Literature DB >> 24880659

Codifying knowledge to improve patient safety: a qualitative study of practice-based interventions.

Simon Turner1, Juliet Higginson2, C Alice Oborne3, Rebecca E Thomas4, Angus I G Ramsay5, Naomi J Fulop5.   

Abstract

Although it is well established that health care professionals use tacit and codified knowledge to provide front-line care, less is known about how these two forms of knowledge can be combined to support improvement related to patient safety. Patient safety interventions involving the codification of knowledge were co-designed by university and hospital-based staff in two English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals to support the governance of medication safety and mortality and morbidity (M&M) meetings. At hospital A, a structured mortality review process was introduced into three clinical specialities from January to December 2010. A qualitative approach of observing M&M meetings (n = 30) and conducting interviews (n = 40) was used to examine the impact on meetings and on front-line clinicians and hospital managers. At hospital B, a medication safety 'scorecard' was administered on a general medicine and elderly care ward from September to November 2011. Weekly feedback meetings were observed (n = 18) and interviews with front-line staff conducted (n = 10) to examine how knowledge codification influenced behaviour. Codification was shown to support learning related to patient safety at the micro (front-line service) level by structuring the sharing of tacit knowledge, but the presence of professional and managerial boundaries at the organisational level affected the codification initiatives' implementation. The findings suggest that codifying knowledge to support improvement presents distinct challenges at the group and organisational level; translating knowledge across these levels is contingent on the presence of enabling organisational factors, including the alignment of learning from clinical practice with its governance.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Codification; Organisational learning; Patient safety; Quality improvement; Tacit knowledge; UK

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880659     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Are there patient-related factors that influence sickness certification in patients with severe subjective health complaints? A cross-sectional exploratory study from different European countries.

Authors:  Suzanne L Merkus; Rob Hoedeman; Silje Mæland; Kristel H N Weerdesteijn; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Maud Jourdain; Jean-Paul Canevet; Cédric Rat; Johannes R Anema; Erik L Werner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Benjamin Brown; Wouter T Gude; Thomas Blakeman; Sabine N van der Veer; Noah Ivers; Jill J Francis; Fabiana Lorencatto; Justin Presseau; Niels Peek; Gavin Daker-White
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Study protocol: DEcisions in health Care to Introduce or Diffuse innovations using Evidence (DECIDE).

Authors:  Simon Turner; Stephen Morris; Jessica Sheringham; Emma Hudson; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Translating academic research into guidance to support healthcare improvement: how should guidance development be reported?

Authors:  Simon Turner; Charlotte A Sharp; Jessica Sheringham; Shaun Leamon; Naomi J Fulop
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.