Literature DB >> 24880832

Collaborative EDNAP exercise on the IrisPlex system for DNA-based prediction of human eye colour.

Lakshmi Chaitanya1, Susan Walsh1, Jeppe Dyrberg Andersen2, Ricky Ansell3, Kaye Ballantyne4, David Ballard5, Regine Banemann6, Christiane Maria Bauer7, Ana Margarida Bento8, Francesca Brisighelli9, Tomas Capal10, Lindy Clarisse11, Theresa E Gross12, Cordula Haas13, Per Hoff-Olsen14, Clémence Hollard15, Christine Keyser15, Kevin M Kiesler16, Priscila Kohler14, Tomasz Kupiec17, Adrian Linacre18, Anglika Minawi6, Niels Morling2, Helena Nilsson19, Lina Norén3, Renée Ottens18, Jukka U Palo20, Walther Parson7, Vincenzo L Pascali9, Chris Phillips21, Maria João Porto8, Antti Sajantila22, Peter M Schneider12, Titia Sijen11, Jens Söchtig21, Denise Syndercombe-Court5, Andreas Tillmar19, Martina Turanska23, Peter M Vallone16, Lívia Zatkalíková23, Anastassiya Zidkova24, Wojciech Branicki25, Manfred Kayser26.   

Abstract

The IrisPlex system is a DNA-based test system for the prediction of human eye colour from biological samples and consists of a single forensically validated multiplex genotyping assay together with a statistical prediction model that is based on genotypes and phenotypes from thousands of individuals. IrisPlex predicts blue and brown human eye colour with, on average, >94% precision accuracy using six of the currently most eye colour informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (HERC2 rs12913832, OCA2 rs1800407, SLC24A4 rs12896399, SLC45A2 (MATP) rs16891982, TYR rs1393350, and IRF4 rs12203592) according to a previous study, while the accuracy in predicting non-blue and non-brown eye colours is considerably lower. In an effort to vigorously assess the IrisPlex system at the international level, testing was performed by 21 laboratories in the context of a collaborative exercise divided into three tasks and organised by the European DNA Profiling (EDNAP) Group of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG). Task 1 involved the assessment of 10 blood and saliva samples provided on FTA cards by the organising laboratory together with eye colour phenotypes; 99.4% of the genotypes were correctly reported and 99% of the eye colour phenotypes were correctly predicted. Task 2 involved the assessment of 5 DNA samples extracted by the host laboratory from simulated casework samples, artificially degraded, and provided to the participants in varying DNA concentrations. For this task, 98.7% of the genotypes were correctly determined and 96.2% of eye colour phenotypes were correctly inferred. For Tasks 1 and 2 together, 99.2% (1875) of the 1890 genotypes were correctly generated and of the 15 (0.8%) incorrect genotype calls, only 2 (0.1%) resulted in incorrect eye colour phenotypes. The voluntary Task 3 involved participants choosing their own test subjects for IrisPlex genotyping and eye colour phenotype inference, while eye photographs were provided to the organising laboratory and judged; 96% of the eye colour phenotypes were inferred correctly across 100 samples and 19 laboratories. The high success rates in genotyping and eye colour phenotyping clearly demonstrate the reproducibility and the robustness of the IrisPlex assay as well as the accuracy of the IrisPlex model to predict blue and brown eye colour from DNA. Additionally, this study demonstrates the ease with which the IrisPlex system is implementable and applicable across forensic laboratories around the world with varying pre-existing experiences.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDNAP; Eye colour prediction; FDP; Forensic DNA phenotyping; ISFG; IrisPlex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880832     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

1.  A single nucleotide polymorphism panel for individual identification and ancestry assignment in Caucasians and four East and Southeast Asian populations using a machine learning classifier.

Authors:  Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Ming-Yih Wu; Chih-Peng Lin; Wei Hsin Hsieh; Hsiang-I Yin; Tsui-Ting Lee; James Chun-I Lee
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Genetic and environmental factors in conjunctival UV autofluorescence.

Authors:  Seyhan Yazar; Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Charlotte M McKnight; Piriya Quach-Thanissorn; Jenny A Mountain; Minas T Coroneo; Craig E Pennell; Alex W Hewitt; Stuart MacGregor; David A Mackey
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Global skin colour prediction from DNA.

Authors:  Susan Walsh; Lakshmi Chaitanya; Krystal Breslin; Charanya Muralidharan; Agnieszka Bronikowska; Ewelina Pospiech; Julia Koller; Leda Kovatsi; Andreas Wollstein; Wojciech Branicki; Fan Liu; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Importance of nonsynonymous OCA2 variants in human eye color prediction.

Authors:  Jeppe D Andersen; Carlotta Pietroni; Peter Johansen; Mikkel M Andersen; Vania Pereira; Claus Børsting; Niels Morling
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  Further evidence for population specific differences in the effect of DNA markers and gender on eye colour prediction in forensics.

Authors:  Ewelina Pośpiech; Joanna Karłowska-Pik; Bartosz Ziemkiewicz; Magdalena Kukla; Małgorzata Skowron; Anna Wojas-Pelc; Wojciech Branicki
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.