| Literature DB >> 24884574 |
Tarak K Chheda, Pratibha Shivakumar, Satish Kumar Sadasivan, Harish Chanderasekharan, Yogananda Moolemath, Anup M Oommen, Jagannath R Madanahalli, Venkataranganna V Marikunte1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as a spectrum of conditions ranging from hepatocellular steatosis to steatohepatitis and fibrosis, progressing to cirrhosis, which occur in the absence of excessive alcohol use. Several animal models capture aspects of NAFLD but are limited either in their representation of the disease stages or use for development of therapeutics due to the extended periods of time required to develop full histological features.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24884574 PMCID: PMC4036109 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-89
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Primers sequence for assessment of gene expression profiles
| TGFb1 | |
| COL1A1 | |
| TIMP1 | |
| Acta2 | |
| TNFa | |
| Osteopontin | |
| FABP4 | |
Effect on liver oxidative stress markers and liver triglyceride levels
| Liver TG (mg/g tissue) | 6.32 ± 0.79 | 8.73 ± 1.27 | 17.17 ± 0.96*** | 15.49 ± 1.51*** |
| Liver GSH (μg/mg protein) | 7.36 ± 0.62 | 6.81 ± 0.42 | 6.95 ± 0.45 | 2.58 ± 1.10** |
| Liver TBARS (μM/mg protein) | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.60 ± 0.064 | 3.73 ± 0.67*** | 2.10 ± 0.29** |
| Relative Liver weight (g) | 2.49 ± 0.04 | 2.86 ± 0.08 | 4.77 ± 0.15*** | 4.85 ± 0.16*** |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post test, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Serum biochemical profile
| AST (IU/L) | 118.0 ± 6.93 | 126.3 ± 2.85 | 138.4 ± 6.91* | 146.7 ± 6.91** |
| ALT (IU/L) | 54.92 ± 1.25 | 59.17 ± 0.95 | 62.73 ± 7.72 | 69.60 ± 4.15* |
| ALP (IU/L) | 87.67 ± 6.86 | 102.4 ± 7.44 | 228.8 ± 38.44*** | 227.8 ± 31.62*** |
| GGT (IUL) | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.30 ± 1.17*** |
| Procollagen type III (ng/ml) | 5.61 ± 0.61 | 5.65 ± 0.65 | 8.29 ± 0.58 | 14.96 ± 2.19*** |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 145.3 ± 14.28 | 96.72 ± 8.54* | 77.17 ± 7.90** | 75.43 ± 4.30** |
Effect on serum clinical chemistry markers; data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Gene expression profiles for Fibrosis, inflammation and fatty acid trafficking
| TGFβ1 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.22 ± 0.17 | 1.69 ± 0.14* |
| COL1A1 | 1.08 ± 0.17 | 1.56 ± 0.21 | 2.25 ± 0.32 | 13.05 ± 1.88*** |
| TIMP1 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 1.74 ± 0.15 | 2.41 ± 0.42** |
| ACTA2 | 1.08 ± 0.08 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 1.01 ± 0.12 | 0.87 ± 0.12 |
| TNFα | 1.05 ± 0.13 | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 3.59 ± 0.75** | 1.30 ± 0.23* |
| Osetopontin | 1.10 ± 0.34 | 0.86 ± 0.21 | 5.43 ± 1.14 | 9.79 ± 2.43** |
| FABP4 | 1.05 ± 0.15 | 1.59 ± 0.28 | 5.63 ± 0.57 | 45.46 ± 8.64*** |
Gene expression TGFB1, COlA1, TIMP1, Acta2, TNFa, FABP4 levels in liver; all data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The data measured by quantitative real-time RT-PCR was statistically analyzed for significant using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Scores of liver from chow diet, FFD and FFD-CCl
| Fibrosis | 00 ± 00 | 00 ± 00 | 0.92 ± 0.12*** | 2.30 ± 0.21*** |
| Steatosis – micro vesicular | 0.33 ± 0.14 | 0.75 ± 0.13 | 2.00 ± 0.21*** | 2.60 ± 0.16*** |
| Steatosis – macro vesicular | 00 ± 00 | 00 ± 00 | 1.92 ± 0.19*** | 2.50 ± 0.17*** |
| Hepatocellular ballooning | 00 ± 00 | 0.25 ± 0.13 | 1.00 ± 0.17*** | 1.50 ± 0.17*** |
| Inflammation | 0.75 ± 0.22 | 1.00 ± 0.25 | 1.75 ± 0.22** | 2.00 ± 0.26** |
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The data was statistically analyzed for significant using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison post test, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 1Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E, 1st and 2nd rows), Masson’s trichrome (3rd and 4th rows) and Sirius red (5th and 6th rows) – stained sections of liver tissues from chow diet, chow diet + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CClfast food diet (FFD), FFD + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CClfed animals on 8th week. There was no steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning or fibrosis in animals fed with chow diet. Mild micro-vesicular fatty changes and mild hepatocellular ballooning, without fibrosis observed in animals fed with chow diet + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CCl4. Fast food fed animals without CCl4 showing moderate micro-vesicular and macro-vesicular fatty changes, hepatocellular ballooning and minimal perisinusoidal fibrosis. FFD + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CCl4 fed animals showing severe micro-vesicular and macro-vesicular fatty changes with significant hepatocellular ballooning and prominent perisinusoidal, pericellular region with extensive distribution and bridging fibrosis. All liver sections were evaluated at X10 (low-magnification) and X40 (high-magnification).
Figure 2Row1: Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) stained sections of liver tissues from chow diet, chow diet + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CClfast food diet (FFD), FFD + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CClfed animals on 8th week. Liver section showing moderate infiltration of inflammatory cells (shown by black arrows) in fast food fed animals with and without CCl4 along with moderate micro-vesicular and macro-vesicular fatty changes and hepatocellular ballooning. Mild inflammation was observed in animals fed with chow diet + 0.5 ml/Kg B.wt CCl4. Row2: Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) stained sections of liver tissues. Liver sections showing increased hepatocellular ballooning in fast food fed animals with and without CCl4 along with moderate micro-vesicular and macro-vesicular fatty changes. All liver sections are represented at X40 (high-magnification).