Literature DB >> 24880849

Three-dimensional evaluation of the pharyngeal airway volumes in patients affected by unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Mevlut Celikoglu1, Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk2, Ahmet Ercan Sekerci3, Faruk Izzet Ucar4, Kenan Cantekin5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients affected by cleft lip and palate often have complaints of snoring and respiratory difficulties during sleep. The purposes of this study were to evaluate nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and total airway volumes of patients affected by unilateral cleft lip and palate and to compare them with a well-matched control group without unilateral cleft lip and palate using cone-beam computed tomography.
METHODS: The study sample consisted of 60 patients (26 girls, 34 boys) divided into 2 groups: unilateral cleft lip and palate (20 boys, 10 girls; 8 right sided, 22 left sided; mean age, 14.6 ± 3.2 years) and no cleft (control group; 14 boys, 16 girls; mean age, 14.8 ± 2.8 years). Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and total airway volumes of the subjects in both groups were calculated 3 dimensionally with cone-beam computed tomography. Group differences in relation to cleft side, sex, and cleft presence were statistically tested at P <0.05.
RESULTS: Patients affected by unilateral cleft lip and palate had similar airway volumes regardless of the side of the cleft. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found between the sexes in the 2 groups. Patients affected by unilateral cleft lip and palate had smaller nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and total airway volumes when compared with the control group. The difference for oropharyngeal airway volume (-4036.7 mm(3)) was statistically significant (P <0.05), whereas nasopharyngeal volume (-21.6 mm(3)) and total airway volume (-4057.3 mm(3)) differences were not significant (P >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients affected by unilateral cleft lip and palate had decreased volumes of oropharyngeal (P <0.05) and total (P >0.05) airways compared with the well-matched control group without unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880849     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Radiographic volume analysis as a novel tool to determine nasopalatine duct cyst dimensions and its association with presenting symptoms and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Valerie G A Suter; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Peter A Reichart; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Upper airway features of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients in different growth stages.

Authors:  Bengisu Akarsu-Guven; Jale Karakaya; Figen Ozgur; Muge Aksu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of upper airway structures in paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Romeo Patini; Mariantonietta Arrica; Enrico Di Stasio; Patrizia Gallenzi; Massimo Cordaro
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of the mandibular volume and correlating variables in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk; Salih Celik; Ahmet Ercan Sekerci; Mehmet Akin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of the Pharyngeal Airway Volume between Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Palate and Normal Individuals Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Shoaleh Shahidi; Shahla Momeni Danaie; Mahsa Omidi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-09

6.  Effects of the long-term use of maxillary protraction facemasks with skeletal anchorage on pharyngeal airway dimensions in growing patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Jung-Eun Kim; Sunjin Yim; Jin-Young Choi; Sukwha Kim; Su-Jung Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of the velopharyngeal region in patients with cleft palate and healthy individuals.

Authors:  Simone Miller; Michael-Tobias Neuhaus; Rüdiger Zimmerer; Frank Tavassol; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Martin Ptok; Michael Jungheim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Two-Dimensional Analysis of the Size of Nasopharynx and Adenoids in Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using Lateral Cephalograms.

Authors:  Sarvin Sarmadi; Javad Chalipa; Behrad Tanbakuchi; Maryam Javaheri Mahd; Maryam Nasiri; Mohammad Reza Mehtari
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-05

9.  Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares.

Authors:  Maycon Lázaro Pinheiro; Marília Yatabe; Marcos Ioshida; Luan Orlandi; Priscille de Dumast; Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.