BACKGROUND: FDG PET/CT with myocardial perfusion imaging is a useful method for evaluating cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but interpretation is not standardized. We developed a method for quantification of cardiac FDG PET/CT and evaluated its relationship to conventional interpretation, perfusion defects, clinical events, and immunosuppressive treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: FDG PET/CT with MPI studies performed for CS (n = 38) were retrospectively compared to negative control studies acquired for oncologic indications (n = 10). Quantitative measures of FDG volume-intensity (Cardiac Metabolic Activity, CMA) was performed using standardized uptake values (SUVs). CMA (477.7 ± 909 vs 0.55 ± 2.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.3 g glucose, P = .02) was significantly greater in visually FDG-positive studies compared to visually negative and oncologic negative studies. Among patients with CS, CMA was greater in studies with an EF < 50% (760.3 ± 1,148 vs 87.4 ± 161 g glucose, P = .03) and preceding an adverse clinical event (1,095 ± 1,253 vs 73 ± 144 g glucose, P = .006). CMA was the only independent predictor of events by multivariate analysis. In patients with repeat examinations (n = 7), CMA decreased with prednisone treatment in 5 of 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of FDG uptake in CS correlates with lower EFs, clinical events, and immunosuppression treatment.
BACKGROUND: FDG PET/CT with myocardial perfusion imaging is a useful method for evaluating cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but interpretation is not standardized. We developed a method for quantification of cardiac FDG PET/CT and evaluated its relationship to conventional interpretation, perfusion defects, clinical events, and immunosuppressive treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: FDG PET/CT with MPI studies performed for CS (n = 38) were retrospectively compared to negative control studies acquired for oncologic indications (n = 10). Quantitative measures of FDG volume-intensity (Cardiac Metabolic Activity, CMA) was performed using standardized uptake values (SUVs). CMA (477.7 ± 909 vs 0.55 ± 2.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.3 g glucose, P = .02) was significantly greater in visually FDG-positive studies compared to visually negative and oncologic negative studies. Among patients with CS, CMA was greater in studies with an EF < 50% (760.3 ± 1,148 vs 87.4 ± 161 g glucose, P = .03) and preceding an adverse clinical event (1,095 ± 1,253 vs 73 ± 144 g glucose, P = .006). CMA was the only independent predictor of events by multivariate analysis. In patients with repeat examinations (n = 7), CMA decreased with prednisone treatment in 5 of 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of FDG uptake in CS correlates with lower EFs, clinical events, and immunosuppression treatment.
Authors: Brian A Mc Ardle; David H Birnie; Ran Klein; Rob A de Kemp; Eugene Leung; Jennifer Renaud; Jean DaSilva; George A Wells; Rob S Beanlands; Pablo B Nery Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Simon Greulich; Claudia Christina Deluigi; Steffen Gloekler; Andreas Wahl; Christine Zürn; Ulrich Kramer; Detlev Nothnagel; Helmut Bültel; Julia Schumm; Stefan Grün; Peter Ong; Anja Wagner; Steffen Schneider; Kai Nassenstein; Meinrad Gawaz; Udo Sechtem; Oliver Bruder; Heiko Mahrholdt Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-03-14
Authors: Brian P Betensky; Cory M Tschabrunn; Erica S Zado; Lee R Goldberg; Francis E Marchlinski; Fermin C Garcia; Joshua M Cooper Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Ron Blankstein; Michael Osborne; Masanao Naya; Alfonso Waller; Chun K Kim; Venkatesh L Murthy; Pedram Kazemian; Raymond Y Kwong; Michifumi Tokuda; Hicham Skali; Robert Padera; Jon Hainer; William G Stevenson; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael T Osborne; Edward A Hulten; Avinainder Singh; Alfonso H Waller; Marcio S Bittencourt; Garrick C Stewart; Jon Hainer; Venkatesh L Murthy; Hicham Skali; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Sanjay Divakaran; Avinainder Singh; Bradley Collins; Tomas Vita; Rodney H Falk; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-01
Authors: Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Rob S Beanlands; Wengen Chen; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; David H Birnie; Edward S Chen; Leslie T Cooper; Roderick H Tung; Eric S White; Salvador Borges-Neto; Marcelo F Di Carli; Robert J Gropler; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ron Blankstein Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: G Cameron Coleman; Peter W Shaw; Pelbreton C Balfour; Jorge A Gonzalez; Christopher M Kramer; Amit R Patel; Michael Salerno Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07-20