Literature DB >> 24880653

Lag time from ovulation trigger to oocyte aspiration and oocyte maturity in assisted reproductive technology cycles: a retrospective study.

Amir Weiss1, Rebecca Neril2, Joel Geslevich3, Michal Lavee4, Ronit Beck-Fruchter3, Joanne Golan3, Eliezer Shalev4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between the lag time from ovulation trigger to oocyte aspiration and the proportion of metaphase II (MII) mature oocytes aspirated.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Fertility and IVF center in an academic regional hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 511 women undergoing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection at our center, with at least one oocyte available for maturity determination. INTERVENTION(S): Data were retrieved from patient electronic databases and files. Demographic data, hormone treatments and ovarian response, and the time of ovulation trigger and oocyte aspiration were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the proportion of MII mature oocytes relative to the total number of oocytes aspirated and allocated to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcomes. RESULT(S): There were fewer MII mature oocytes when the lag time between oocyte trigger and aspiration was between 33.45 hours and 34.45 hours. The proportion of MII oocytes seems to increase up to a 35-hour lag time and then stabilizes up to 38 hours. Pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates did not differ among the different time groups studied. CONCLUSION(S): Oocyte aspiration should be scheduled at least 35 hours after ovulation trigger. Oocytes can be aspirated in a 3-hour window of time between 35 and 38 hours without compromising results. Further research should elucidate whether even longer lag times will improve the proportion of MII mature oocytes.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; ICSI; MII oocytes; hCG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880653     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  The ovulation trigger-OPU time interval of different ovarian protocols in ART: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xi Shen; Hui Long; Wenya Guo; Yating Xie; Hongyuan Gao; Jie Zhang; Yun Wang; Qifeng Lyu; Yanping Kuang; Li Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  A Higher Estradiol Rise After Dual Trigger in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Is Associated With a Lower Oocyte and Mature Oocyte Yield in Normal Responders.

Authors:  Jialyu Huang; Xuefeng Lu; Jiaying Lin; Ningling Wang; Qifeng Lyu; Hongyuan Gao; Renfei Cai; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Optimal Ovulation Trigger-Oocyte Pickup Interval in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Xi Shen; Hui Long; Wenya Guo; Hongyuan Gao; Renfei Cai; Wei Jin; Zhiguang Yan; Shaozhen Zhang; Yun Wang; Qifeng Lyu; Li Wang; Yanping Kuang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: oocyte pick up.

Authors:  Arianna D'Angelo; Costas Panayotidis; Nazar Amso; Roberto Marci; Roberto Matorras; Mircea Onofriescu; Ahmet Berkiz Turp; Frank Vandekerckhove; Zdravka Veleva; Nathalie Vermeulen; Veljko Vlaisavljevic
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2019-12-10

5.  Ectopic pregnancy risk factors for ART patients undergoing the GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective study.

Authors:  A Weiss; R Beck-Fruchter; J Golan; M Lavee; Y Geslevich; E Shalev
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.