| Literature DB >> 24884795 |
George Serhan, Colin M Stack, Gabriel G Perrone, Charles Oliver Morton1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a pressing need to identify novel antifungal drug targets to aid in the therapy of life-threatening mycoses and overcome increasing drug resistance. Identifying specific mechanisms of action of membrane-interacting antimicrobial drugs on the model fungus Saccharomyces cerevisiae is one avenue towards addressing this issue. The S. cerevisiae deletion mutants Δizh2, Δizh3, Δaif1 and Δstm1 were demonstrated to be resistant to amphibian-derived antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). The purpose of this study was to examine whether AMPs and polyene antifungals have a similar mode of action; this was done by comparing the relative tolerance of the mutants listed above to both classes of antifungal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24884795 PMCID: PMC4036090 DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-13-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Figure 1The effects of exposure to polyene antifungals on the wild-type and selected deletion mutants of . The effect of drug was determined by expressing each treatment as a percentage of control growth to account for variations in starting cell numbers between treatments and experiments. (a-b)Saccharomyces cerevisiae was exposed to two concentrations of amphotericin B; 1.0 μg ml−1 and 2.0 μg ml−1 for one, two and three hours. The number of viable cells reduced over time for each strain, however Δizh2 and Δizh3 were significantly more resistant than the wild-type and other strains tested at all doses. (c-d)S. cerevisiae was exposed to two concentrations of nystatin; 2.5 μg ml−1 and 5.0 μg ml−1 for one, two and three hours. The number of viable cells reduced over time for each strain; however Δizh2 and Δizh3 were significantly more resistant than the other strains after two and three hour’s incubation. The data in a-d are means and standard deviations of three replicate experiments: these were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2The effect of prolonged (24 h) exposure to amphotericin B (0.5 μg mlor 1.0 μg ml) on wild-type and selected deletion mutants of measured by the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within yeast cells. Data presented are ratios of the number of fluorescent cells compared to the total population; at least 200 cells from ten fields of view were used to analyse each treatment. Incubation with amphotericin B induced significantly greater production of ROS in treated wild type BY4742, Δaif1 and Δstm1. Amphotericin B had no significant effect on Δizh2 and Δizh3. The data shown are means and standard deviations from three replicate experiments and were analysed by the Manny-Whitney test to compare treated samples with the untreated control; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.