| Literature DB >> 24883303 |
Georgia Levidou1, Sotirios Sachanas2, Gerassimos A Pangalis2, Christina Kalpadakis3, Xanthi Yiakoumis2, Maria Moschogiannis2, Athanasia Sepsa1, Eleftheria Lakiotaki1, Vassilis Milionis1, Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis4, Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos4, Pantelis Tsirkinidis2, Flora Kontopidou5, Styliani Kokoris6, Marina Siakantaris7, Maria Angelopoulou4, Helen Papadaki3, Nikolaos Kavantzas1, Panayiotis Panayiotidis4, Efstratios Patsouris1, Penelope Korkolopoulou1.
Abstract
A number of studies have looked into the pathophysiological role of angiogenesis in CLL, but the results have often been inconsistent. We aimed to gain direct insight into the angiogenic process in lymph nodes involved by CLL, focusing on proangiogenic cytokines and microvessel morphometry. The tissue levels of VEGF, Th-2 cytokines IL-6 and IL-8, IL-8 receptor CXCR2, and tyrosine p-STAT-3/SOCS-3 axis modulating cytokine expression were evaluated immunohistochemically in 62 CLL/SLL cases. Microvascular characteristics were evaluated by image analysis. Results were analyzed with regard to clinicopathological characteristics. Proliferation centers (PCs) were less well vascularised compared to non-PC areas. IL-8 and CXCR2 expression was distinctly uncommon as opposed to IL-6, VEGF and SOCS-3, which were detected in the vast majority of cases. The latter two molecule expressions were more pronounced in the PCs in ∼ 40% of the cases. p-STAT-3 immunoreactivity was recorded in 66.67% of the cases with a predilection for PCs. Microvessel morphometry was unrelated to proangiogenic cytokines, p-STAT-3, SOCS-3, or survival. Microvascular caliber and VEGF expression were higher in Binet stage A, whereas IL-6 expression was higher in stage C. VEGF and p-STAT-3 exerted a favorable effect on progression, which remained significant in multivariate analysis, thereby constituting potential outcome predictors in CLL patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24883303 PMCID: PMC4026921 DOI: 10.1155/2014/251479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Patients' characteristics at diagnosis.
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Age, median (range) | 58 (36–78) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Male | 40 (64.5) |
| Binet Stage | |
| A | 37 (59.7) |
| B | 17 (27.4) |
| C | 8 (12.9) |
| B-symptoms | 6 (11.10 |
| Bulky lymphadenopathy | 7 (13.2) |
| Splenomegaly | 17 (31.5) |
|
| 8 (14) |
| Platelet count (<100 × 109/L) | 3 (5) |
| Hyperglobulinemia | 4 (7.4) |
| Hypoglobulinemia | 12 (22.6 |
|
| 11 (73.3) |
| LDH > UNL* | 18 (32.7) |
| Absolute lymphocyte count (>10 × 109/L) | 29 (51) |
| CD38 (+) | 27 (55.1) |
| ZAP-70 (+) | 27 (51.9) |
| IGVH unmutated | 13 (81.3) |
|
| 1 (5.6) |
|
| 2 (9.1) |
*UNL: upper normal limit.
Characteristics of primary antibodies used in immunohistochemical analysis.
| Protein | Number of cases | Clone | Company | Catalog number | Raised in | Positive controls | Antigen retrieval method | Dilution and incubation time for immunohistochemistry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-8 | 51† | polyclonal | Invitrogen Corporation, Camarillo, CA | AHC 0881 | rabbit | Normal tonsillar tissue | pH 6 (low) | 1 : 50, 18 h 4°C |
|
| ||||||||
| IL-6 | 51† | polyclonal | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA | SC 1265 | goat | Normal tonsillar tissue | pH 6 (low) | 1 : 50, 18 h 4°C |
|
| ||||||||
| SOCS-3 | 35† | polyclonal | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA | SC 9023 | rabbit | Cholangiocarcinoma | pH 6 (low) | 1 : 100, 18 h 4°C |
|
| ||||||||
| CXCR2 | 51† | monoclonal | R and D Systems, Abingdon, England | MAB 331 | mouse | Normal tonsillar tissue | pH 9 (high) | 1 : 100, 18 h 4°C |
|
| ||||||||
| VEGF | 41* | monoclonal | Pharmingen BD Company, San Diego, CA | clone G153-694 | mouse | Glioblastoma | pH 6 (low) | 1 : 40, 18 h 4°C |
|
| ||||||||
| p-STAT3 | 51† | monoclonal | Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Boston, MA, USA | D3A7 XP | rabbit | Human breast cancer | pH 6 (low) | 1 : 100, 18 h 4°C |
|
| ||||||||
| CD34 | 54† | monoclonal | Dako, Carpinteria, CA | clone QBEnd/10 | mouse | Kaposi sarcoma | pH 9 (high) | 1 : 50, 30 min room temperature |
*21 cases were excluded due to loss of antigen preservation.
†In the remaining cases, staining information was not available due to exhaustion of the available tissue.
