Literature DB >> 24878931

The prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kaiyu Sun1, Shuling Chen, Jianbo Xu, Guanghua Li, Yulong He.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple and effective parameter, initially created to evaluate preoperative nutritional conditions and surgical risk. It has been recently been found to be associated with short- and long-term outcomes of various malignancies. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive significance of PNI in cancer, as a mean to assist in determining the optimal surgery timing and in improving the survival of cancer patients.
METHODS: Data were retrieved from PubMed and ISI Web of Science to identify eligible studies. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were extracted and pooled to explore the relationships of PNI with patient survival and clinicopathological features.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies with a total of 3,414 participants met the inclusion criteria. Low PNI was associated with poor overall survival (pooled OR 1.80, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.59-2.04) and the presence of post-operative complications (pooled OR 2.45, 95 % CI 1.31-4.58) in cancer patients, but not with cancer-specific survival (CSS) (pooled HR 1.81, 95 % CI 0.94-3.49). PNI was also found to be associated with invasion depth (pooled OR 5.07, 95 % CI 2.34-10.96) and lymph node metastasis (pooled OR 3.70, 95 % CI 2.32-5.92) in gastric cancer, whereas TNM stage was the only clinicopathological feature associated with PNI in colorectal carcinoma (pooled OR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.24-2.64).
CONCLUSIONS: PNI might be an effective predictive indicator for the prognosis of cancer, especially digestive system carcinomas. Further studies are required to verify the significance of PNI in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24878931     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1714-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  28 in total

1.  Correlation of pre-operative nutritional condition with post-operative complications in surgical treatment for oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  T Nozoe; Y Kimura; M Ishida; H Saeki; D Korenaga; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Prognostic nutritional index predicts postoperative outcome in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Mohri; Yasuhiro Inoue; Koji Tanaka; Junichirou Hiro; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints.

Authors:  M K Parmar; V Torri; L Stewart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comparison of the prognostic values of various inflammation based factors in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  De-shen Wang; Hui-yan Luo; Miao-zhen Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  G P Buzby; J L Mullen; D C Matthews; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The prognostic nutritional index can be a prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tadahiro Nozoe; Mayuko Kohno; Tomohiro Iguchi; Emiko Mori; Takashi Maeda; Akito Matsukuma; Takahiro Ezaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Preoperative platelet lymphocyte ratio as an independent prognostic marker in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Viren Asher; Joanne Lee; Anni Innamaa; Anish Bali
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W Chua; K A Charles; V E Baracos; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jayne F Tierney; Lesley A Stewart; Davina Ghersi; Sarah Burdett; Matthew R Sydes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  101 in total

1.  Prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Vlatka Periša; Lada Zibar; Ana Knezović; Igor Periša; Jasminka Sinčić-Petričević; Igor Aurer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Novel immunological and nutritional-based prognostic index for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kai-Yu Sun; Jian-Bo Xu; Shu-Ling Chen; Yu-Jie Yuan; Hui Wu; Jian-Jun Peng; Chuang-Qi Chen; Pi Guo; Yuan-Tao Hao; Yu-Long He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Is the prognostic nutritional index a prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy?

Authors:  Yakup Bozkaya; Osman Köstek; Abdullah Sakin; Deniz Tataroğlu Özyükseler; Teoman Şakalar; İbrahim Çil
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Impact of the prognostic nutritional index on the recovery and long-term oncologic outcome of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyoung Tae Noh; Jeonghee Han; Min Soo Cho; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Preoperative change of modified Glasgow prognostic score after stenting predicts the long-term outcomes of obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Sato; Masaya Oikawa; Tetsuya Kakita; Takaho Okada; Tomoya Abe; Takashi Yazawa; Haruyuki Tsuchiya; Naoya Akazawa; Masaki Sato; Tetsuya Ohira; Yoshihiro Harada; Haruka Okano; Kei Ito; Noriaki Ohuchi; Takashi Tsuchiya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  The clinical significance of systemic inflammation score in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lihui Han; Qingxu Song; Yibin Jia; Xuan Chen; Cong Wang; Pengxiang Chen; Rui Min; Yufeng Cheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 7.  Gastric cancer and gene copy number variation: emerging cancer drivers for targeted therapy.

Authors:  L Liang; J-Y Fang; J Xu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Cem Mirili; Ali Yılmaz; Serkan Demirkan; Mehmet Bilici; Salim Basol Tekin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Prognostic value of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index in oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Takashi Nonaka; Makoto Hisanaga; Akiko Fukuda; Yukinori Tanoue; Takafumi Yoshimoto; Shigekazu Hidaka; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Assessing serum albumin concentration, lymphocyte count and prognostic nutritional index might improve prognostication in patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Marko Lucijanic; Ivo Veletic; Dario Rahelic; Vlatko Pejsa; David Cicic; Marko Skelin; Ana Livun; Katarina Marija Tupek; Tajana Stoos-Veic; Tomo Lucijanic; Ana Maglicic; Rajko Kusec
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.