Literature DB >> 24879647

Compressed sensing for bioelectric signals: a review.

Darren Craven, Brian McGinley, Liam Kilmartin, Martin Glavin, Edward Jones.   

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of compressed sensing or compressive sampling (CS) in bioelectric signal compression applications. The aim is to provide a detailed analysis of the current trends in CS, focusing on the advantages and disadvantages in compressing different biosignals and its suitability for deployment in embedded hardware. Performance metrics such as percent root-mean-squared difference (PRD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and power consumption are used to objectively quantify the capabilities of CS. Furthermore, CS is compared to state-of-the-art compression algorithms in compressing electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalography (EEG) as examples of typical biosignals. The main technical challenges associated with CS are discussed along with the predicted future trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24879647     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2327194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  13 in total

1.  Simulation study on compressive laminar optical tomography for cardiac action potential propagation.

Authors:  Takumi Harada; Naoki Tomii; Shota Manago; Etsuko Kobayashi; Ichiro Sakuma
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Compressive sensing meets time-frequency: An overview of recent advances in time-frequency processing of sparse signals.

Authors:  Ervin Sejdić; Irena Orović; Srdjan Stanković
Journal:  Digit Signal Process       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.381

3.  Evaluation of liver tumor identification rate of volumetric-interpolated breath-hold images using the compressed sensing method and qualitative evaluation of tumor contrast effect via visual evaluation.

Authors:  Daisuke Yoshimaru; Yoich Araki; Chifumi Matsuda; Natsuhiko Shirota; Yu Tajima; Shuhei Shibukawa; Katsutoshi Murata; Dominik Nickel; Kazuhiro Saito
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

4.  Pruning-Based Sparse Recovery for Electrocardiogram Reconstruction from Compressed Measurements.

Authors:  Jaeseok Lee; Kyungsoo Kim; Ji-Woong Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Efficient ECG Compression and QRS Detection for E-Health Applications.

Authors:  Mohamed Elgendi; Amr Mohamed; Rabab Ward
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Design of an Adaptive Human-Machine System Based on Dynamical Pattern Recognition of Cognitive Task-Load.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhang; Zhong Yin; Rubin Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Trends in Compressive Sensing for EEG Signal Processing Applications.

Authors:  Dharmendra Gurve; Denis Delisle-Rodriguez; Teodiano Bastos-Filho; Sridhar Krishnan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A Comparative Study of Computational Methods for Compressed Sensing Reconstruction of EMG Signal.

Authors:  Lorenzo Manoni; Claudio Turchetti; Laura Falaschetti; Paolo Crippa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Accelerated sparsity based reconstruction of compressively sensed multichannel EEG signals.

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyib; Muhammad Amir; Umer Javed; M Waseem Akram; Mussyab Yousufi; Ijaz M Qureshi; Suheel Abdullah; Hayat Ullah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Fast and Robust Non-Sparse Signal Recovery Algorithm for Wearable ECG Telemonitoring Using ADMM-Based Block Sparse Bayesian Learning.

Authors:  Yunfei Cheng; Yalan Ye; Mengshu Hou; Wenwen He; Yunxia Li; Xuesong Deng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.