| Literature DB >> 24885128 |
Andréa S Almeida1, Guilherme L Werneck.
Abstract
Spatial heterogeneity in the incidence of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an important aspect to be considered in planning control actions for the disease. The objective of this study was to predict areas at high risk for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) based on socioeconomic indicators and remote sensing data. We applied classification and regression trees to develop and validate prediction models. Performance of the models was assessed by means of sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve. The model developed was able to discriminate 15 subsets of census tracts (CT) with different probabilities of containing CT with high risk of VL occurrence. The model presented, respectively, in the validation and learning samples, sensitivity of 79% and 52%, specificity of 75% and 66%, and area under the ROC curve of 83% and 66%. Considering the complex network of factors involved in the occurrence of VL in urban areas, the results of this study showed that the development of a predictive model for VL might be feasible and useful for guiding interventions against the disease, but it is still a challenge as demonstrated by the unsatisfactory predictive performance of the model developed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24885128 PMCID: PMC4046095 DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Health Geogr ISSN: 1476-072X Impact factor: 3.918
Figure 1Average annual incidence rate of visceral leishmaniasis in (a) 1993–1996 and in (b) 2001–2006, in the census tracts of Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Socioeconomic indicators selected for analysis
| PMENILLITE1 | Percentage of illiterate men |
| PPOPILLITE1 | Percentage of illiterate population |
| AVERAINCOME1 | Average nominal income of head of the household |
| RINCOME1 | Income ratio - Ratio between total income of upper decile/total income of the poorest 40% |
| RSEX1 | Ratio between men population/women population * 100 |
| RDEPEND1 | Ratio between persons from 0 to 14 and 60 or more years old /15 to 59 years old * 100 |
| PYOUNG5YEARS1 | Percentage of the population that is younger than 5 years old |
| PPOORHEAD1 | Percentage of heads of households with income up to 1/2 Brazilian minimum wage (MW) |
| PINCOMHEAD3MW1 | Percentage of heads of households with income up to 3 Brazilian minimum wage (MW) |
| PILLITEHEAD1 | Percentage of heads of households that are literate |
| PILLITEMENHEAD1 | Percentage of heads of households that are men |
| PHEADWLESS31 | Percentage of heads of households with less than 3 years of schooling |
| P HEADWLESS71 | Percentage of heads of households with less than 7 years of schooling |
| P3RESHOUSE1 | Percentage of households with up to 3 residents |
| P4 RESHOUSE1 | Percentage of households with up to 4 residents |
| P5 RESHOUSE1 | Percentage of households with up to 5 residents |
| PHOUSEWSAN1 | Percentage of households without sewage system |
| PHOUSEWITHSAN2 | Percentage of households with sewage system connected to the public network |
| PHOUSEWATER3 | Percentage of households with water supply connected to the public network |
| PHOUSEGARBA2 | Percentage of households with garbage collection |
| MEANPEOPLE1 | Mean number of persons per household |
| R1 | Rate of population growth |
1Categorized according to the quartile of the distribution.
2Categorized by the median.
3Categorized according to the tercile of the distribution.
Environmental indicators selected for analysis
| WATER | Proportion of the census tract area covered by water collections (WATER CAT: ≥ 0–10; 10–100) |
| DENSEVEG | Proportion of the census tract area covered by dense vegetation (DENSEVEG CAT: ≥ 0–1; 1–10; 10–100) |
| UNDERGROWTH | Proportion of the census tract area covered by pasture and shrubs (UNDERGROWTH CAT: ≥ 0–10; 10–20; 20–100) |
| DENSEURB | Proportion of the census tract area characterized as residential with little vegetation (DENSEURB CAT: ≥ 0–10; 10–40; 40–80; 80–100) |
| GREENURB | Proportion of the census tract area characterized as sparse residential with much vegetation (GREENURB CAT: ≥ 0–10; 10–40; 40–90; 90–100) |
| EXPOSOIL | Proportion of the census tract area covered by bare soil – dirt, mud, sand (EXPOSOIL CAT: ≥ 0–1; 1–2; 2–4; 4–6; 6–10; 10–100) |
Figure 2Classification of land coverage results in Teresina, derived from the image processing of the satellite Landsat 5 TM of 1990 (a) and 2003 (b). Piauí, Brazil
Figure 3Diagram of the best predictive model obtained from the learning sample (1993–1996). The frames in red correspond to terminal nodes with probability (P) and the number of CT (N). Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
Predictive performance of the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model on the learning sample (1993–1996) and validation sample (2001–2006) and their confidence intervals
| 83 | 79 | 74 | 75 | 50 | 92 | |
| (79–88) | (71–87) | (69–78) | (71–79) | (42–58) | (87–95) | |
| 66 | 52 | 66 | 62 | 36 | 79 | |
| (61–70) | (45–60) | (61–70) | (58–66) | (30–42) | (75–83) |
Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.