Literature DB >> 24879651

The prevalence and psychological costs of household violence by family members against women with disabilities in Cambodia.

Jill Astbury1, Fareen Walji2.   

Abstract

Women with disabilities (WWDs) are at triple jeopardy due to the combined risks associated with gender, disability, and violence. Not only are WWDs marginalized socially but the violence against them in their own homes is largely neglected in domestic violence research. Evidence from developing countries is particularly sparse. A cross-sectional survey conducted in Cambodia found rates of violence by household members besides intimate partners were significantly higher among WWDs than non-disabled women. This violence engendered increased levels of psychological distress and higher rates of physical injury but low rates of disclosure to health workers and other formal sources of potential support. Community-based strategies are recommended to radically change social and cultural attitudes, beliefs, and responses to WWDs who are victims of household violence to reduce negative social reactions toward them and to make it safer for them to disclose and receive psychosocial, legal, and other necessary support for this underreported type of violence.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cultural contexts; domestic violence; predictors of household violence; vulnerability to abuse; women with disabilities

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24879651     DOI: 10.1177/0886260514534528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interpers Violence        ISSN: 0886-2605


  8 in total

1.  A scoping review of measurement of violence against women and disability.

Authors:  Sarah R Meyer; Heidi Stöckl; Cecilia Vorfeld; Kaloyan Kamenov; Claudia García-Moreno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sexual and reproductive health services for women with disability: a qualitative study with service providers in the Philippines.

Authors:  Kira Lee; Alexandra Devine; Ma Jesusa Marco; Jerome Zayas; Liz Gill-Atkinson; Cathy Vaughan
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Evaluating a multicomponent social behaviour change communication strategy to reduce intimate partner violence among married couples: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial in Nepal.

Authors:  Cari Jo Clark; Rachael A Spencer; Binita Shrestha; Gemma Ferguson; J Michael Oakes; Jhumka Gupta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Community stakeholders' perspectives on the role of occupational therapy in primary healthcare: Implications for practice.

Authors:  Deshini Naidoo; Jacqueline Van Wyk; Robin Joubert
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-02-28

5.  Clouding the Judgment of Domestic Violence Law: Victim Blaming by Institutional Stakeholders in Cambodia.

Authors:  Katherine Brickell
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2015-06-15

6.  Intimate Partner Violence among Women with Disabilities in Uganda.

Authors:  Anne Valentine; Ilhom Akobirshoev; Monika Mitra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  How do programmes to prevent intimate partner violence among the general population impact women with disabilities? Post-hoc analysis of three randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Kristin Dunkle; Andrew Gibbs; Esnat Chirwa; Erin Stern; Ingrid Van Der Heijden; Laura Washington
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-12

8.  Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes.

Authors:  Esnat Chirwa; Rachel Jewkes; Ingrid Van Der Heijden; Kristin Dunkle
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.