Literature DB >> 24880719

The new regulation to investigate potentially beneficial diagnostic and therapeutic methods in Germany: up to international standard?

Britta Olberg1, Matthias Perleth2, Reinhard Busse3.   

Abstract

Funding of diagnostic and therapeutic methods in Germany's statutory health insurance (SHI) follows a dichotomy: in outpatient care, only methods with proven benefit are reimbursed while in inpatient care, all methods may be provided unless they are excluded due to proven harm or lack of benefit. In January 2012, a new section 137e was added to the Social Code Book V (SGB V), allowing for the inclusion of innovative and potentially beneficial diagnostic or therapeutic methods in the SHI benefit basket, while additional evidence regarding their effectiveness and safety must be gathered. In 2013, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) has specified the details of this new approach, which can be considered a variety of "Coverage with Evidence Development" (CED). Our comparison with CED schemes in selected countries reveals a dependence of the CED implementation on the encompassing healthcare system. However, we identify a clear legislative foundation, a definitive decision-making body, the possibility to obtain public funding, and the preference for high quality study designs as constituting factors of an emerging international standard for CED. In addition, it is necessary to ensure the suitability of circumstances and technologies for the successful application of CED in a clear and transparent way.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coverage with evidence development; Decision-making; Diagnostic and therapeutic methods; German reform; Health policy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880719     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  3 in total

1.  Implementation of innovative medical technologies in German inpatient care: patterns of utilization and evidence development.

Authors:  Cornelia Henschke; Dimitra Panteli; Marie Dreger; Helene Eckhardt; Susanne Felgner; Hanna Ermann; Hendrikje Lantzsch; Tanja Rombey; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 2.  Risk-Adjusted Cancer Screening and Prevention (RiskAP): Complementing Screening for Early Disease Detection by a Learning Screening Based on Risk Factors.

Authors:  Rita K Schmutzler; Björn Schmitz-Luhn; Bettina Borisch; Peter Devilee; Diana Eccles; Per Hall; Judith Balmaña; Stefania Boccia; Peter Dabrock; Günter Emons; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Jacek Gronwald; Stefanie Houwaart; Stefan Huster; Karin Kast; Alexander Katalinic; Sabine C Linn; Sowmiya Moorthie; Paul Pharoah; Kerstin Rhiem; Tade Spranger; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Johannes Jozef Marten van Delden; Marc van den Bulcke; Christiane Woopen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.268

3.  Evidence-based decision-making for diagnostic and therapeutic methods: the changing landscape of assessment approaches in Germany.

Authors:  Britta Olberg; Sabine Fuchs; Katja Matthias; Alexandra Nolting; Matthias Perleth; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-10-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.