Microvascular characteristics.
| Within PCs | Outside PCs | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVD | 12 (3–45) | 25 (10–62) | 58 (15–247) |
| TVA ( | 341 (36–1913) | 768 (328–3646) | 1778 (494–11942) |
| Major axis length ( | 6.7 (3–15.2) | 9.1 (4.8–14.2) | 7.33 (4.92–13.76) |
| Minor axis length ( | 4.3 (2.1–12.4) | 6.02 (2.8–10.9) | 5.13 (2.99–10.88) |
| Perimeter ( | 13.6 (6.2–32.7) | 18.1 (9.5–3.6) | 15.28 (9.1–28.1) |
| Shape factor | 0.81 (0.78–0.88) | 0.8 (0.78–0.83) | 0.81 (0.74–0.87) |
| Compactness | 20.6 (19.2–25.2) | 21.1 (17.3–22.7) | 20.65 (17.6–29.1) |
| Feret diameter ( | 11.7 (9.5–14.5) | 11.8 (9.5–14.3) | 10.3 (8.17–21.52) |
| Area ( | 26.3 (12.02–63.1) | 35.5 (15.9–58.8) | 29.64 (16.07–55.61) |
Figure 1(a) Immunohistochemical staining of CD34 in a CLL case. (b) Same field as in (a). The outline of each vessel is traced; the red layer represents the section area of each vessel outside the PCs, whereas the yellow layer represents the section area of each vessel within the PCs. PCs display clearly higher MVD and TVA and rounder vessels when compared to non-PC areas. (PC: proliferation centers).
Figure 2Box plots illustrating the lower levels of MVD, major axis length, minor axis length, area, perimeter, and TVA and the higher levels of shape factor and VEGF H-score in the PCs when compared to the non-PC areas.
IL6, IL8, CXCR2. and VEGF immunostaining results.
| Immunohistochemical staining (H-score) | Percentage of positive cases | Median value in positive cases | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL6 | 96.08% | 10 | 0 | 180 |
| IL8 | 9.80% | 4.5 | 0 | 75 |
| CXCR2 | 13.21% | 30 | 0 | 60 |
| SOCS-3 | 97.1% | 67.5 | 0 | 175 |
| Tyrosine p-STAT-3 | 66.67% | 1 | 0 | 16 |
| VEGF | 100% | 70 | 0.75 | 212 |
Figure 3Immunohistochemical expression of IL-8 (a), CXCR2 (b), IL-6 (c), tyrosine p-STAT-3 (d, e), SOCS-3 (f), and VEGF (g, h) in lymph nodes from CLL patients. (a) A CLL case with very few scattered IL-8 positive lymphoid cells. The inset shows an IL-8 positive cell in a higher magnification. Note the positive endothelial cells. (b) CXCR2 expression in a CLL lymph node. (c) IL-6 expression homogeneously distributed throughout the lymphoid tissue. (d) Tyrosine p-STAT-3 in a case showing a more pronounced immunoreactivity in the PCs. Note that endothelial cells are strongly positive. (e) Scattered tyrosine p-STAT-3 positive lymphoid cells along with positive endothelial cells in a CLL case. (f) Higher SOCS-3 expression in the PC in a CLL case. (g) (h) Pronounced VEGF immunoexpression in the PCs compared with the area outside the PCs. Higher magnification (h) showing the cytoplasmic immunoreactivity of VEGF. (PC: proliferation centers; E: endothelial cells).
Figure 4Box plot illustrating the correlation between IL-6 H-score and Binet stage. IL-6 was higher in stage C, followed by stage A, whereas stage B cases displayed the lower levels of IL-6 H-score. Post hoc analysis indicated that the only significant difference was that between stages B and C (P = 0.0471, Tukey HSD method).
Figure 5(a, b) Kaplan Meier survival curves for OS according to tyrosine p-STAT-3 immunoreactivity (a) and VEGF H-score (b). (c) Kaplan Meier failure curves for TFT according to VEGF H-score. (d, e) Kaplan Meier failure curves for TTP according to tyrosine p-STAT-3 immunoreactivity (d) and VEGF H-score (e).
Multivariate Cox's proportional hazards estimations according to OS (model A), TFT (model B), and TTP (model C).
| Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
| 95% CI of HR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Binet stage (A versus B versus C) | 2.871 | 0.048 | 1.011 | 8.151 |
| B symptoms (absence versus presence) | 4.203 | 0.088 | 0.806 | 21.913 | |
|
| |||||
| B | Binet stage (A versus B versus C) | 2.199 | 0.001 | 1.369 | 3.534 |
|
| |||||
| C | Binet stage (A versus B versus C) | 4.271 | 0.003 | 1.651 | 11.049 |
| B symptoms (absence versus presence) | 4.188 | 0.061 | 0.935 | 18.764 | |
| Tyrosine p-STAT-3 expression (absence versus presence) | 0.202 | 0.024 | 0.050 | 0.813 | |
| VEGF H-score (<70 versus ≥70) | 0.375 | 0.078 | 0.117 | 1.198 | |