-IL12 | 4 | | 69.5 ± 16.3** | 76.5 ± 5.2 | 92.3 ± 17.0 |
| | 031 K172 | C-IL13 | 1 | | 53.3 ± n.a.** | 72.4 ± n.a. | 92.4 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K166 | - | 1 | | 14.3 ± n.a. | 91.1 ± n.a. | 55.9 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K157 | - | 1 | | 15.8 ± n.a. | 65.1 ± n.a. | 82.0 ± n.a. |
| MNTH | 031 K5 | D-IL1 | 3 | | 67.6 ± 28.2** | 85.7 ± 22.6 | 166.9 ± 55.7 |
| | 031 K12 | D-IL2 | 2 | | 52.8 ± 3.2** | 65.5 ± 2.7 | 89.7 ± 6.9 |
| | 031 K20 | D-IL3 | 6 | | 49.8 ± 12.9** | 70.9 ± 7.5 | 84.8 ± 3.4 |
| | 031 K21 | D-IL4 | 2 | | 46.6 ± 27.5** | 63.9 ± 15.1 | 88.3 ± 37.9 |
| | 031 K22 | D-IL5 | 6 | √ | 43.4 ± 16.0** | 78.3 ± 6.4 | 90.6 ± 19.2 |
| | 031 K8 | - | 1 | | 7.8 ± n.a. | 74.8 ± n.a. | 90.4 ± n.a. |
| | 031 K15 | - | 3 | | 11.9 ± 5.0 | 63.6 ± 21.2 | 41.0 ± 0.6 |
| C418 | 13.1 ± 7.1 | 73.9 ± n.a. | 77.6 ± n.a. | ||||
1ZH100, Cis, and MNTH represent Zihui100, Cisanggarung, and Manawthukha, respectively.
2“√” indicates that the two groups of BC2F2:6 ILs derived from the same BC2F2 individual had distinct CT phenotypes according to the two-sample proportion test.
3* and ** indicate that the SPs of BC2F2:6 ILs were significantly higher than the average SP of recurrent parent C418 at P < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively, according to the contrast test.
4SH and SDW are seedling height (in cm) and seedling dry weight (in g), respectively, under natural low-temperature stress.
Genomic information for 29 functional genetic units (FGUs) (17 single loci and 12 association groups or AGs) for seedling cold tolerance (CT) detected by χ tests (single loci) and multi-locus linkage disequilibrium analyses in 30 cold-tolerant introgression lines (ILs) selected from four BC F populations derived from crosses between the recurrent parent (C418) and four donors (ZH100, Bg300, Cis, and MNTH)
| C418/ZH100 (A) | | 7.1 | RM4584 | 0.917 | 1.000 | 3.4 × 10−14 | | | |
| 1.11 | RM1196 | 0.583 | 0.833 | 2.2 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 1.15 | RM1297 | 0.500 | 0.833 | 1.1 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 4.12 | RM2521 | 0.750 | 0.833 | 5.1 × 10−9 | | | [ | ||
| 9.6 | RM1896 | 0.750 | 0.833 | 5.1 × 10−9 | | | | ||
| 6.3 | RM5754 | 0.417 | 0.667 | 8.7 × 10−3 | A-IL5 | 0.0228 | [ | ||
| 6.15 | RM5463 | 0.500 | 0.667 | 4.5 × 10−3 | A-IL5 | 0.0228 | [ | ||
| | 7.9 | RM6835 | 0.500 | 0.833 | 4.5 × 10−3 | | | [ | |
| | 7.12 | RM5847 | 0.583 | 0.833 | 2.2 × 10−4 | | | | |
| C418/Bg300 (B) | 2.6 | RM324 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 7.6 × 10−10 | | | | |
| 5.10 | RM164 | 0.583 | 1.000 | 3.1 × 10−7 | B-IL5 | 0.0416 | [ | ||
| 12.5 | RM101 | 0.583 | 1.000 | 3.1 × 10−7 | | | [ | ||
| 2.4 | RM145 | 0.500 | 0.833 | 1.1 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 2.11 | RM262 | 0.500 | 0.833 | 1.1 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 7.10 | RM432 | 0.417 | 0.833 | 1.0 × 10−6 | | | [ | ||
| 8.2 | RM38 | 0.417 | 0.833 | 1.0 × 10−6 | | | [ | ||
| 3.5 | RM7 | 0.500 | 0.833 | 1.1 × 10−4 | B-IL1 | 0.0368 | [ | ||
| 6.3 | RM253 | 0.583 | 0.833 | 2.2 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 9.9 | RM257 | 0.500 | 0.833 | 1.1 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 1.5 | RM579 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | B-IL4 | 0.0289 | [ | ||
| 3.12 | RM6832 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | B-IL5 | 0.0416 | [ | ||
| 5.15 | RM334 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | | | | ||
| 6.12 | RM275 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | B-IL5 | 0.0072 | [ | ||
| 10.3 | RM216 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | B-IL4/B-IL5 | 0.0289/0.0072 | [ | ||
| 10.9 | RM1375 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | B-IL4 | 0.0480 | [ | ||
| 11.14 | RM224 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | B-IL4/B-IL5 | 0.0082/0.0416 | | ||
| | 8.14 | RM447 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | | | [ | |
| | 12.2 | RM247 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 3.1 × 10−4 | | | | |
| C418/Cis (C) | | 7.2 | RM5711 | 0.538 | 1.000 | 2.1 × 10−17 | | | |
| 6.15 | RM3307 | 0.577 | 0.846 | 8.3 × 10−9 | | | [ | ||
| 10.9 | RM1873 | 0.577 | 0.846 | 8.3 × 10−9 | | | [ | ||
