Mako Hayase1, Mieko Shimada2, Hiroyuki Seki3. 1. Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. 2. Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. Electronic address: shimadam@sahs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp. 3. Saitama Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Center for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with complications including pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) often experience disrupted sleep patterns because of activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These pathologies are aggravated by sympathetic nervous system activation and may be related to stress. The present study aimed to clarify the characteristics of and changes in sleep quality and stress in pregnant women with PIH and GDM during the second and third trimesters. METHODS: We enrolled 56 women in their second or third trimesters who were diagnosed with PIH or GDM. Participants completed questionnaires, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Secretory immunoglobulin A (SlgA) concentrations were measured as a biological indicator of stress. RESULTS: PSS scores and subjective stress parameters were significantly higher than those reported from previous studies of healthy pregnant women (15.2 points and 15.1 points for the second and third trimesters, respectively). Mean one-day values for SIgA were 168.3 and 205.7 μg/mL for the second and third trimesters, respectively. During the second and third trimesters, SIgA scores were higher than those reported for healthy pregnant women in previous studies. The PSQI component scores sleep disturbance (C5) and sleep duration (C3) in follow up case were significantly higher in the third trimester than in the second trimester. DISCUSSION: This investigation suggests that pregnant women with PIH and GDM experience higher stress levels than do non-pregnant women and healthy pregnant women. Further, our results indicate that sleep quality worsens during the third trimester compared with the second trimester.
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with complications including pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) often experience disrupted sleep patterns because of activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These pathologies are aggravated by sympathetic nervous system activation and may be related to stress. The present study aimed to clarify the characteristics of and changes in sleep quality and stress in pregnant women with PIH and GDM during the second and third trimesters. METHODS: We enrolled 56 women in their second or third trimesters who were diagnosed with PIH or GDM. Participants completed questionnaires, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Secretory immunoglobulin A (SlgA) concentrations were measured as a biological indicator of stress. RESULTS: PSS scores and subjective stress parameters were significantly higher than those reported from previous studies of healthy pregnant women (15.2 points and 15.1 points for the second and third trimesters, respectively). Mean one-day values for SIgA were 168.3 and 205.7 μg/mL for the second and third trimesters, respectively. During the second and third trimesters, SIgA scores were higher than those reported for healthy pregnant women in previous studies. The PSQI component scores sleep disturbance (C5) and sleep duration (C3) in follow up case were significantly higher in the third trimester than in the second trimester. DISCUSSION: This investigation suggests that pregnant women with PIH and GDM experience higher stress levels than do non-pregnant women and healthy pregnant women. Further, our results indicate that sleep quality worsens during the third trimester compared with the second trimester.
Authors: Joan A Casey; Dana E Goin; Kara E Rudolph; Brian S Schwartz; Dione Mercer; Holly Elser; Ellen A Eisen; Rachel Morello-Frosch Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Dorota Wołyńczyk-Gmaj; Anna Różańska-Walędziak; Simon Ziemka; Marcin Ufnal; Aneta Brzezicka; Bartłomiej Gmaj; Piotr Januszko; Sylwia Fudalej; Krzysztof Czajkowski; Marcin Wojnar Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2017-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Ai Kubo; Assiamira Ferrara; Susan D Brown; Samantha F Ehrlich; Ai-Lin Tsai; Charles P Quesenberry; Yvonne Crites; Monique M Hedderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Virginia A Aparicio; Olga Ocón; Carmen Padilla-Vinuesa; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; Lidia Romero-Gallardo; Milkana Borges-Cósic; Irene Coll-Risco; Pilar Ruiz-Cabello; Pedro Acosta-Manzano; Fernando Estévez-López; Inmaculada C Álvarez-Gallardo; Manuel Delgado-Fernández; Jonatan R Ruiz; Mireille N Van Poppel; Julio J Ochoa-Herrera Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.007