Literature DB >> 24881820

Outcomes after intrauterine insemination are independent of provider type.

Randi H Goldman1, Maria Batsis2, Michele R Hacker3, Irene Souter4, John C Petrozza4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) varies based on the type of health care provider performing the procedure. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study set at an infertility clinic at an academic institution. The patients who comprised this study were 1575 women who underwent 3475 IUI cycles from late 2003 through early 2012. Cycles were stratified into 3 groups according to the type of provider who performed the procedure: attending physician, fellow physician, or registered nurse (RN). The primary outcome was live birth. Additional outcomes of interest included positive pregnancy test and clinical pregnancy. Repeated measures log binomial regression was used to estimate the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the outcomes and to evaluate the effect of potential confounders. All tests were 2-sided, and P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Of the 3475 IUI cycles, 2030 (58.4%) were gonadotropin stimulated, 929 (26.7%) were clomiphene citrate stimulated, and 516 (14.9%) were natural. The incidences of clinical pregnancy and live birth among all cycles were 11.8% and 8.8%, respectively. After adjusting for female age, male partner age, and cycle type, the incidence of live birth was similar for RNs compared with attending physicians (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.58-1.1) and fellow physicians compared with attending physicians (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.2). Similar results were seen for positive pregnancy test and clinical pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in live birth following IUI cycles in which the procedure was performed by a fellow physician or RN compared with an attending physician.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infertility; intrauterine insemination; pregnancy rate; provider type

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24881820      PMCID: PMC4457274          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  23 in total

1.  Does the experience of the provider affect pregnancy rates after embryo transfer?

Authors:  Anne Desparoir; Marianne Capelle; Julie Banet; Agnes Noizet; Marc Gamerre; Blandine Courbière
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network.

Authors:  D S Guzick; S A Carson; C Coutifaris; J W Overstreet; P Factor-Litvak; M P Steinkampf; J A Hill; L Mastroianni; J E Buster; S T Nakajima; D L Vogel; R E Canfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Seddigheh Esmailzadeh; Mahbobeh Faramarzi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men.

Authors:  B J Cohlen; P Vandekerckhove; E R te Velde; J D Habbema
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

5.  Women, weight, and fertility: the effect of body mass index on the outcome of superovulation/intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Irene Souter; Lina M Baltagi; Damien Kuleta; John D Meeker; John C Petrozza
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis.

Authors:  A Campana; D Sakkas; A Stalberg; P G Bianchi; I Comte; T Pache; D Walker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Marie Hélène Heraud; Nadège Grenier; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Pierre Sanguinet; Henri Copin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success.

Authors:  Hakan E Duran; Mahmood Morshedi; Thinus Kruger; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial.

Authors:  Richard H Reindollar; Meredith M Regan; Peter J Neumann; Bat-Sheva Levine; Kim L Thornton; Michael M Alper; Marlene B Goldman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Influences on endometrial development during intrauterine insemination: clinical experience of 2,929 patients with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Erin Foran Wolff; Nima Vahidi; Connie Alford; Kevin Richter; Eric Widra
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors affecting clinical pregnancy rates after IUI for the treatment of unexplained infertility and mild male subfertility.

Authors:  Melahat Atasever; Müberra Namlı Kalem; Şafak Hatırnaz; Ebru Hatırnaz; Ziya Kalem; Zeynep Kalaylıoğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-09-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.