| | 12.1 | RM6973 | 0.385 | 0.692 | 4.7 × 10−7 | | | | |
| | 2.18 | RM3850 | 0.308 | 0.615 | 5.7 × 10−7 | | | | |
| | 6.3 | RM5754 | 0.539 | 0.923 | 2.3 × 10−12 | C-IL2 | 0.0041 | [ | |
| 3.8 | RM6959 | 0.423 | 0.769 | 3.5 × 10−9 | | | | ||
| 3.16 | RM3199 | 0.423 | 0.769 | 3.5 × 10−9 | C-IL1 | 0.0228 | | ||
| 9.1 | RM3609 | 0.538 | 0.769 | 3.6 × 10−7 | C-IL2 | 0.0055 | | ||
| | 4.17 | RM6238 | 0.462 | 0.692 | 1.0 × 10−7 | | | [ | |
| | 4.12 | RM2521 | 0.308 | 0.538 | 1.0 × 10−3 | | | [ | |
| | 11.10 | RM5349 | 0.308 | 0.615 | 5.7 × 10−7 | | | [ | |
| | 3.2 | RM3126 | 0.654 | 0.923 | 3.7 × 10−11 | | | | |
| | 3.18 | RM3329 | 0.346 | 0.538 | 3.1 × 10−5 | C-IL3 | 0.0283 | [ | |
| 7.8 | RM5875 | 0.500 | 0.769 | 4.8 × 10−7 | | | [ | ||
| 8.2 | RM1148 | 0.462 | 0.769 | 1.0 × 10−7 | | | [ | ||
| 2.12 | RM3688 | 0.346 | 0.615 | 3.1 × 10−5 | C-IL2 | 0.0055 | [ | ||
| 11.4 | RM3133 | 0.308 | 0.615 | 5.7 × 10−7 | | | | ||
| | 5.1 | RM1200 | 0.308 | 0.615 | 5.7 × 10−7 | | | [ | |
| | 2.4 | RM5459 | 0.462 | 0.615 | 7.8 × 10−5 | | | [ | |
| C418/MNTH (D) | 4.3 | RM3658 | 0.700 | 1.000 | 1.5 × 10−5 | | | [ | |
| 9.9 | RM6235 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 2.5 × 10−8 | | | [ | ||
| 6.12 | RM6298 | 0.400 | 0.800 | 3.0 × 10−5 | | | [ | ||
| 7.5 | RM5436 | 0.400 | 0.800 | 3.0 × 10−5 | | | [ | ||
| 9.3 | RM5899 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 7.3 × 10−4 | | | | ||
| 10.10 | RM1146 | 0.600 | 0.800 | 7.3 × 10−4 | | | [ | ||
| 11.2 | RM1812 | 0.400 | 0.800 | 3.0 × 10−5 | | | | ||
| 11.9 | RM1355 | 0.400 | 0.800 | 3.0 × 10−5 | | | [ | ||
| 5.12 | RM5970 | 0.400 | 0.800 | 3.0 × 10−5 | D-IL5 | 0.0416 | [ | ||
1An AG is defined as a group of unlinked but perfectly associated loci showing equal introgression in selected cold-tolerant ILs from each BC population as detected by linkage disequilibrium analysis [28].
2IF = introgression (donor) allelic frequency.
3FG is the frequency of functional genotypes (donor homozygote and the heterozygote).
4Two-sample Z tests to compare the proportions of two groups of BC2F6 ILs derived from the same BC2F2 individual but with significantly different CT phenotypes (SP) was performed using SAS [27].
Figure 1Genomic distribution into 48 bins of 57 loci in 29 functional genetic units (FGUs) underlying seedling cold tolerance (CT) in 30 introgression lines (ILs) from four BCFpopulations of rice. Boxes on the right side of each chromosome are FGUs detected in cold-tolerant ILs; symbols on the left are main-effect QTLs and epistatic QTLs associated with CT previously reported in other rice populations (Table 3; Additional file 1: Table S4). CT-related genes harbored in or near FGU regions are shown on the left side of each chromosome. Boxes with thicker outlines indicate FGUs verified by comparison of introgression frequencies between two groups of BC2F2:6 ILs with contrasting CT phenotypes derived from the same BC2F2 plants. Colored bins indicate FGUs of high introgression that are very likely to be upstream regulatory genes in the genetic networks (Figure 2A–D) according to molecular quantitative genetics theory [26]. Regions in rectangular boxes represent linked bins detected in multiple populations.
Figure 2Putative genetic networks underlying rice seedling cold tolerance (CT) detected in 30 cold-tolerant introgression lines (ILs) from four BCpopulations. (A) Genetic network consisting of five functional genetic units (FGUs) and their graphic genotypes in six cold-tolerant ILs from the C418/Zihui100 population. (B) Genetic network consisting of six FGUs and their graphic genotypes in six cold-tolerant ILs from the C418/Bg300 population. (C) Genetic network comprising 15 FGUs detected in 13 cold-tolerant ILs from the C418/Cisanggarung population. (D) Genetic network consisting of three FGUs and their graphic genotypes in five cold-tolerant ILs from the C418/Manawthukha population. In graphical genotypes of each network, unfilled and fully colored cells represent the recipient homozygote and donor functional genotypes (donor homozygote plus the heterozygote), respectively. Numbers in cells of graphic genotypes are the number of loci included in the FGU (1 represents a single locus, while ≥ 2 represents an association group, AG). Here, an AG represents a group of unlinked but perfectly associated loci as shown in Table 3.