Pauline Favre1, Monica Baciu2, Cédric Pichat2, Thierry Bougerol3, Mircea Polosan3. 1. University Grenoble Alpes, LPNC, F-38000 Grenoble, France; CNRS, LPNC, F-38000 Grenoble, France. Electronic address: pauline.favre@upmf-grenoble.fr. 2. University Grenoble Alpes, LPNC, F-38000 Grenoble, France; CNRS, LPNC, F-38000 Grenoble, France. 3. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Pôle Psychiatrie et Neurologie, Centre Expert en Troubles Bipolaires, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France; University Grenoble Alpes, GIN, F-38000 Grenoble, France; INSERM, GIN, F-38000 Grenoble, France; CHU de Grenoble, GIN, F-38000 Grenoble, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neural substrates of bipolar disorder (BD) have frequently been characterized by dysregulation of fronto-limbic networks that may persist during euthymic periods. Only a few studies have investigated euthymic bipolar patients (BP) functional connectivity at rest. The current study aims to assess resting-state functional connectivity in euthymic BP in order to identify trait abnormalities responsible for enduring mood dysregulation in these patients. METHODS: Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) functional connectivity was investigated in 20 euthymic BP and 20 healthy subjects (HS). The functional connectivity maps were compared across groups using a between-group random effect analysis. Additional region of interest (ROI) analysis focused on mPFC-amygdala functional connectivity as well as correlations between the clinical features in euthymic BP was also conducted. RESULTS: A significant difference between euthymic BP and HS was observed in terms of connectivity between the mPFC and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). A significant negative correlation between the activity of these regions was found in HS but not in euthymic BP. In addition, euthymic BP showed greater connectivity between mPFC and right amygdala compared to HS, which was also correlated with the duration of the disease. LIMITATIONS: The BP group was heterogeneous with respect to the bipolarity subtype and the medication. The robustness of results could be improved with an increased sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to HS, the euthymic BP showed abnormal decoupling (decreased functional connectivity) activity between mPFC-dlPFC and hyperconnectivity (increased functional connectivity) and between mPFC and amygdala. These abnormalities could underlie the pathophysiology of BD, and may deteriorate further in accordance with disease duration.
BACKGROUND: Neural substrates of bipolar disorder (BD) have frequently been characterized by dysregulation of fronto-limbic networks that may persist during euthymic periods. Only a few studies have investigated euthymic bipolarpatients (BP) functional connectivity at rest. The current study aims to assess resting-state functional connectivity in euthymic BP in order to identify trait abnormalities responsible for enduring mood dysregulation in these patients. METHODS: Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) functional connectivity was investigated in 20 euthymic BP and 20 healthy subjects (HS). The functional connectivity maps were compared across groups using a between-group random effect analysis. Additional region of interest (ROI) analysis focused on mPFC-amygdala functional connectivity as well as correlations between the clinical features in euthymic BP was also conducted. RESULTS: A significant difference between euthymic BP and HS was observed in terms of connectivity between the mPFC and the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). A significant negative correlation between the activity of these regions was found in HS but not in euthymic BP. In addition, euthymic BP showed greater connectivity between mPFC and right amygdala compared to HS, which was also correlated with the duration of the disease. LIMITATIONS: The BP group was heterogeneous with respect to the bipolarity subtype and the medication. The robustness of results could be improved with an increased sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to HS, the euthymic BP showed abnormal decoupling (decreased functional connectivity) activity between mPFC-dlPFC and hyperconnectivity (increased functional connectivity) and between mPFC and amygdala. These abnormalities could underlie the pathophysiology of BD, and may deteriorate further in accordance with disease duration.
Authors: Tanya T Nguyen; Sanja Kovacevic; Sheena I Dev; Kun Lu; Thomas T Liu; Lisa T Eyler Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: J Stoddard; S J Gotts; M A Brotman; S Lever; D Hsu; C Zarate; M Ernst; D S Pine; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Adrienne A Taren; Peter J Gianaros; Carol M Greco; Emily K Lindsay; April Fairgrieve; Kirk Warren Brown; Rhonda K Rosen; Jennifer L Ferris; Erica Julson; Anna L Marsland; J David Creswell Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Kathryn E Lewandowski; Julie M McCarthy; Dost Öngür; Lesley A Norris; Geoffrey Z Liu; Richard J Juelich; Justin T Baker Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 4.939